The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[bripat9643]

The private owners did not control industry in Nazi Germany. The government did.

Nazis did allow for private ownership, and private profits... Just with mild micro-management for National Interest.

The allowed the "owners" to have a worthless scrap of paper. Meanwhile the government made all the important decisions for the enterprise. The so-called "owners" were reduced to little more than factory managers.

The term "mild micro management" is an oxymoron.

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal. Slave elabor was used to build damns, mine for gold, cut wood, and manufacter numerous items. Opressive governments are all on the left. All you're doing is applying different labels to the exact same behavior.

The compensation Mercedes recieved is not properly described as a profit, according to the economic definition of the term. A profit is a surplus produced by the difference in price of the company's inputs compared to the proceeds from the sale of its products on the market. When government controls the price of the inputs, the price of the product and the quanitity produced and "sold," any excess is purely a decision made by government bureacrats, not the market. There is no market under fascism.

 

[bripat9643]

Exactly! That’s what I’ve beem saying all along and what you’ve been arguing against.

Sorry, I'm not for some oligarchy system where corporations work hand in hand with the government to remove the rights of citizens and workers for the betterment of a divisive ideology. That's called fascism, not socialism.

So, give it a break, fascists are firmly planted on the right side of the political spectrum.

Fascists are anti-Oligarchy.

The U.S.A is an Oligarchy.

Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

Nazis micro-managed Corporate clout, while also propping them up.

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

I consider Russia to be a right leaning state. You have a central leader, Putin who has put into place a small group of people to control the country's industries. With fewer people controlling the levers of power than the U.S. and it's citizens with fewer civil liberties than the United States I would say that Russia is more of an oligarchy than the United States and more fascist as there isn't much of a difference between the two.

I don't like the trend the United States is taking however this country and other western democracies are miles away from authoritarian governments be they oligarchies, fascist or communist, not that the latter really exists today outside of a couple banana republics.

This has been explained to you 1000 times already, douchebag. The private owners did not control industry in Nazi Germany. The government did. Slave labor isn't a feature of capitalism. It's a feature of socialism.

The government sold off it's industry to the private sector and those industries worked with the government to control it's citizens, reduce civil liberties and workers rights. Let's not forget that fascist countries tend to have a strong central leader/personality and a heavy dose of right wing nationalism. Unlike communism there is a class system where the haves control the have nots.

You have no conception of how fascism works. You're spouting leftwing propaganda, not economics.

This is the basic premise of a fascist economy:

Union between businesses and the State, with the state telling the business what to do, with nominally private ownership. Corporatism in Italy, National Socialism in Germany. Central planning of National economy. Redistribution of wealth (Nazi).

And Communist (because that's all you want to do is call Hitler a leftist):

All people are the same and therefore classes make no sense. The government should own all means of production and land and also everything else. People should work for the government and the collective output should be redistributed equally.

Yes, they both share some element of wealth redistribution however for very different purposes. In a fascist government the wealth stays at the top in a Communist government (though it never really works out that way) money is moved around to eliminate a class system. Both are severely flawed in there own unique way.

Communism vs Fascism - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

In both cases the government makes all the decisions for the enterprise. Fascism applies a pastiche of private ownership with a title that confers no rights of any kind. That's the only difference. Functionally, they are identical.

The purposes of the people running these system is irrelevant. Politicians lie about their purposes all the time. From an economic standpoint, it doesn't matter what they say or what they call things. It only matters what they do.

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

You certainly haven't demonstrated any such thing. In operation, they are indistinguishable.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Nazis did allow for private ownership, and private profits... Just with mild micro-management for National Interest.

The allowed the "owners" to have a worthless scrap of paper. Meanwhile the government made all the important decisions for the enterprise. The so-called "owners" were reduced to little more than factory managers.

The term "mild micro management" is an oxymoron.

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal.

The Soviets were pro-Atheist, and the Nazis were anti-Atheist.

