The Ocoee Massacre

Wallace got a lot of black votes.


Even the NAACP endorsed him in the 1950's. His welfare and education reforms as Governor favored black people more than any previous Governor did, despite his segregationist views, views which were necessary to gt elected in Alabama, whether one supported them personally or not.

In 1958, George Wallace ran against John Patterson in his first gubernatorial race. In that Alabama election, Wallace refused to make race an issue, and he declined the endorsement of the Ku Klux Klan. This move won Wallace the support of the NAACP. Patterson, on the other hand, embraced Klan support, and he trounced Wallace in the election. In 1962 Wallace, having realized the power of race as a political tool, ran for governor again—this time as a proponent of segregation. He won by a landslide.
 
Wallace won 46 electoral votes and nearly the entire South as the racist candidate in 1968.

And that is what is known as a "lie".

The "South" is made up of 16 states, and they are Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.

And in 1968 with the American Independent Party, George Wallace won five of them. And they are Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana,

He did not win "nearly the entire South". He did not even win "a majority" or even "half". He won exactly five states out of 16, or less than 1/3 of the states.

election-Results-Candidate-American-Political-Party-Votes-1968.jpg


YOu see, that is what happens when you simply try to make things up and claim things that are not true. Others come along and prove that you are wrong.

And yes, he won 46 electors out of 538. 270 of which were needed to be elected. He came nowhere even close, he had less than 1/5 of those needed to get elected.

have a nice day.
 
Name them.
Sigh...

1960–1969[edit]​

1970–1979[edit]​

1980–1989[edit]​

1990–1999[edit]​

2000–2009[edit]​

 
And that is what is known as a "lie".

The "South" is made up of 16 states, and they are Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.

And in 1968 with the American Independent Party, George Wallace won five of them. And they are Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana,

He did not win "nearly the entire South". He did not even win "a majority" or even "half". He won exactly five states out of 16, or less than 1/3 of the states.

election-Results-Candidate-American-Political-Party-Votes-1968.jpg


YOu see, that is what happens when you simply try to make things up and claim things that are not true. Others come along and prove that you are wrong.

And yes, he won 46 electors out of 538. 270 of which were needed to be elected. He came nowhere even close, he had less than 1/5 of those needed to get elected.

have a nice day.
Then I guess you lied first.

"He ran under the AIP once, and when he won no states he returned to the Democrats for his final two runs. Then he did at least win several states".

We'll have to disagree on what constituted "the South" in 1968 but it did not include Maryland, West virginia, Delaware or Kentucky.

But

If you care to look at the popular vote by state Wallace came reasonably close in Florida, North carolina, TN, and VA.
 
Wallace won 46 electoral votes and nearly the entire South as the racist candidate in 1968.
Thus informing the GOP decision to pursue the Southern strategy.

Wallace was a democrat who was gaining in the polls. Is it possible that the CIA recruited George Bremer to assassinate him?
 
Wallace was a democrat who was gaining in the polls. Is it possible that the CIA recruited George Bremer to assassinate him?
Golly.
Maybe Nixon ordered him hit so he wouldn't run third party again and steal the newly acquired Southern Strategy vote
or
Maybe McGovern
or...

Maybe he was a loon like many we have on this board?
 

So your response is everybody who ever changed parties? That is nothing like what you tried to claim.

And holy hell, you literally listed everybody who changed parties. Even the Latino kid who was born in California in the 1980s is now a "Southern Racist". Holy hell, even the guy from Puerto Rico who served as a representative from New York is a "Southern Racist".

That is not verifying what you said, it is not even close. Nice fail though, nice fail.

You see, that is the problem when you simply post something you claim is true. Some of us will actually look through that TLDR and pick some out at random to check. And I checked about 10 of them and not a single one was what you claimed it was. You just stole from somewhere a list of anybody that changed parties. California, New York, does n9ot matter, if they changed you are now blasting them automatically as a "Southern Racist".
 
Last edited:
We'll have to disagree on what constituted "the South" in 1968 but it did not include Maryland, West virginia, Delaware or Kentucky.

No matter how you count it, he did not win all of the south, or even half of the south.

Oh, and West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and Kentucky are unquestionable "Southern States". Hell, they were even all slave states at the start of the Civil War.

You were aware that there actually were slave states that fought for the Union, right?
 
"He ran under the AIP once, and when he won no states he returned to the Democrats for his final two runs. Then he did at least win several states".

No, I was correct. He actually won under many parties in 1968, but the main one is the AIP. He was listed in some of the primaries as a nominee for the Democratic Party, but in the Democratic Primaries only won 0.5% of the vote. To give an idea, Bear Bryant got more votes than that at 1,5%.

The AIP was a party created for George Wallace, and he was the only person to run under it. But he still was listed in the primaries of many states for the Democratic Party. And even in the election itself some states listed the AIP as the "George Wallace Party".

The next year the party dissolved and became the American Party.
 
Wallace was a democrat who was gaining in the polls. Is it possible that the CIA recruited George Bremer to assassinate him?

In 1972? When the election was one of the largest landslides in US history?

election-Results-Candidate-American-Political-Party-Votes-1972.jpg


That would be like trying to claim that the CIA planned to will Walter Mondale in 1984.
 
For you to fight for reparations from YOUR government. We kicked your sorry asses to the curb for a reason.

You reinforce just how great that was everytime you pollute this message board.
It wasnt great for the folk in Ocoee who were massacred before you stole their land.
 
the 1972 Democratic primary votes note George Wallace's vote count and states won. Wallaces stes won are in green.



350px-United_States_Democratic_presidential_primaries%2C_1972_by_state.svg.png


3,014 delegates to the 1972 Democratic National Convention
1,509 delegate votes needed to win
1968January 24 to June 20, 19721976
George McGovern (D-SD) (3x4-1).jpgHubert Humphrey 1968 DNC.jpgGeorge Wallace (D-AL) (3x4).jpg
CandidateGeorge McGovernHubert HumphreyGeorge Wallace
Home stateSouth DakotaMinnesotaAlabama
Delegate count1,378.9386.3377
Contests won1466
Popular vote4,053,4514,121,3723,755,424
Percentage25.3%25.8%23.5%

Edmund Muskie (D-ME) (croppedmore).jpgScoop Jackson (D-WA)-cropped.jpgShirley Chisholm-cropped.jpg
CandidateEdmund MuskieHenry M. JacksonShirley Chisholm
Home stateMaineWashingtonNew York
Delegate count209.153.7528.65
Contests won562
Popular vote1,840,217505,198430,703
Percentage11.5%3.2%2.69
 

Forum List

Back
Top