sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,633
- 280
So the cost of a new knee for grandpa isn't worth it? Instead grandpa gets a cane? So what happens when someone wants to spend money on a Acura, that's the same thing as a Honda, but has sleeker lines and costs a lot extra money. Yea I'm still thinking that the consumer is perfectly capable of determining what they spend their money on.By the government then? So a controlled utilitarianism is what you're looking for? People are too stupid to know what to spend their money on?
Don't assume things. It makes you look like an ass.
No, not by a government. Value should be calculated by the cost of resources and nessecary labor. Prices should be reflective as close to the cost of production and distribution as possible. Anything else is pure madness.
What you just described is companies catering to their bottom lines over the customer(which is not based in reality)...I'm guessing your upset that these too big to fail CEOs make a ton of money over some employees. And yes that is absolutely wrong, but guess what, too big to fail is a socialistic term. There is no such thing as too big to fail in capitalism. The big guys will fall when they make stupid business decisions, and that provides a path for the smaller business to move on up.