The FBI said they found no evidence that her server was hacked.... I suppose it could have been, without them being able to tell, if they had real expert hackers.we know that the Clinton server was not hacked, the FBI went through it with a fine tooth comb....fbi stated it was not hacked... if she had used the State Dept system, we know that State.gov gets hacked over 40,000 attempt's and infiltrations a year.... ironically, her unknown server email, might have actually protected us all.....sigh....
1-The FBI notified the Clinton Campaign IT mgr in late 2015 that Russian operatives were trying to access their files... the IT manager did not heed to their warnings....the FBI cyber division was aware of the Russian hackers and notified the campaign, BEFORE the campaign / DNC emails were hacked, that someone was trying to hack them.
2-Papadopolous in March or April of 2016 was told by a Russian operative that the Russians had dirt on Hillary, thousands of campaign emails. This was 3 months BEFORE Guccifer claimed he got the hacked emails, and this techie called Forensicator intentionally or mistakenly used what transmitted to/from Guccifer on July 5th, for his analysis....Guccifer was a third party to try to hide where the hacks originated.
3- The FBI received a copy of the server, along with CrowdStrike's analysis....which was good enough, coupled with the information the FBI had gathered that they tried to warn the campaign IT mgr about
4- In addition to this, cyber security is a doggy dog world....competition is steep....the cyber firms often cut each other's throats in policing one another... 5 competitive cyber security firms agreed with crowd strike's analysis based on their own information they had gathered on it.
When Papadopolous was told by somebody that the Russians had dirt on Hillary, how do you know if it was thousands of campaign emails? How do you know it wasn't some of those 30,000+ emails that might've been hacked from that unsecured server she had in her basement while she was SoS? Guccifer's hacked emails were not from the DNC, they were from Hillary's unsecured server years before.
I do not believe this is true. I'll need to see the link where the FBI stated that her unsecured server was not hacked. After she cleaned it with a rag, bleached it, and beat the hell out of it with a hammer, they would know that? And to say that her unsecured server was unknown? BULLSHIT. Guccifer knew, and you can bet your ass a whole lot of other people knew too, and most of them are not our friends. And then to say that unprotected server might actually have protected us all from hacking? ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT! We know that attempts to hack the US State Dept and other federal agencies probably number in the thousands, but that doesn't mean they were successful.
However, it has been 6 years since she used that server, and 6 years since she has been secretary of State, and if someone had hacked her server and gotten her emails, WHY HAVEN'T THEY SHOWED UP??? Why didn't they leak during the campaign and the year and a half since?
If Trump moves to prosecute Clinton, what's known on emails?
Comey noted in his statement that there was no "direct evidence" that Clinton’s servers had been hacked...