As if there's no wealthy people in the U.S.A?

 

[P@triot]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

You’re an uneducated, uninformed, moron. Period.

Fascism is totalitarianism. That is the polar opposite of conservatism and as such, completely incompatible with the right-wing ideology.

I can’t imagine how often your left-wing masters laugh hysterically at how easy it is to dupe all of you left-wing minions.

 

[P@triot]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

 

[HappyJoy]

Nazis did allow for private ownership, and private profits... Just with mild micro-management for National Interest.

The allowed the "owners" to have a worthless scrap of paper. Meanwhile the government made all the important decisions for the enterprise. The so-called "owners" were reduced to little more than factory managers.

The term "mild micro management" is an oxymoron.

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal. Slave elabor was used to build damns, mine for gold, cut wood, and manufacter numerous items. Opressive governments are all on the left. All you're doing is applying different labels to the exact same behavior.

The compensation Mercedes recieved is not properly described as a profit, according to the economic definition of the term. A profit is a surplus produced by the difference in price of the company's inputs compared to the proceeds from the sale of its products on the market. When government controls the price of the inputs, the price of the product and the quanitity produced and "sold," any excess is purely a decision made by government bureacrats, not the market. There is no market under fascism.

Where is the Mercedes of the Soviet Union? Private enterprise was rewarded by fascism, not Communism.

 

[HappyJoy]

Sorry, I'm not for some oligarchy system where corporations work hand in hand with the government to remove the rights of citizens and workers for the betterment of a divisive ideology. That's called fascism, not socialism.

So, give it a break, fascists are firmly planted on the right side of the political spectrum.

Fascists are anti-Oligarchy.

The U.S.A is an Oligarchy.

Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

Nazis micro-managed Corporate clout, while also propping them up.

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

I consider Russia to be a right leaning state. You have a central leader, Putin who has put into place a small group of people to control the country's industries. With fewer people controlling the levers of power than the U.S. and it's citizens with fewer civil liberties than the United States I would say that Russia is more of an oligarchy than the United States and more fascist as there isn't much of a difference between the two.

I don't like the trend the United States is taking however this country and other western democracies are miles away from authoritarian governments be they oligarchies, fascist or communist, not that the latter really exists today outside of a couple banana republics.

The government sold off it's industry to the private sector and those industries worked with the government to control it's citizens, reduce civil liberties and workers rights. Let's not forget that fascist countries tend to have a strong central leader/personality and a heavy dose of right wing nationalism. Unlike communism there is a class system where the haves control the have nots.

You have no conception of how fascism works. You're spouting leftwing propaganda, not economics.

This is the basic premise of a fascist economy:

Union between businesses and the State, with the state telling the business what to do, with nominally private ownership. Corporatism in Italy, National Socialism in Germany. Central planning of National economy. Redistribution of wealth (Nazi).

And Communist (because that's all you want to do is call Hitler a leftist):

All people are the same and therefore classes make no sense. The government should own all means of production and land and also everything else. People should work for the government and the collective output should be redistributed equally.

Yes, they both share some element of wealth redistribution however for very different purposes. In a fascist government the wealth stays at the top in a Communist government (though it never really works out that way) money is moved around to eliminate a class system. Both are severely flawed in there own unique way.

Communism vs Fascism - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

In both cases the government makes all the decisions for the enterprise. Fascism applies a pastiche of private ownership with a title that confers no rights of any kind. That's the only difference. Functionally, they are identical.

The purposes of the people running these system is irrelevant. Politicians lie about their purposes all the time. From an economic standpoint, it doesn't matter what they say or what they call things. It only matters what they do.

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

You certainly haven't demonstrated any such thing. In operation, they are indistinguishable.

They aren't indistinguishable.

Here are the definitions:

Communism:
International theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, with actual ownership ascribed to the community or state. Rejection of free markets and extreme distrust of Capitalism in any form.

