The Impeachment ‘Kill Switch’: McConnell Dismissal Rule Corners Dems, Blocks Antics as Trial Starts

[colfax_m]

People don’t like to discuss blow jobs in public

Nor hunter biden

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Not sure what you mean by that

You said something about Avennati in reply to my asking about witnesses.

I’m just listing the witnesses being called. Are you comparing witnesses to Avennati or something else?

 

[edthecynic]

I wonder what they consider a “dishonest, crooked stunt”?

calling witnesses and submitting documents, of course!

 

[Nostra]

 

[The Purge]

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

 

[The Purge]

I wonder what they consider a “dishonest, crooked stunt”?

ANYTHING a DIM DEM would attempt...........

Like calling witnesses...

How many witnesses testified publicly during the Clinton trial?

Zero sound about right?

People don’t like to discuss blow jobs in public

YOU do...but then the debate is are you a PEOPLE?....ROTFLMFAO!

 

[colfax_m]

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

 

[Nostra]

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

How many testified publicly during the Clinton trial?

Zero sound about right?

 

[The Purge]

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You said something about Avennati in reply to my asking about witnesses.

Not true [actually lie would better describe it], you used a typical liberal ploy and reworded what you claimed you said and what I replied to

I’m just listing the witnesses being called. Are you comparing witnesses to Avennati or something else?

Rewording again [Anotehr lie actually], it would be impossible for me to do that since I made the Avenati claim before you posted the list of witnesses...And you are the only one in this conversation who did the ridiculous comparing so that you could shift the conversation away from the example I gave but you want to ignore.

 

[B. Kidd]

I love the term 'kill switch".

Especially when it relates to anti-AMERICAN Dimms!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Unless of course it's a liberal impeachment trial

 

[colfax_m]

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.

 

[colfax_m]

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Unless of course it's a liberal impeachment trial

What do you mean? Liberals are the ones trying to convince conservatives to call witnesses.

 

[The Original Tree]

It’s not a trial.

1.) No violations of US Code were even committed.

2.) The only responsibility The Senate has is to review The Evidence The House Presented to them and vote HR 1 up or down.

Like calling witnesses...

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

 

[colfax_m]

You said something about Avennati in reply to my asking about witnesses.

Not true [actually lie would better describe it], you used a typical liberal ploy and reworded what you claimed you said and what I replied to

I’m just listing the witnesses being called. Are you comparing witnesses to Avennati or something else?

Rewording again [Anotehr lie actually], it would be impossible for me to do that since I made the Avenati claim before you posted the list of witnesses...And you are the only one in this conversation who did the ridiculous comparing so that you could shift the conversation away from the example I gave but you want to ignore.

I have no idea how to decipher your statements. Sorry, I’m not reading your mind.

 

[Nostra]

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.

Clinton's trial had 3. All testified behind closed doors, and the Dimwingers released the excerpts they wanted to.

You good with that this time around?

 

[The Original Tree]

That’s not actually true, and The Senate Review of The House Evidence doe not require anyone to interview any additional witnesses.

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.

 

[B. Kidd]

An avenatti type of character would absolutely qualify.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.

Only in bi-partisan impeachment trials, cooter.
And this ain't one of em'!
The Senate has this one covered...

 

[The Original Tree]

These were not actually witnesses. They were persons who submitted written statements and they were asked to expound on them behind closed doors.

Not sure what you mean by that.

Schumer has asked for 4 witnesses.
Mulvaney
Bolton
Blair
Duffey

Any reason you can think of that we shouldn’t hear from any of these people?

Sure asshole. That was the Houses Job, trial is Senates job, NOT CALLING WITNESSES....Seems PENCIL NECK FUCKED UP!!!

Last time I checked, witnesses are called at trials.

Are they not?

Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!

No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.

Clinton's trial had 3. All testified behind closed doors, and the Dimwingers released the excerpts they wanted to.

You good with that this time around?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

I have no idea how to decipher your statements.

Comprehension works best

Sorry, I’m not reading your mind.

nor my posts