Good old SSDD. He has no sources that back up his one-way flow of radiation, but he knows
that the Handbook of Modern Sensors was fooled.
I have the second law of thermodynamics which states that it is not possible for energy to flow spontaneously from a cool object to a warm object....you have opinions, and occasionally a drawing illustrating an unobservable, unmeasurable, untestable mathematical model. So in the end, what do you have? Nothing...In the end what do I have? The second law of thermodynamics saying that it isn't possible for energy to move spontaneously from cool to warm. Who has the better source? You with some opinions and a few drawings illustrating the opinions or me with the second law of thermodynamics?
I have the second law of thermodynamics which states that it is not possible for energy to flow spontaneously from a cool object to a warm object..
You have the second law of thermodynamics which you misinterpret to state that it is not possible for photons to flow spontaneously from a cool object to a warm object.
you have opinions, and occasionally a drawing illustrating an unobservable, unmeasurable, untestable mathematical model.
It's hilarious that a source you originally referenced, The Handbook of Modern Sensors, shows that energy flows from a sensor to its target and from the target to the sensor. At the same time.
The second law of thermodynamics saying that it isn't possible for energy to move spontaneously from cool to warm. Who has the better source?
If you were correct, energy on the Sun's surface would be "trapped" by the hotter corona.
If you were correct, energy on the Earth's surface would be "trapped" by the hotter thermosphere.