- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,193
- 9,178
- 2,030
Okay, I got called an anti-Semite because I was talking about how History is a narrative and not just facts.
My example for this point was that Jews suffered 6 million murders by the Nazis in the period 1933-1945, but that in the US every year billions of animals are murdered for food by humans.
Clearly the number of billions is a lot more than millions, and clearly this is done in a shorter time frame, one year compared to about 12 years.
Most people would see the Holocaust as being far worse than the killing of animals for human consumption. The pure facts would suggest that it's the other way around. The narrative of History here is more important than the facts.
I also got called an anti-Semite because I said I worked for some rich Jews.
I worked at this place which was exclusive for Jews, you could not be a member without being Jews. Also you have to be absolutely loaded. You could not get in without paying what would, to me, be more than I earn in a year, and you'd have to pay a lot more on top of that. Basically, everyone there was at the very least a multi-millionaire, some may have been billionaires.
Well, here's going for a third time of not being anti-Semitic but getting called an anti-Semite, not because I'm anti-Semitic, but because some people find it politically convenient to get their own way by calling people anti-Semitic, not necessarily directly, but more or less.
I also got angry when the Jews managed to get a high school teacher in TAIWAN of all places fired because his school taught kids about the Nazis by doing a little parade.
FA chief Martin Glenn apologises after 'offensive and inappropriate' Star of David and Nazi swastika comparisons
English soccer. Would you believe it?
The top manager in the English league is called Guardiola. He played for and managed Barcelona to great success, and now manages the oil rich Manchester City.
Guardiola is from Catalonia, and he's really pissed with the Spanish government for being a bunch of fuckheads. So he wears a little yellow ribbon thing to show his support.
However, like the NBA has done, politics is to be kept out of sport. The English, Scots, Welsh had a big fight with UEFA over wearing poppies. Sort of political, especially for the Catholics in Ireland. But they won that fight. But they're threatening Guardiola, but he's a little too good for them to get into a full flight.
So, FA chief Martin Glenn basically said:
“We have rewritten Law 4 of the game so that things like a poppy are OK but things that are going to be highly divisive are not.
That could be strong religious symbols, it could be the Star of David, it could the hammer and sickle, it could be a swastika, anything like Robert Mugabe on your shirt – these are the things we don’t want.”
All of a sudden the Jewish Council is on their backs, demanding that this be taken as an insult. Personally I can't see a comparison at all. He talked about religious symbols and included some rather well known symbols. It's not a comparison other than to say they're both symbols, which is fact.
So, we have another example of political pressure being applied in this manner by Jews. They're demanding we never, ever say anything that might be "offensive" to them. Problem is they're easily offended, massively offended.
They're not the only ones. Christians do it, Muslims do it, the Chinese do it all the time.
My example for this point was that Jews suffered 6 million murders by the Nazis in the period 1933-1945, but that in the US every year billions of animals are murdered for food by humans.
Clearly the number of billions is a lot more than millions, and clearly this is done in a shorter time frame, one year compared to about 12 years.
Most people would see the Holocaust as being far worse than the killing of animals for human consumption. The pure facts would suggest that it's the other way around. The narrative of History here is more important than the facts.
I also got called an anti-Semite because I said I worked for some rich Jews.
I worked at this place which was exclusive for Jews, you could not be a member without being Jews. Also you have to be absolutely loaded. You could not get in without paying what would, to me, be more than I earn in a year, and you'd have to pay a lot more on top of that. Basically, everyone there was at the very least a multi-millionaire, some may have been billionaires.
Well, here's going for a third time of not being anti-Semitic but getting called an anti-Semite, not because I'm anti-Semitic, but because some people find it politically convenient to get their own way by calling people anti-Semitic, not necessarily directly, but more or less.
I also got angry when the Jews managed to get a high school teacher in TAIWAN of all places fired because his school taught kids about the Nazis by doing a little parade.
FA chief Martin Glenn apologises after 'offensive and inappropriate' Star of David and Nazi swastika comparisons
English soccer. Would you believe it?
The top manager in the English league is called Guardiola. He played for and managed Barcelona to great success, and now manages the oil rich Manchester City.
Guardiola is from Catalonia, and he's really pissed with the Spanish government for being a bunch of fuckheads. So he wears a little yellow ribbon thing to show his support.
However, like the NBA has done, politics is to be kept out of sport. The English, Scots, Welsh had a big fight with UEFA over wearing poppies. Sort of political, especially for the Catholics in Ireland. But they won that fight. But they're threatening Guardiola, but he's a little too good for them to get into a full flight.
So, FA chief Martin Glenn basically said:
“We have rewritten Law 4 of the game so that things like a poppy are OK but things that are going to be highly divisive are not.
That could be strong religious symbols, it could be the Star of David, it could the hammer and sickle, it could be a swastika, anything like Robert Mugabe on your shirt – these are the things we don’t want.”
All of a sudden the Jewish Council is on their backs, demanding that this be taken as an insult. Personally I can't see a comparison at all. He talked about religious symbols and included some rather well known symbols. It's not a comparison other than to say they're both symbols, which is fact.
So, we have another example of political pressure being applied in this manner by Jews. They're demanding we never, ever say anything that might be "offensive" to them. Problem is they're easily offended, massively offended.
They're not the only ones. Christians do it, Muslims do it, the Chinese do it all the time.
