- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
“The majority of weather stations used by NOAA to detect climate change temperature signal have been compromised by encroachment of artificial surfaces like concrete, asphalt, and heat sources like air conditioner exhausts,” Anthony Watts, a seasoned meteorologist and lead author of the study, said in a statement Thursday.
“If you want the truth about an issue, would you go to an agency with political appointees?” Christy said. “The government is not the final word on the truth.”
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On ‘Compromised’ Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
But the entire premise of global warming is based on this published number:
Averaged over all land and ocean surfaces, temperatures warmed roughly 1.53°F (0.85ºC) from 1880 to 2012.
How much has the global temperature risen in the last 100 years? | UCAR - University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Then when you take in the FACTS that the thermometers from 1880 to at least the 1990s had these issues:
How well can you distinctly read the difference between 72˚ and 73˚?
Then when you have to write the reading down, transcribe, transcribe transcribe to a central data gathering site BEFORE computers... this is what you get:
Explain to me how over the million plus readings since 1880 that had to be handwritten data entries before computers could have been accurate to achieve the distinct 1.53˚ global warming?
“If you want the truth about an issue, would you go to an agency with political appointees?” Christy said. “The government is not the final word on the truth.”
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On ‘Compromised’ Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
But the entire premise of global warming is based on this published number:
Averaged over all land and ocean surfaces, temperatures warmed roughly 1.53°F (0.85ºC) from 1880 to 2012.
How much has the global temperature risen in the last 100 years? | UCAR - University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Then when you take in the FACTS that the thermometers from 1880 to at least the 1990s had these issues:
How well can you distinctly read the difference between 72˚ and 73˚?
Then when you have to write the reading down, transcribe, transcribe transcribe to a central data gathering site BEFORE computers... this is what you get:
Explain to me how over the million plus readings since 1880 that had to be handwritten data entries before computers could have been accurate to achieve the distinct 1.53˚ global warming?