The Iraq Panel

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Avatar4321, Dec 6, 2006.

  1. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,511
    Thanks Received:
    8,156
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,135
    One of the reporters asked an interesting question and i cant seem to find liberals anywhere who will give a good answer. heck the panel didnt really have a good answer for it.

    The panel has only been in Iraq once, and never left the green zone. Why should the President listen to them and not his commanders on the ground?
     
  2. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    For the President does listen to his Commanders on the ground. But politics don't care about that, it is more about confussion in politial ranks thus making this Iraq Panel un-realistic and a waste of time. If you don't go into harms way how can you claim to be the experts here.
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Because this group claims to have all of this understanding of goverment undeneath it's belt and coincidently are members of groups that have a lot of stock in what happens in the middle east. LITERALLY !!!!! I also thought the "plan" was presented quite pompously at the news conference as if these folks had way more to gain politically.
     
  4. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    This panels suggestions are so underwhelming that I keep wondering what the hell it's all about. They overwhelmingly present themselves as "bipartisan". Is this some way that a plan can be presented by a "bipartisan" group so that no one party will get credit or take responsibilty for what happens if their advice is followed?
     
  5. shepherdboy
    Offline

    shepherdboy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    234
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    The occupied zone(CA.)
    Ratings:
    +34
    This panel makes me sick. James Baker and the so called (Stay in the Green Zone) Panel has done nothing but give the illusion to our enemies that we plan to cut and run and that U.S. foreign policy is weak with the American people unwilling to stomach conflicts. I kept hearing that we could not win this war? You mean our police action. Members of our armed forces annihilated the opposition in a quick show of force. But with all the political correctness our military forces have had their hands tied behind their back from controlling the insurgents with brute overwhelming force. Our men and women are dying from i.e.d.'s and little small ambushes because they are not allowed to engage the enemy with full unleashed might of their resources.

    Just an example and this one really makes my blood boil is the fact that our Marine scout snipers are not allowed stalk or hide. They have to remain visible on roof tops or in the open to be seen as more as a deterrent then a threat by the Iraqi people. Again a police action. These guys were not trained to be seen in the first place, let alone be anchored to one position with out roaming or stalking the enemy.

    The hell with the Panel of cut and run. Allow the Generals to make the call without the political correctness factor.
     
  6. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,885
    Thanks Received:
    1,609
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,158
    This great panel recommend "negotiations". So exactly what are we supposed to bring to the negotiation table? Israel? Is that perhaps the hidden agenda? Throw Israel to the wolves to get them off our backs? Wouldn't be surprised.
     
  7. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    If the Chimpy McPresident actually listened to anyone, or anything, but the voices of his syncophants and the ones in his head, we wold never have invaded Iraq to begin with. But since he failed to listen to the voices of reason, and continues to do so, we are and will continue to be mired in Iraq until Chimpy and his Administration are removed from office. Sorry to burst your bubble.
     
  8. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    And just what would Bully McShit have done? Invade Afghanistan and declare the WOT over? Bin ladens' goal is to recreate the Caliphate. Do you know where he wants to put the Capital ? Insisting our enemies do not exist and are not determined is psychotic.
     
  9. shepherdboy
    Offline

    shepherdboy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    234
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    The occupied zone(CA.)
    Ratings:
    +34
    And who were these people the President was supposed to listen too that had the great insight into having the Iraqi government abide by the U.N. resolutions?

    Was it the same people that even to this day prevent our Armed Forces of the United States from fighting this conflict, with political correctness and both hands tied behind their backs?

    So if you were the President of the United States, how would you deal with Iraq,Iran, N. Korea, Syria, and Afghanistan?
     
  10. OCA
    Offline

    OCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,014
    Thanks Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Washington D.C.
    Ratings:
    +223
    He doesn't listen to his commanders on the ground, only which way the political winds blow does the president heed when it concerns Iraq.
     

Share This Page