California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,058
- 0
- Banned
- #61
I'm sorry, but I'm still laughing at the thought that the booper is going to send this wailing gibberish article from Hufferpost to the Obama..
Me too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm sorry, but I'm still laughing at the thought that the booper is going to send this wailing gibberish article from Hufferpost to the Obama..
Quote where I said America is lazy or stupid. I dare you. Don't post again until you have MY NAME and LAZY or STUPID in the same post about AMERICA.
You can't, fucktard. So go sit the fuck down on a rusty nail.
The last cop out of the terminally stupid. I showed you where you wrote that, fucktard. Can you not read? Do you not understand what you yourself write?
Quote where I said America is lazy or stupid. I dare you. Don't post again until you have MY NAME and LAZY or STUPID in the same post about AMERICA.
You can't, fucktard. So go sit the fuck down on a rusty nail.
The last cop out of the terminally stupid. I showed you where you wrote that, fucktard. Can you not read? Do you not understand what you yourself write?
Fucking retard.
You didn't show shit. You interpreted my words. I never wrote that.
Thanks for proving once again WHY I usually don't respond to your brand of fucking-insane bat-shit fuckedupness. I don't know why I did. Nobody listens to you.
You can't find me saying that so what do you do? You INTERPRET what I say like a fucking dumbass.
Clinton even said it on Morning Joe today...American efficiency has stayed the same for 20 years!!!
You're pathetic. When you can't get someone to say what you want...you just make shit up. That makes all your posts even more worthless than they already were. You can't be trusted to see facts in front of your face...and when you comment on something, it's full of lies and bullshit. Nasty, wet, farty, drippy cow feces that has no bearing on the topic...just your biased spin that has zero value in a real discussion.
Continue to make shit up when you've lost. It makes you look even worse.
Thanks for posting a chart that proved Clinton right. Let me interpret your own chart for you, since you seem to need it.
Clinton said "20 years"...that means we start with the PURPLE bar. Please tell me you're not color blind and can distinguish PURPLE. (I can't assume any basic skills at this point)
Moving towards today (moving towards the RIGHT on the chart) we have 3 numbers:
2.1, 2.5, and 2.4. PERCENT.
Are they exactly the same number? No.
Do they have to be exactly the same number for Clinton's comment to be correct? No.
The change is so miniscule as to mean nothing. At most .004 change and at least .001 change - GETTING WORSE TOWARDS THE PRESENT!
You're a dumbfuck of the highest order. So rabid and so partisan that no one would ever take anything you say as valid for any reason. I hope you enjoy that. You must be able to survive on convincing yourself that you win these pointless forum points - because I doubt you get any validation from outside sources.
Cliff's Notes: You lie, making your posts worthless.
That's your response?
BAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
You can't even argue about my interpretation of the chart! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
What a fucking pathetic loser. Hell, at least CaliGirl or RetArmy would go back to the chart and try to dispute me. You couldnt even do THAT!!
Wow. You really rushed to prove my point!
That's all this stupid twit is capable of.
She has to be spoonfed her opinions mixed with baby food.
Anyone who attacks the position of another with nothing more than random insults is clearly doing so because they themselves are incapable of making a rational argument that disproves the position they wish to oppose. Insulting someone is nothing more than a means to control the conversation by diverting from the fact that you have no rational argument to make.
See how I did that? I didnt just call you a halfwit, I made a rational statement to support my position, and then I flatly stated that youre a moron.
That's your response?
BAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
You can't even argue about my interpretation of the chart! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
What a fucking pathetic loser. Hell, at least CaliGirl or RetArmy would go back to the chart and try to dispute me. You couldnt even do THAT!!
You are simply embarrassing yourself. You clearly do not understand what the chart says or how to read it. It is obvious, painfully obvious. I would just shut up and go on to another thread if I were you.
Geezus, what a clown. On the off chance you might understand this here goes:But yet you can't point out any of what you claim.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA
Specifics, tardo. Don't fool yourself, I don't think you'll actually come up with a real response. But see, the way people who actually discuss real issues would expect that from you next.
Me - addressed the chart directly
You - couldn't address an envelope
BAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Geezus, what a clown. On the off chance you might understand this here goes:But yet you can't point out any of what you claim.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA
Specifics, tardo. Don't fool yourself, I don't think you'll actually come up with a real response. But see, the way people who actually discuss real issues would expect that from you next.
Me - addressed the chart directly
You - couldn't address an envelope
BAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
The chart is labeled "Prductivity Change in the Non-Farm sector." Note it does not mean total productivity, only the rate of change. Note that in every period the rate of change is positive, meaning that productivity grew in EVERY period. This is cumulative. There was no regression in productivity.
So obviously American productivity has not stayed the same over 20 years. It has grown over 7% in the last 20 years. You get this number by taking a base of 100, adding the productivity for the first period, then add the productivity for the second period on top of the increased base from the first, and then the same with the third. You will come up with 7.16% total increase.
But I'll bet even having explained to you the chart is not TOTAL productivity but only CHANGE in productivity and every period is positive you still will insist somehow you are right.
Capital stock is the total inflation adjusted value of all business equipment in the US. Thats machines, robots, vehicles, tools, software, computers, pencils, paper...the whole shebang. For the first time since World War II, US capital stock is contracting. Meaning, employers are not reinvesting in their equipment. More machines are left broken or outdated than are being replaced or upgraded.
Employers likely underinvested in capital stock during the darkest days of the credit crisis. But why arent they catching up now? Perhaps worker productivity is down along with capital stock because theres simply not enough business to warrant investment...either in people or equipment.
I'm doing nothing of the sort.
Though if I were, I'd simply be doing EXACTLY what you do - claiming I've said something I clearly didn't say. You lie about what I say and claim it as Bible fact.
Shame you had to revert away from the actual topic again. Predicatable, expected, obvious.
I'm doing nothing of the sort.
Though if I were, I'd simply be doing EXACTLY what you do - claiming I've said something I clearly didn't say. You lie about what I say and claim it as Bible fact.
Shame you had to revert away from the actual topic again. Predicatable, expected, obvious.
You quoted Bill Clinton as saying something about productivity and I showed it wasn't true. IN the course of that you showed you cannot read and interpret a bar graph correctly. To cover it up you throw a bunch of BS around to obfuscate.
Pitiful, "counselor" <snort>
I'm doing nothing of the sort.
Though if I were, I'd simply be doing EXACTLY what you do - claiming I've said something I clearly didn't say. You lie about what I say and claim it as Bible fact.
Shame you had to revert away from the actual topic again. Predicatable, expected, obvious.
You quoted Bill Clinton as saying something about productivity and I showed it wasn't true. IN the course of that you showed you cannot read and interpret a bar graph correctly. To cover it up you throw a bunch of BS around to obfuscate.
Pitiful, "counselor" <snort>