The New Political Definition of Healthcare

[PoliticalChic]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?


2. Well....it seems that that depends on who is in charge. If a Progressive, Liberal, secularist....then that role is ....muted......altered.

Here is one glaring example. The Obama regime wants doctors to base the care they give their patient on what the Bolsheviks of the Soviet Union called 'medical totalitarianism.' Rather than 'waste' time, care, medicine on you, the patient.....consider the collective, i.e., consider 'social justice.'

"True change, writes Dr. Emanuel [Obama's apparatchik in ObamaCare], must include reassessing the promise doctors make when they enter the profession, the Hippocratic Oath. Amazingly, Dr. Emanuel criticizes the Hippocratic Oath as partly to blame for the "overuse" of medical care: "Medical school education and post graduate education emphasize thoroughness," he wrote. Physicians take the "Hippocratic Oath's admonition to 'use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment' as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others." (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008.)

Of course that is what patients hope their doctors will do. But Dr. Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider social justice. They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere. Many doctors are horrified at this notion, and will tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time. "
Defend Your Health - For a Fit Body and Mind

Downgrading American Medical Care




3. If you have any doubt as to what 'social justice' means, look at the atrocities of the Soviet system in the last century. The slaughter of millions was met with a shrug, and chalked up to "you have to break some eggs if you want to make an omelette."



In other words, your life means nothing if one endorses the collective, big government.

Welcome to the 'brave new world.'

 

[jknowgood]

We can thank Obama and his supporters.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?


2. Well....it seems that that depends on who is in charge. If a Progressive, Liberal, secularist....then that role is ....muted......altered.

Here is one glaring example. The Obama regime wants doctors to base the care they give their patient on what the Bolsheviks of the Soviet Union called 'medical totalitarianism.' Rather than 'waste' time, care, medicine on you, the patient.....consider the collective, i.e., consider 'social justice.'

"True change, writes Dr. Emanuel [Obama's apparatchik in ObamaCare], must include reassessing the promise doctors make when they enter the profession, the Hippocratic Oath. Amazingly, Dr. Emanuel criticizes the Hippocratic Oath as partly to blame for the "overuse" of medical care: "Medical school education and post graduate education emphasize thoroughness," he wrote. Physicians take the "Hippocratic Oath's admonition to 'use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment' as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others." (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008.)

Of course that is what patients hope their doctors will do. But Dr. Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider social justice. They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere. Many doctors are horrified at this notion, and will tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time. "
Defend Your Health - For a Fit Body and Mind

Downgrading American Medical Care




3. If you have any doubt as to what 'social justice' means, look at the atrocities of the Soviet system in the last century. The slaughter of millions was met with a shrug, and chalked up to "you have to break some eggs if you want to make an omelette."



In other words, your life means nothing if one endorses the collective, big government.

Welcome to the 'brave new world.'

You are the equivalent of a paint store with only a single color paint and a single wide brush for sale.

This is another failed TROLL thread!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?


2. Well....it seems that that depends on who is in charge. If a Progressive, Liberal, secularist....then that role is ....muted......altered.

Here is one glaring example. The Obama regime wants doctors to base the care they give their patient on what the Bolsheviks of the Soviet Union called 'medical totalitarianism.' Rather than 'waste' time, care, medicine on you, the patient.....consider the collective, i.e., consider 'social justice.'

"True change, writes Dr. Emanuel [Obama's apparatchik in ObamaCare], must include reassessing the promise doctors make when they enter the profession, the Hippocratic Oath. Amazingly, Dr. Emanuel criticizes the Hippocratic Oath as partly to blame for the "overuse" of medical care: "Medical school education and post graduate education emphasize thoroughness," he wrote. Physicians take the "Hippocratic Oath's admonition to 'use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment' as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others." (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008.)

Of course that is what patients hope their doctors will do. But Dr. Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider social justice. They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere. Many doctors are horrified at this notion, and will tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time. "
Defend Your Health - For a Fit Body and Mind

Downgrading American Medical Care




3. If you have any doubt as to what 'social justice' means, look at the atrocities of the Soviet system in the last century. The slaughter of millions was met with a shrug, and chalked up to "you have to break some eggs if you want to make an omelette."



In other words, your life means nothing if one endorses the collective, big government.

Welcome to the 'brave new world.'

You are the equivalent of a paint store with only a single color paint and a single wide brush for sale.

This is another failed TROLL thread!

Once again your ignorance is on display.....

