Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
then you are very very uninformed on purpose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still refusing to explain in your own words what you claim I dont understand?
Tell me what Pareto found about the assets in his own country?
that 80% of the land was owned by 20% of the people. He found that the same was true everywhere. He didn't say or observe that was a bad thing, just the way it is.
Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
You haven't explained jack shit...You've merely linked to a goofy Wiki link that you cannot possibly comprehend and said "SEE!?!?...SEE!?!?"I already explained the problem you just never listen
I stand corrected.Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
Actually, nearly 40% with state and local spending added to the total - much of it mandated by the Feds.
What unfettered markets?Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
dear one the country was all about unfettered markets at the time which created the problem
I stand corrected.Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
Actually, nearly 40% with state and local spending added to the total - much of it mandated by the Feds.
But somehow or another, this is all the fault of them eeeeeviilll rich people.
Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
Actually, nearly 40% with state and local spending added to the total - much of it mandated by the Feds.
Ahhh, the onset of the socialistic "progressive era"...Back when gubmint only consumed about 3% of GDP.
Now it consumes in excess if 1/4 of American GDP, while the progressives snivel and wring their hands over the "shocking" (well, to them anyways) accumulation of wealth by those at the very top.
Coincidence?...I think not.
Actually, nearly 40% with state and local spending added to the total - much of it mandated by the Feds.
True, and quite a few progressives types that I know will harken back to WW2 and tell us all that it ain't really bad at all right now....as they draw comparisons to GDP at 120%. The problem is that they're arguing two equations with different variables. 40 percent GDP is disgusting.
Actually, nearly 40% with state and local spending added to the total - much of it mandated by the Feds.
True, and quite a few progressives types that I know will harken back to WW2 and tell us all that it ain't really bad at all right now....as they draw comparisons to GDP at 120%. The problem is that they're arguing two equations with different variables. 40 percent GDP is disgusting.
During WWII we didn't have massive entitlement and government pension liabilities that were off the books liabilities either.
If the government held itself to the same standards that it did Enron, it would have to arrest itself for accounting fraud.
JP Morgan benefited greatly from gubmint-granted rights-of-way and mineral rights.....Hardly laissez-faire.
Try again.