The left's selective outrage over constitutional issues.

[Preacher]

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

 

[TheOldSchool]

View attachment 49470

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

Completely different cases that can't be compared, but whatever.

 

[SwimExpert]

California is a "may issue" state. "May-issue" laws are constitutional, according to the Supreme Court. Thus, the Sheriff is conducting legal behavior.

Kim Davis does not have a legal right to refuse to issue marriage licenses. Kentucky does not have a "may issue" statute for marriage licenses.

 

[jwoodie]

If Kim Davis was a gay activist who refused to issue hetero marriage licenses, she would be feted as the ACLU's Martyr of the Year.

 

[SwimExpert]

If Kim Davis was a gay activist who refused to issue hetero marriage licenses, she would be feted as the ACLU's Martyr of the Year.

 

[TheOldSchool]

If Kim Davis was a gay activist who refused to issue hetero marriage licenses, she would be feted as the ACLU's Martyr of the Year.

God you people are stupid...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If Kim Davis was a gay activist who refused to issue hetero marriage licenses, she would be feted as the ACLU's Martyr of the Year.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

And as already correctly noted, this is truly ignorant and ridiculous.

 

[Preacher]

View attachment 49470

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

Completely different cases that can't be compared, but whatever.

Nope both are constitutional issues. Kim's 1st amendment rights are being violated and those 7k people's 2nd amendment rights are being violated AFTER a court ordered the licenses issued.

California is a "may issue" state. "May-issue" laws are constitutional, according to the Supreme Court. Thus, the Sheriff is conducting legal behavior.

Kim Davis does not have a legal right to refuse to issue marriage licenses. Kentucky does not have a "may issue" statute for marriage licenses.

Oh so when its something you liberals agree with it matters what the state has to say but when its something you disagree with it doesn't matter what the state says....please keep being hypocrites. Oh and a judge already ordered that bitch to issue the licenses.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

ODIUM SAID:

"Their silence speaks VOLUMES."

The ignorance and stupidity of most on the right 'speaks volumes.'

 

[TheOldSchool]

View attachment 49470

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

Completely different cases that can't be compared, but whatever.

Nope both are constitutional issues. Kim's 1st amendment rights are being violated and those 7k people's 2nd amendment rights are being violated AFTER a court ordered the licenses issued.

California is a "may issue" state. "May-issue" laws are constitutional, according to the Supreme Court. Thus, the Sheriff is conducting legal behavior.

Kim Davis does not have a legal right to refuse to issue marriage licenses. Kentucky does not have a "may issue" statute for marriage licenses.

Oh so when its something you liberals agree with it matters what the state has to say but when its something you disagree with it doesn't matter what the state says....please keep being hypocrites. Oh and a judge already ordered that bitch to issue the licenses.

Did she comply?

 

[Eaglewings]

View attachment 49470

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

This is Not true and is a very old story that you are trying to twist , plus it was all over the media asshole...the Sheriff is following the California law ...with any story you need to look into the updated facts.

Gun rights in California: Court uncertain about concealed carry laws
" A federal appeals court offered few clues Tuesday as to whether it plans to leave California's strict concealed carry regulations intact, keeping their guns pretty much holstered during key arguments here in a closely watched gun rights legal showdown."

"However, several members of a special 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals signaled that they are inclined to uphold the ability of counties to continue to place restrictions on gun owners to carry concealed weapons in public, despite objections that those rules may trample on Second Amendment rights."
.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

To be honest, meat everyone is selective on constitutional issues but that is the whole point sometimes.

 

[chikenwing]

ODIUM SAID:

"Their silence speaks VOLUMES."

The ignorance and stupidity of most on the right 'speaks volumes.'

So in other words ,ya got nothing

 

[jwoodie]

Is the shallowness of the Libtard responses due to the California drought? Conclusionary one-liners without any factual or logical basis is pathetic, but not unexpected.

 

[Preacher]

During the first few months after her appointment as Sheriff-Coroner, her department sent letters to many concealed weapon permit holders, indicating their intention to revoke those permits. The form letters, sent to over six hundred permit holders, read "The Department has determined that your identified risk does not meet the good cause threshold as required under the new CCW policy based upon the information you provided. As a result of this determination, the Department's present intention is to revoke your CCW license

WOW!

 

[TheOldSchool]

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Liberals think government is going to take their welfare...

 

[Preacher]

NRA-ILA | California: Orange County Sheriff Responds to NRA-CRPA Letter and Agrees Not to Subject Several Hundred Pending CCW Applicants to Strict “Good Cause” Policy

Thanks to the NRA this bitch was SMACKED.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

During the first few months after her appointment as Sheriff-Coroner, her department sent letters to many concealed weapon permit holders, indicating their intention to revoke those permits. The form letters, sent to over six hundred permit holders, read "The Department has determined that your identified risk does not meet the good cause threshold as required under the new CCW policy based upon the information you provided. As a result of this determination, the Department's present intention is to revoke your CCW license

WOW!

She probably plans on revoking a lot of people's licenses for very little reason.

 

[mdk]

Is Odium trying to break the record for the amount threads one person can start about Kim Davis?