I note that you have been unable to give a single example of anything.....anything....in the OP that is not accurate, correct, and undeniable.

Let's remind all: the view of Obama, Emanuel, Progressives,et al is that government is in charge of whatever medical care citizens get......deserve.....



And the care is based not on efficacy and saving lives, but on costs, as they so determine.


Any student of history....and I realize that you and scholarship have yet to be acquainted....
....notes the similarity in outlook of today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats, with their earlier iteration.....
communists, Nazis, and fascists.


I have the sense that you see the similarity, too...and it embarrasses you.
Excellent.

 

[Moonglow]

Healthcare also involves mental evaluation also.....Guns are a leading cause of,,,,suicide...

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. Of course, you may actually believe that your life is your own, and expect doctors to, consistent with your wishes, help preserve and extend it.


Under a Progressive/Liberal regime, you'd be out of luck....and out of time.


“Another key [Obama] administration figure… is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy advisor in the Office of Management and Budget and brother of Rahm Emanuel, the president's chief of staff…

.....”is one of those responsible for inserting into the [ObamaCare] “healthcare bill” the ideas that we no longer should have rights, such as determining what care we can buy, or how long we should live, and doctors should no longer look to the Hippocratic Oath, and the particular patient, but neglect the patient in the interests of ‘social justice,’ and the society as a whole."
Hughesnet Satellite Internet | Satellite Internet | CPN

Get that?
"....we no longer should have rights,...."




That's what ObamaCare means: rationing and restricting healthcare. That is less important than American citizens understanding what your life means to the elites: nothing. A cypher. One more bean to count.



Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'



And it is based on this axiom:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

 

[Moonglow]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

 

[xotoxi]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?

Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?

Are you concerned that doctors are somehow MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW to ask such questions?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

 

[Moonglow]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?

Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?

Are you concerned that doctors are somehow MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW to ask such questions?

1. "Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?"

Are you sober???

That's exactly what the OP suggests:

"Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?"


2. The import of this thread is, and will prove, that Progressive governance removes the ability of physicians to make healthcare determinations.


Stay tuned.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

"You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?"

1. Who is "us"? You have a tapeworm?

2. Hard to imagine that you are so dumb you don't realize you are admitting to abject stupidity.

 

[Moonglow]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

"You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?"

1. Who is "us"? You have a tapeworm?

2. Hard to imagine that you are so dumb you don't realize you are admitting to abject stupidity.

Hardly so, when us includes the whole site..and your helter skelter form of bashing that's entertaining to fellow miscreants is irritating to anyone with any intelligence...Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

"You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?"

1. Who is "us"? You have a tapeworm?

2. Hard to imagine that you are so dumb you don't realize you are admitting to abject stupidity.

Hardly so, when us includes the whole site..and your helter skelter form of bashing that's entertaining to fellow miscreants is irritating to anyone with any intelligence...Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film...

1. "...your helter skelter form of bashing..."
It's clearly focused bashing, you dunce.....focused on you.



2. "Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film..."
Poor grammar makes me (sic).

"You're like a teenager blah blah blah...."

BTW...now you're inadvertently admitted that the thread has a point. Gotcha.



3. So....when are you gonna post something in this thread that has to do with the thread....either pro or con???????
When, already??????

 

[Moonglow]

Healthcare is no longer an aspect of medical science under Progressives and Liberals...it is 'legislative care,' it is 'medical totalitariansim,' ....it is 'social justice.'

Prognostication is the best any doctor can do, the ability to make one well when stricken with a disease includes good mental health....And you can go to any doctor you want, if you have the stash of cash.....

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

"You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?"

1. Who is "us"? You have a tapeworm?

2. Hard to imagine that you are so dumb you don't realize you are admitting to abject stupidity.

Hardly so, when us includes the whole site..and your helter skelter form of bashing that's entertaining to fellow miscreants is irritating to anyone with any intelligence...Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film...

1. "...your helter skelter form of bashing..."
It's clearly focused bashing, you dunce.....focused on your.



2. "Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film..."
Poor grammar makes me (sic).

"You're like a teenager blah blah blah...."

BTW...now you're inadvertently admitted that the thread has a point. Gotcha.



3. So....when are you gonna post something in this thread that has to do with the thread....either pro or con???????
When, already??????

I already did, yet you have no interest in any honest debate...

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Either you are clueless as to the meaning of 'prognostication,' or you meant to see your local gypsy instead of the doctor.

a. 'Prognosis' what you had in mind (and I use the term 'mind' loosely)?

Better look up 'diagnosis,' too.

