Yes.
http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/legacy/assets/documents/global_warming/exxon_report.pdf
The funders of climate disinformation Campaign against Climate Change
ExxonMobil gave 1.5M to climate disinformation groups last year breaking its pledge to stop funding denial machine ThinkProgress
ExxonMobil - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Exxon Mobil - SourceWatch
Dark Money Funds Climate Change Denial Effort - Scientific American
Alfred Wegener Institute ExxonMobil s Disinformation Campaign
What You Should Know About Exxon Mobil 8217 s Latest Ad Campaign TIME.com
Unreliable Sources 2 How the Media Help the Kochs ExxonMobil Spread Climate Disinformation Elliott Negin
Unreliable Sources 3 How the Media Help the Kochs ExxonMobil Spread Climate Disinformation Elliott Negin
New Film Documents ExxonMobil Role in Climate Disinformation Campaign DeSmogBlog
Petition ExxonMobil Stop Funding the Disinformation Campaign Change.org
The first link, simply states that Exxon has funded the other side of the argument. I thought part of Science was asking questions among peers, sharing information, discussing things?
But that is not what the Global Warming nuts Who Blame CO2, do, your "scientists" exclude and attack, demean, all that find fault with your emails and lost data and failed computer models.
Climate scientists have been looking at all sides of this issue for decades. 97 out of every 100 of them have come to the conclusion that AGW is valid. There is no more debate over the broad outlines. What you are talking about is precisely the disinformation campaign that Exxon Mobil and other fossil fuel industry powers are waging - a technique they learned from the tobacco industry and proponents of intelligent design: take advantage of the lack of hard proof in the natural sciences and the public's poor grasp of science to convince the voters that these points are still controversial; that no consensus actually exists.
And there are twelve more links to examine showing ExxonMobil to be involved in a disinformation campaign.
Give us the name of the 97 for and 3 against.
You're not really that stupid, are you?
Solar and Wind consume more oil, Solar and Wind demand more oil
I guess you are precisely that stupid.
Exxon and all the other companies make money cause it takes a lot more Oil to build and manufacture Solar and Wind. Your ideas are so shallow, so narrow.
Your ideas are so ignorant; so unsupportably stupid.
Ignorance is the position of crick.
1) Let's see, solar and wind plants consume more hydrocarbons than do oil, gas and coal fired power plants
2) CO2 "wants" to be cool. It cools things. It is not physically capable of heating them.
3) CO2 is used in the production of bread. If we restrict CO2 emissions, humanity will starve.
So, you think I'm ignorant? Wow...