The Pedophilia accusations rule?

Status
Not open for further replies.
To get a faster answer...

And because the usual suspects just turn it into another filthy name calling, insult fest. They don't have the courage to come right out and say it though.

They lied about three people today and got away with it.
 
I know of what Mani is referring to...and it is a good question. One I wondered about myself.
 
No Accusations of other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia.

The previous seems fairly concise.

However, posts such as this are prevalent on this forum with obviously direct reference to paedophiliac activity when taken in context:

I don't think he/she was talking just about watching

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-about-sex-ed-for-9-to-11-year-old-girls.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-phil-robertson-a-paedophile.html#post9518816

The trend was noticed here...

What's creepy are the posters who insist on drawing incorrect conclusions even though they have nothing to support their opinions.

You say you "guess" but what you're really saying is that you have decided that the real reason Delta posted about FACTS is that "he gets a perverted sexual gratification out of it".

Two of our resident fake christians pulled the same shit on me and there's now a new thread in the Flame Zone where several are doing it to Howey.

The real creeps are people like you and them who lie about other posters and are so lacking in basic human decency that you think there's nothing wrong in accusing other posters of being child predators.

There have been, by my estimation, five to six posts today reported by myself and others regarding these soooooooooooooooooooooclose accusations of paedophilia, it is my opinion that a change to the Forum Rules is necessary.

No Accusation or inference to other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia is strictly prohibited and will result in a ban.

Much like the "family" rule....one that's so broadly applied it's ridiculous.

Another suggestion is to make obvious flaming and/or taunting posts outside of the Flame Zone punishable. There are two or three members of this forum who contribute nothing, absolutely nothing to the forum, but taunting.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

It's been said that there's a thin line between Genius and insanity , It's been proven that there's a thin line between Homoseuality and the other sexual perversions you listed - to name names of people believed to be engaged in this sort of of dementia is a violation to debate the topic in generalities is not .
 
Someone BRAGS about being a pedophile or about abusing children?

As crazy as the posters are in the threads I get involved with, I must be staying in the relatively sane parts of USMB.
 
The only truly sane places in USMB are The Coffee Shop and The Quilting Thread.
 
Someone BRAGS about being a pedophile or about abusing children?

As crazy as the posters are in the threads I get involved with, I must be staying in the relatively sane parts of USMB.

No one did anything of the kind but three people were accused of .................

The threads are still there -

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...es-pornography-harm-children-who-view-it.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/368930-hey-howey-care-to-clarify-this-post.html
 
Moderation Message:

Hope you don't mind that I merged the Pro/Con threads
on this discussion.. :D If we're gonna do this -- Let's keep it
civil and in accordance with the rules of this forum.

FlaCalTenn
 
Here's a short "opinion"..
The thread that this started in was about exposing children to pornography, NOT about sexual
aggression towards children. Incidental or accidental exposure of children to pornography MIGHT BE
Child Abuse --- but NOT pedophilia.

Some people and Some posts jumped that fence and went STRAIGHT to pedo references and
folks were warned and posts deleted. But just discussing Child Abuse is NOT the same as Child Predation. Take a minute and a deep breath and see if your "outrages" are modified by this explanation.

If your goal was to MAKE a thread about pornography exposure EQUIVALENT to pedophilia -- you need to chose a better weapon before some threads get closed...
 
Last edited:
I understand why it's against the rules to accuse other posters of supporting and/or engaging in pedophilia, but is it really fair to enforce that rule when the poster in question openly flaunts their predilection, more or less daring anyone and everyone to call them on it, thereby earning themselves a ban?

:dunno:


Report said person to the mods.
 
To get a faster answer...
And because the usual suspects just turn it into another filthy name calling, insult fest. They don't have the courage to come right out and say it though.

They lied about three people today and got away with it.
That's how I see the vast majority of YOUR posts Luddy.

Not all, just the vast majority.
 
I understand why it's against the rules to accuse other posters of supporting and/or engaging in pedophilia, but is it really fair to enforce that rule when the poster in question openly flaunts their predilection, more or less daring anyone and everyone to call them on it, thereby earning themselves a ban?

:dunno:


Report said person to the mods.

So you think it's fair then.

Duly noted. :thup:
 
No Accusation or inference to other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia is strictly prohibited and will result in a ban.

(snip)

Thank you for your consideration of this request.


So, let me get this straight. You want to ban anyone who reads another person's post and infers from said post that it is a reference to bestiality or pedophilia?

That's Rather Harsh....Just sayin'.

No what they want is the Freedom to accuse anybody who opposes them, of being closeted fags, homophobes, latent homosexuals etc... without any repercussions . But anybody who points out flaws in their arguments or insults them to be banned. They wish to stifle free speech as much as possible as they have dome elsewhere.

Earlier today I had a pervert - Billy P -making comments about butt-fucking my wife - that seems to be perfectly okay with these degenerates - but heaven forbid you should insult them . SERIOUSLY ?!
 
(snip)

Thank you for your consideration of this request.


So, let me get this straight. You want to ban anyone who reads another person's post and infers from said post that it is a reference to bestiality or pedophilia?

That's Rather Harsh....Just sayin'.

No what they want is the Freedom to accuse anybody who opposes them, of being closeted fags, homophobes, latent homosexuals etc... without any repercussions . But anybody who points out flaws in their arguments or insults them to be banned. They wish to stifle free speech as much as possible as they have dome elsewhere.

Earlier today I had a pervert - Billy P -making comments about butt-fucking my wife - that seems to be perfectly okay with these degenerates - but heaven forbid you should insult them . SERIOUSLY ?!

Well does she have a nice butt? Can't blame a guy for yearning for a nice butt :dunno:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top