'
2. What does cash have to do with it? Every person in the nation....citizen or otherwise....had healthcare since 1986, thanks to the finest President of the last hundred years.


3. The import of the thread is that the take-over of 'healthcare' by Progressives/Liberals/Democrats, has moved it from care for the ill, to one more inept bureaucracy.
And a fiscally failed one at that: "I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year."
"Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016."
socialHeadline



4. Now, I hate to mention it....but your A.D.D. is showing...

Neither of your posts has anything to do with the thread.

Are you sure you meant to post to this thread??????

You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?

"You mean to try to tell us you have a subject matter in this thread?"

1. Who is "us"? You have a tapeworm?

2. Hard to imagine that you are so dumb you don't realize you are admitting to abject stupidity.

Hardly so, when us includes the whole site..and your helter skelter form of bashing that's entertaining to fellow miscreants is irritating to anyone with any intelligence...Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film...

1. "...your helter skelter form of bashing..."
It's clearly focused bashing, you dunce.....focused on your.



2. "Your like a teenager on drugs trying to sell their point for a grand finale of a film..."
Poor grammar makes me (sic).

"You're like a teenager blah blah blah...."

BTW...now you're inadvertently admitted that the thread has a point. Gotcha.



3. So....when are you gonna post something in this thread that has to do with the thread....either pro or con???????
When, already??????

I already did, yet you have no interest in any honest debate...

1. No you haven't.

2. I never debate....I simply explain why I'm right.
But...you know that.



You're gonna love the next chapter......

 

[xotoxi]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?

Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?

Are you concerned that doctors are somehow MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW to ask such questions?

1. "Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?"

Are you sober???

That's exactly what the OP suggests:

"Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?"


2. The import of this thread is, and will prove, that Progressive governance removes the ability of physicians to make healthcare determinations.


Stay tuned.

1. You never express your OWN opinion, do you.

2. Apparently time does not make shit any less shitty.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yup..... in Politics, and not in 'Healthcare.' The reason will become clear.


1. Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?

Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?

Are you concerned that doctors are somehow MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW to ask such questions?

1. "Are you of the opinion that smoking and use of alcohol are not health concerns?"

Are you sober???

That's exactly what the OP suggests:

"Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun ownership in my home.

Is this a problem?

Is the doctor being inquisitive, or is he/she performing the very function that we, as patients, and he, as guided by the Hippocratic Oath, is required to?"


2. The import of this thread is, and will prove, that Progressive governance removes the ability of physicians to make healthcare determinations.


Stay tuned.

1. You never express your OWN opinion, do you.

2. Apparently time does not make shit any less shitty.

I always express my own opinion.

And I construct an unassailable thread to support it.

As is this one


You vulgarity hasn't changed, huh?
It appears when you get slapped down.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A question pertinent to your vote on election day:
Should medical doctrine be based on science, or on political correctness?


From the OP: "Doctors regularly discuss situations in the lives of their patients that might be less than healthy....such as smoking, or the use of alcohol....and I've even fielded questions about gun owner ship in my home."


How about a current and specific example of what happens when Progressives/Liberals are in charge of healthcare: doctors aren't.


5. "BOSTON, June 25, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- A well-loved and respected doctor with a background in sexual-risk behaviors has been expelled from one of the United States’ most prestigious and top-ranked medical centers after he raised evidence-based health risk concerns over the center’s decision to endorse and celebrate the homosexual lifestyle.

Dr. Church called the medical center “so indoctrinated with a worldview” supportive of the LGBTQ agenda that it sees this movement as “beyond reproach,” even to the extent of viewing someone as a bigot and culpable of misconduct charges for raising legitimate criticism about the center’s promotion of this movement and its activities.

.... Church and other like-minded colleagues repeatedly raised concern with officials over the center’s decision to not only endorse the homosexual lifestyle by hosting an annual “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Achievement Award ceremony,” but to involve staff in LGBTQ events including participation in Boston’s annual “Gay Pride Week.”
Leading U.S. hospital fires doctor for raising concerns about health risks of gay sex




Don't try to hide behind 'this is a private business'.....this is a medical facility, held to higher imperatives.....life and death.

Would it be acceptable if a hospital advocated smoking, or playing 'Russian Roulette'?

Or, maybe, had a dispensing machine of those airline mini liquor and alcohol nips bottle in the emergency room lobby?

Why not?

 

[Rustic]

Healthcare also involves mental evaluation also.....Guns are a leading cause of,,,,suicide...

Weak people are the leading cause of suicide. Dumbass