Fascism:
An extremely nationalistic, authoritarian state usually led by one person at the head of one party. No democratic election of representatives. No free market. No individualism or individual glory. The State controls of the press and all other media.

Those are the definitions. Now if you want to quibble that the USSR and other regimes took on some aspects of authoritarianism, that's fine I'd agree, but the definition of each is distinguishable.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

View attachment 168929

LMFAO, you're proving Americans, like yourself are dumb.

Liberalism - Wikipedia

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Right-wing politics - Wikipedia

Right-wing politics hold that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics or tradition.[4]. 693, 721[5][6][7][8][9][page needed] Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences[10][11]or the competition in market economies.[12][13] The term right-wing can generally refer to "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system".[14]

 

[P@triot]

Does anyone else see the humor in people like HappyJoy losing their shit on this forum over how conservatives keep voting for smaller government and more individual freedom and then turn around and claim that the right creates the unlimited totalitarian governments of fascism?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

You’re an uneducated, uninformed, moron. Period.

Fascism is totalitarianism. That is the polar opposite of conservatism and as such, completely incompatible with the right-wing ideology.

I can’t imagine how often your left-wing masters laugh hysterically at how easy it is to dupe all of you left-wing minions.

Conservatism is a political and social philosophy promoting traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization. The central tenets of conservatism include tradition, human imperfection, organic society, hierarchy and authority and property rights.

Conservatism - Wikipedia

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Does anyone else see the humor in people like HappyJoy losing their shit on this forum over how conservatives keep voting for smaller government and then turn around and claim that the right creates the unlimited totalitarian governments of fascism?

You're assuming everyone's American, and stupid like you.

These terms come from Europe, and don't fit there like you're saying.

You're proving that a lot more Americans don't understand politics than Europeans.

Because you are by definition a Liberal.

Liberalism - Wikipedia

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Sorry, I'm not for some oligarchy system where corporations work hand in hand with the government to remove the rights of citizens and workers for the betterment of a divisive ideology. That's called fascism, not socialism.

So, give it a break, fascists are firmly planted on the right side of the political spectrum.

Fascists are anti-Oligarchy.

The U.S.A is an Oligarchy.

Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

Nazis micro-managed Corporate clout, while also propping them up.

Council of Trust - Wikipedia

German Labour Front - Wikipedia

I consider Russia to be a right leaning state. You have a central leader, Putin who has put into place a small group of people to control the country's industries. With fewer people controlling the levers of power than the U.S. and it's citizens with fewer civil liberties than the United States I would say that Russia is more of an oligarchy than the United States and more fascist as there isn't much of a difference between the two.

I don't like the trend the United States is taking however this country and other western democracies are miles away from authoritarian governments be they oligarchies, fascist or communist, not that the latter really exists today outside of a couple banana republics.

The government sold off it's industry to the private sector and those industries worked with the government to control it's citizens, reduce civil liberties and workers rights. Let's not forget that fascist countries tend to have a strong central leader/personality and a heavy dose of right wing nationalism. Unlike communism there is a class system where the haves control the have nots.

You have no conception of how fascism works. You're spouting leftwing propaganda, not economics.

This is the basic premise of a fascist economy:

Union between businesses and the State, with the state telling the business what to do, with nominally private ownership. Corporatism in Italy, National Socialism in Germany. Central planning of National economy. Redistribution of wealth (Nazi).

And Communist (because that's all you want to do is call Hitler a leftist):

All people are the same and therefore classes make no sense. The government should own all means of production and land and also everything else. People should work for the government and the collective output should be redistributed equally.

Yes, they both share some element of wealth redistribution however for very different purposes. In a fascist government the wealth stays at the top in a Communist government (though it never really works out that way) money is moved around to eliminate a class system. Both are severely flawed in there own unique way.

Communism vs Fascism - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

In both cases the government makes all the decisions for the enterprise. Fascism applies a pastiche of private ownership with a title that confers no rights of any kind. That's the only difference. Functionally, they are identical.

