The Left's Flirtation with Trumpicide

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
92,200
63,164
2,605
Right coast, classified
Liberalism, philosophically speaking, is proudly unprincipled, insofar as it recognizes no divine law prior to man’s will. The arrogant humanism underpinning liberalism, combined with fallen human nature, makes the temptation to violence irresistible, especially in times of political exile. When safely ensconced in positions of power, liberals demand “civility” and the like (remember the ludicrous “civility” commissions set up during the Clinton era to counter Rush Limbaugh and company). But once out of power, liberals flirt with ends-justify-the-means radicalism.

Many of the heroes of the left are figures of violence — from Fidel Castro and Che Guevera to Bill Ayers and the Black Panthers. The same New York Times that couldn’t bring itself to condemn Trumpicide in the Park ran an article on 9/11 (a grim coincidence) in which Bill Ayers gloated over his unpunished domestic terrorism. “Guilty as hell, free as a bird,” he said.

Obama launched his political career in the living room of this domestic terrorist. Indeed, the new biography on Obama by David Garrow notes the dishonesty of Obama’s attempts to distance himself from Ayers. Garrow confirms that Ayers and Obama were two peas in a pod and much closer friends than Obama ever let on.

Such friendships do not contradict liberalism but reflect it. All of the post-Enlightenment ideologies that inform modern liberalism reject a divinely mandated moral law, which in the end is the only real prohibition on violence. If man’s will is the measure of morality, everything in principle is permitted and politics becomes a game of power that culminates in totalitarianism.



Read it all.

The Left’s Flirtation With Trumpicide
 
Another OP from a 'Dark Money' site, doesn't this baloney ever get tiring. Right wing crazies have made news a fiction and some even believe it.

American Spectator - SourceWatch

MSM is actually improving a bit. Megan Kelly must appreciate the freedom leaving Fox gave her.

"Short of waterboarding him, I don’t know what more Kelly could have done to expose Jones’ dark methods. She was needlessly defensive in her presentation, acknowledging that some people thought the segment shouldn’t have been broadcast because it would increase Jones’ profile. But as she pointed out, Jones isn’t going away, and his audience is growing. What’s more, Jones “has the ear of our president,” and spurious things InfoWars says have a way of getting repeated by his phone-pal President Donald Trump, who has saluted the InfoWars host in the past. She didn’t take Jones down, but really, who could have in a newsmagazine segment? But she did do a credible job of exposing his lies. Give her a B+." Megyn Kelly Pantses Alex Jones


"The supreme mystery of despotism, its prop and stay, is to keep men in a state of deception, and with the specious title of religion to cloak the fear by which they must be held in check, so that they will fight for their servitude as if for salvation." Baruch Spinoza
 
Nobody wants Trump dead. That's a kook lie from the Trump-cult.

Why do they tell it? The Trump cult is trying to justify a fascist crackdown on their political opponents.

The best defense against that fascist tactic is to expose it sunlight, to stop the moral decay from spreading.
 
Another OP from a 'Dark Money' site, doesn't this baloney ever get tiring. Right wing crazies have made news a fiction and some even believe it.

American Spectator - SourceWatch

MSM is actually improving a bit. Megan Kelly must appreciate the freedom leaving Fox gave her.

"Short of waterboarding him, I don’t know what more Kelly could have done to expose Jones’ dark methods. She was needlessly defensive in her presentation, acknowledging that some people thought the segment shouldn’t have been broadcast because it would increase Jones’ profile. But as she pointed out, Jones isn’t going away, and his audience is growing. What’s more, Jones “has the ear of our president,” and spurious things InfoWars says have a way of getting repeated by his phone-pal President Donald Trump, who has saluted the InfoWars host in the past. She didn’t take Jones down, but really, who could have in a newsmagazine segment? But she did do a credible job of exposing his lies. Give her a B+." Megyn Kelly Pantses Alex Jones


"The supreme mystery of despotism, its prop and stay, is to keep men in a state of deception, and with the specious title of religion to cloak the fear by which they must be held in check, so that they will fight for their servitude as if for salvation." Baruch Spinoza
If anyone ever needs corroboration of why the far right is so bat shit crazy all you have to do is look at their media sources and reading material.
Incredibly bizarre outlandish stuff!

I'm sure millions of Trump voters watched Kelly's show last night especially the Alex Jones segment. When they saw how insane he is and found out ( if they didn't know already) that Trump is in bed with the lunatic and actually listens and takes his advice, this had to appall people all around the country.
 
Last edited:
Nobody wants Trump dead. That's a kook lie from the Trump-cult.

Why do they tell it? The Trump cult is trying to justify a fascist crackdown on their political opponents.

The best defense against that fascist tactic is to expose it sunlight, to stop the moral decay from spreading.

Considering we just had a congressperson shot, your statement rings hollow.

Methinks he would have gone for Trump if he could of, he just picked Republican Congress-critters because it was easier.
 
Considering we just had a congressperson shot, your statement rings hollow.

So you're admitting that your side's constant calls for violence against the government were a bad idea? Or are you doubling down and calling for more such violence?

We on the left have always had the moral high ground, and still do, because we've always condemned all violence. Until you start condemning all violence, you'll have no moral standing.
 
Considering we just had a congressperson shot, your statement rings hollow.

So you're admitting that your side's constant calls for violence against the government were a bad idea? Or are you doubling down and calling for more such violence?

We on the left have always had the moral high ground, and still do, because we've always condemned all violence. Until you start condemning all violence, you'll have no moral standing.

What "constant calls for violence"

And your last statement is complete bullshit. What about the Weathermen? What about that Puerto Rican "Freedom fighter" who just got released? What about Eco-terrorists? What about animal rights nuts?

You are a fucking LAIR, and what's worse, you are a bad one.
 
What "constant calls for violence"

Don't play dumb, little brownshirt. Even your fellow fascists are kind of embarrassed when you do that.

And your last statement is complete bullshit. What about the Weathermen? What about that Puerto Rican "Freedom fighter" who just got released? What about Eco-terrorists? What about animal rights nuts?

Ancient history, and all of them combined are just a tiny fraction of the constant ongoing right-wing violence.

You are a fucking LAIR, and what's worse, you are a bad one.

Remember, many of us swore a solemn oath to defend the Constitution from domestic enemies like you. We're not going to abandon that oath just because you cry at us.
 
What "constant calls for violence"

Don't play dumb, little brownshirt. Even your fellow fascists are kind of embarrassed when you do that.

And your last statement is complete bullshit. What about the Weathermen? What about that Puerto Rican "Freedom fighter" who just got released? What about Eco-terrorists? What about animal rights nuts?

Ancient history, and all of them combined are just a tiny fraction of the constant ongoing right-wing violence.

You are a fucking LAIR, and what's worse, you are a bad one.

Remember, many of us swore a solemn oath to defend the Constitution from domestic enemies like you. We're not going to abandon that oath just because you cry at us.

Non-answer noted.

Sweeping ignorance of history noted.

And attempted inference of military service noted, and dismissed.

Fuck off, Troll.
 
Another OP from a 'Dark Money' site, doesn't this baloney ever get tiring. Right wing crazies have made news a fiction and some even believe it.

American Spectator - SourceWatch

MSM is actually improving a bit. Megan Kelly must appreciate the freedom leaving Fox gave her.

"Short of waterboarding him, I don’t know what more Kelly could have done to expose Jones’ dark methods. She was needlessly defensive in her presentation, acknowledging that some people thought the segment shouldn’t have been broadcast because it would increase Jones’ profile. But as she pointed out, Jones isn’t going away, and his audience is growing. What’s more, Jones “has the ear of our president,” and spurious things InfoWars says have a way of getting repeated by his phone-pal President Donald Trump, who has saluted the InfoWars host in the past. She didn’t take Jones down, but really, who could have in a newsmagazine segment? But she did do a credible job of exposing his lies. Give her a B+." Megyn Kelly Pantses Alex Jones


"The supreme mystery of despotism, its prop and stay, is to keep men in a state of deception, and with the specious title of religion to cloak the fear by which they must be held in check, so that they will fight for their servitude as if for salvation." Baruch Spinoza
and then you have the WaPo, how funny is that. oopsss much?
 
Liberalism, philosophically speaking, is proudly unprincipled, insofar as it recognizes no divine law prior to man’s will. The arrogant humanism underpinning liberalism, combined with fallen human nature, makes the temptation to violence irresistible, especially in times of political exile. When safely ensconced in positions of power, liberals demand “civility” and the like (remember the ludicrous “civility” commissions set up during the Clinton era to counter Rush Limbaugh and company). But once out of power, liberals flirt with ends-justify-the-means radicalism.

Many of the heroes of the left are figures of violence — from Fidel Castro and Che Guevera to Bill Ayers and the Black Panthers. The same New York Times that couldn’t bring itself to condemn Trumpicide in the Park ran an article on 9/11 (a grim coincidence) in which Bill Ayers gloated over his unpunished domestic terrorism. “Guilty as hell, free as a bird,” he said.

Obama launched his political career in the living room of this domestic terrorist. Indeed, the new biography on Obama by David Garrow notes the dishonesty of Obama’s attempts to distance himself from Ayers. Garrow confirms that Ayers and Obama were two peas in a pod and much closer friends than Obama ever let on.

Such friendships do not contradict liberalism but reflect it. All of the post-Enlightenment ideologies that inform modern liberalism reject a divinely mandated moral law, which in the end is the only real prohibition on violence. If man’s will is the measure of morality, everything in principle is permitted and politics becomes a game of power that culminates in totalitarianism.



Read it all.

The Left’s Flirtation With Trumpicide
Speak English, dammit.
 
What "constant calls for violence"

Don't play dumb, little brownshirt. Even your fellow fascists are kind of embarrassed when you do that.

And your last statement is complete bullshit. What about the Weathermen? What about that Puerto Rican "Freedom fighter" who just got released? What about Eco-terrorists? What about animal rights nuts?

Ancient history, and all of them combined are just a tiny fraction of the constant ongoing right-wing violence.

You are a fucking LAIR, and what's worse, you are a bad one.

Remember, many of us swore a solemn oath to defend the Constitution from domestic enemies like you. We're not going to abandon that oath just because you cry at us.
so when are you going to post something factual?
 
Fuck off yourself, Marty. We have videos of that fat senile orange clown inciting his followers to do violence against people that did not agree with him. The SOB that shot that Congressman and others was a crazy. Just like Nichols and McViegh were crazies on your end of the spectrum. No defense for any of this type of crazy, no matter what their political opinions are.
 
Liberalism, philosophically speaking, is proudly unprincipled, insofar as it recognizes no divine law prior to man’s will. The arrogant humanism underpinning liberalism, combined with fallen human nature, makes the temptation to violence irresistible, especially in times of political exile. When safely ensconced in positions of power, liberals demand “civility” and the like (remember the ludicrous “civility” commissions set up during the Clinton era to counter Rush Limbaugh and company). But once out of power, liberals flirt with ends-justify-the-means radicalism.

Many of the heroes of the left are figures of violence — from Fidel Castro and Che Guevera to Bill Ayers and the Black Panthers. The same New York Times that couldn’t bring itself to condemn Trumpicide in the Park ran an article on 9/11 (a grim coincidence) in which Bill Ayers gloated over his unpunished domestic terrorism. “Guilty as hell, free as a bird,” he said.

Obama launched his political career in the living room of this domestic terrorist. Indeed, the new biography on Obama by David Garrow notes the dishonesty of Obama’s attempts to distance himself from Ayers. Garrow confirms that Ayers and Obama were two peas in a pod and much closer friends than Obama ever let on.

Such friendships do not contradict liberalism but reflect it. All of the post-Enlightenment ideologies that inform modern liberalism reject a divinely mandated moral law, which in the end is the only real prohibition on violence. If man’s will is the measure of morality, everything in principle is permitted and politics becomes a game of power that culminates in totalitarianism.



Read it all.

The Left’s Flirtation With Trumpicide
Speak English, dammit.
figures you wouldn't understand.
 
Fuck off yourself, Marty. We have videos of that fat senile orange clown inciting his followers to do violence against people that did not agree with him. The SOB that shot that Congressman and others was a crazy. Just like Nichols and McViegh were crazies on your end of the spectrum. No defense for any of this type of crazy, no matter what their political opinions are.
old news socks, ain't you got any new material from your talking points paperwork?
 
Fuck off yourself, Marty. We have videos of that fat senile orange clown inciting his followers to do violence against people that did not agree with him. The SOB that shot that Congressman and others was a crazy. Just like Nichols and McViegh were crazies on your end of the spectrum. No defense for any of this type of crazy, no matter what their political opinions are.

1st:

Nice stealth attempt via not quoting me to let your statement go unanswered.

2nd:

When did Trump incite anyone to kill anyone else? At most he told people to remove disruptors.

3rd.

The big difference is a majority of people on the right don't sympathize or try to explain away what right nutters do. Most of us were happy when McVeigh got executed.
You assholes, on the other hand, are apologists for most lefty attacks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top