The Left keeps losing credibility

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

 

[Siete]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The left hasn't had any credibility for decades.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Agreed, she is a bunch of horseshit.

 

[Correll]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

 

[Siete]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

 

[MarcATL]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

How much credibility did "the Left" have with you BEFORE you read and/or posted this article?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

RACIST!!!

 

[Siete]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

RACIST!!!

RUSSIAN ^^^^^^^ !!!!!

 

[toobfreak]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

You gotta HAVE something before you can ever LOSE IT.

 

[Norman]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Left has credibility to lose?

When?

 

[Some Guy]

I personally am glad the NY Times hired Sarah Jeong and didn't back away from it. I understand the context of her tweets but that's a terrible excuse for them. If you're truly better than those types of people who use inflammatory comments then you wouldn't allow yourself to be lowered to their level. There's a a tried and true saying: never argue with an idiot because they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

So, you've got Sarah Jeong. At best, an easily aggravated and hateful person who'll justify using deplorable language against people who say some stupid, hateful shit. At worst, you've got an unadulterated and unapologetic racist who therefore would likely support forced removal of rights based on skin color.

... and the NY Times doesn't see anything wrong with that. All those things you've ever thought about the NY Times being blatantly biased and inflammatory against certain people... it's that much more confirmed now.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

RACIST!!!

RUSSIAN ^^^^^^^ !!!!!

Actually, I am of British & Irish descent.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

 

[jc456]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

but it is a giant data point. It proves that there is no actual integrity within the company. If one aligns with a position as the NYT has here, then it is obvious that is a belief of theirs. No other way to position it. Had they had actual integrity, they would have told her to take a hike. It's really quite simple. you should get out of the basement friend.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

I agree. The left has no credibility to lose.

 

[Norman]

I personally am glad the NY Times hired Sarah Jeong and didn't back away from it. I understand the context of her tweets but that's a terrible excuse for them. If you're truly better than those types of people who use inflammatory comments then you wouldn't allow yourself to be lowered to their level. There's a a tried and true saying: never argue with an idiot because they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

So, you've got Sarah Jeong. At best, an easily aggravated and hateful person who'll justify using deplorable language against people who say some stupid, hateful shit. At worst, you've got an unadulterated and unapologetic racist who therefore would likely support forced removal of rights based on skin color.

... and the NY Times doesn't see anything wrong with that. All those things you've ever thought about the NY Times being blatantly biased and inflammatory against certain people... it's that much more confirmed now.

What is the context of this?

And who was she responding to that said stupid hateful shit?

(Unless you think she was responding to herself).

 

[Natural Citizen]

Given the fact that both the so-called left and the so-called right have merged in a rather extrmeme center, I think both have lost any credibility.

Right now the most dangerous political faction is the extreme center. Together, they'll have us all in shackles.

 

[Some Guy]

I personally am glad the NY Times hired Sarah Jeong and didn't back away from it. I understand the context of her tweets but that's a terrible excuse for them. If you're truly better than those types of people who use inflammatory comments then you wouldn't allow yourself to be lowered to their level. There's a a tried and true saying: never argue with an idiot because they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

So, you've got Sarah Jeong. At best, an easily aggravated and hateful person who'll justify using deplorable language against people who say some stupid, hateful shit. At worst, you've got an unadulterated and unapologetic racist who therefore would likely support forced removal of rights based on skin color.

... and the NY Times doesn't see anything wrong with that. All those things you've ever thought about the NY Times being blatantly biased and inflammatory against certain people... it's that much more confirmed now.

What is the context of this?

And who was she responding to that said stupid hateful shit?

(Unless you think she was responding to herself).

Even more supportive of my message. The response i saw from the NY Times was them basically saying "oh she was being baited." For one, then don't take the bait. Second: ok, what about when she wasn't being baited?

 

[Mac1958]

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

The Regressive Left has done great harm to the Democratic Party.

Illiberal Leftist Authoritarianism is not very attractive.

Trump's win should have told them something, but they're not listening.
.