The purposes of the people running these system is irrelevant. Politicians lie about their purposes all the time. From an economic standpoint, it doesn't matter what they say or what they call things. It only matters what they do.

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

You certainly haven't demonstrated any such thing. In operation, they are indistinguishable.

How come Fascist Nazis, and Fascist Italy did better than all 4 Capitalist countries being UK, USA, Canada, and France listed here in economic growth during the Great Depression?

 

[bripat9643]

The allowed the "owners" to have a worthless scrap of paper. Meanwhile the government made all the important decisions for the enterprise. The so-called "owners" were reduced to little more than factory managers.

The term "mild micro management" is an oxymoron.

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal. Slave elabor was used to build damns, mine for gold, cut wood, and manufacter numerous items. Opressive governments are all on the left. All you're doing is applying different labels to the exact same behavior.

The compensation Mercedes recieved is not properly described as a profit, according to the economic definition of the term. A profit is a surplus produced by the difference in price of the company's inputs compared to the proceeds from the sale of its products on the market. When government controls the price of the inputs, the price of the product and the quanitity produced and "sold," any excess is purely a decision made by government bureacrats, not the market. There is no market under fascism.

Where is the Mercedes of the Soviet Union? Private enterprise was rewarded by fascism, not Communism.

The Soviet equivalent was called AvtoVaz. There is no true private enterprise under fascism. It's totally government controlled. Private enterprise requires private control.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal. Slave elabor was used to build damns, mine for gold, cut wood, and manufacter numerous items. Opressive governments are all on the left. All you're doing is applying different labels to the exact same behavior.

The compensation Mercedes recieved is not properly described as a profit, according to the economic definition of the term. A profit is a surplus produced by the difference in price of the company's inputs compared to the proceeds from the sale of its products on the market. When government controls the price of the inputs, the price of the product and the quanitity produced and "sold," any excess is purely a decision made by government bureacrats, not the market. There is no market under fascism.

Where is the Mercedes of the Soviet Union? Private enterprise was rewarded by fascism, not Communism.

The Soviet equivalent was called AvtoVaz. There is no true private enterprise under fascism. It's totally government controlled. Private enterprise requires private control.

There's a difference of Communists seizing a business to replace it, as opposed to Fascists checking over your shoulder as a private profit business owner to make sure your business benefits National Interest.

It's not the same.

 

[HappyJoy]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

View attachment 168929

That chart is made up. As right and left are not specifically defined by levels of authoritarianism.

 

[P@triot]

Does anyone else see the humor in people like HappyJoy losing their shit on this forum over how conservatives keep voting for smaller government and then turn around and claim that the right creates the unlimited totalitarian governments of fascism?

You're assuming everyone's American, and stupid like you.

These terms come from Europe, and don't fit there like you're saying.

So your position is that the right and left in Europe is different? That would mean something if we were in Europe, stupid. But we’re not. We’re in the U.S. Which means we operate by U.S. measurements, U.S. definitions, and U.S. political terms.

 

[P@triot]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

View attachment 168929

That chart is made up. As right and left are not specifically defined by levels of authoritarianism.

There is nothing made up about the chart. It’s indisputable. The further right you go - government gets smaller and less powerful until it ceases to exist at all (or anarchy). The further left you go - government gets larger and more powerful until it has unlimited power and total control (or totalitarianism - such as fascism, communism, etc.).

This is basic stuff here. Only and idiot or a liar would get it wrong.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Actually the factory owners were enriched fheavily and the workers were often times slave laborers.

How do you know if they were "enriched?" What they recieved isn't propaerly labeled a "profit" in the economic sense of the term. It was simply a payment from the government. A profit is the result of trading your goods in the market. Factory "owners" didn't trade anything. Their prices were determined by the government. So where their customers and their suppliers.

Companies such as Mercedes made a lot of money due to the use of slave labor provided by the government and then of course that same government provided these companies with a lot of business. Deutsche Bank made out like bandits seizing Jewish assets. When you have a government that reduces it's citizens rights such as religious freedoms, democratic institutions such as the right to vote and banning trade unions while supplying the rich with free labor you're called a right wing fascist government.

The Soviet Union also reduced the right of citizens to vote, banned trade unions and curtailed religious freedom, and it had a class of wealthy party apparatchiks who had an endless supply of labor at their disposal. Slave elabor was used to build damns, mine for gold, cut wood, and manufacter numerous items. Opressive governments are all on the left. All you're doing is applying different labels to the exact same behavior.

The compensation Mercedes recieved is not properly described as a profit, according to the economic definition of the term. A profit is a surplus produced by the difference in price of the company's inputs compared to the proceeds from the sale of its products on the market. When government controls the price of the inputs, the price of the product and the quanitity produced and "sold," any excess is purely a decision made by government bureacrats, not the market. There is no market under fascism.

Where is the Mercedes of the Soviet Union? Private enterprise was rewarded by fascism, not Communism.

The Soviet equivalent was called AvtoVaz. There is no true private enterprise under fascism. It's totally government controlled. Private enterprise requires private control.

This is not Capitalism, it's not Communism either.

It's Fascism.

Women and families in Nazi Germany and The Nazi Rule Flashcards | Quizlet

How did Small businesses benefit from the Nazi rule? And what were the disadvantages?
Some businesses doubled and engineers did well making munitions.

Jewish shop owners had their shops closed down even if they sold the same stock.
How did Big businesses benefit from the Nazi rule? And what were the disadvantages?
Managers average salary raised by 70%. Huge profits from reinforcement, no fear of strikes (destroyed trade unions)

Nazis controlled prices, wage levels and profits and what the industry produced.
How did Farmers benefit from the Nazi rule? And what were the disadvantages?
Nazis made a Reich Entailed Farm Laws banning banks from seizing their land if they got into debt. The reich Food Estate sold their produce and guaranteed money.

Nazis interfered in farm production. Issued silly orders like each hen had to lay 65 eggs a year. Farms could not be split up so one child inherited the farm. It was hard to get cheap labour as many workers left for the city.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Does anyone else see the humor in people like HappyJoy losing their shit on this forum over how conservatives keep voting for smaller government and then turn around and claim that the right creates the unlimited totalitarian governments of fascism?

You're assuming everyone's American, and stupid like you.

These terms come from Europe, and don't fit there like you're saying.

So your position is that the right and left in Europe is different? That would mean something if we were in Europe, stupid. But we’re not. We’re in the U.S. Which means we operate by U.S. measurements, U.S. definitions, and U.S. political terms.

No, I'm saying Europeans coined Left vs Right politics, and still got Left vs Right politics correctly.

While, some Americans like yourself are too stupid to get it correctly, and have been mislead into different political alignments.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

They aren't identical. Fascism is a right wing ideology, period. Communism is a left wing ideology, period.

View attachment 168929

That chart is made up. As right and left are not specifically defined by levels of authoritarianism.

There is nothing made up about the chart. It’s indisputable. The further right you go - government gets smaller and less powerful until it ceases to exist at all (or anarchy). The further left you go - government gets larger and more powerful until it has unlimited power and total control (or totalitarianism - such as fascism, communism, etc.).

This is basic stuff here. Only and idiot or a liar would get it wrong.

Free Markets are economic Liberalism.

We've been through this, but you're a very slow learner...... Due to your pitiful sub-Human intellect levels.

Economic liberalism - Wikipedia

Economic liberalism is an economic system organized on individual lines, which means the greatest possible number of economic decisions are made by individuals or households than by collective institutions or organizations.[1] It includes a spectrum of different economic policies, such as freedom of movement, but its basis is on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition.