The FBI was actually trying to ‘Protect Trump’

[IM2]

Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”

Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”

What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.

Why would the Democrats object to an FBI informer being in their campaign if there were members of the campaign suspected of being Russian agents?

Or more specifically- why does Trump object to the FBI investigating possible Russian spies in his campaign?

Clapper 2 days ago said they did not spy on Trump or his people, they were just watching to see if the Russians were poking around. So they should have told Trump

-Geaux

Trump had been informed of what the Russians were doing.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”

Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”

What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.

Why would the Democrats object to an FBI informer being in their campaign if there were members of the campaign suspected of being Russian agents?

Or more specifically- why does Trump object to the FBI investigating possible Russian spies in his campaign?

Clapper 2 days ago said they did not spy on Trump or his people, they were just watching to see if the Russians were poking around. So they should have told Trump

-Geaux

Trump had been informed of what the Russians were doing.

/----/ Impossible, because Obozo told Putin to cut it out.
Obama says he told Putin to 'cut it out' on Russia hacking - POLITICO
Obama says he told Putin to ‘cut it out’ on Russia hacking
Dec 16, 2016 - President Barack Obama said Friday that he told Russian President Vladimir Putin in September to “cut it out” in regard to allegations that his ...

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”

Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”

What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.

Why would the Democrats object to an FBI informer being in their campaign if there were members of the campaign suspected of being Russian agents?

Or more specifically- why does Trump object to the FBI investigating possible Russian spies in his campaign?

Clapper 2 days ago said they did not spy on Trump or his people, they were just watching to see if the Russians were poking around. So they should have told Trump

-Geaux

Its so fucking outrageous. Had Bush spied on Soros's Kenyan born sock puppet, there would be blood in the streets.

What Kenyan?

/----/ Go back to sleep.

 

[Leo123]

The FBI, when investigating Trump, are pursuing an arch criminal.

No need to explain to his followers, for they approve of his criminal behavior.

Criminals flock together.

There is no proof of any criminal behavior by Trump however, there IS evidence of criminal behavior by Hillary Clinton. Her lackey Comey let her off just like he did decades ago....

Comey Tied To Clintons' Money | Roger Stone | Stone Cold Truth

"James Comey has been connected to the Clinton criminal network for decades. In 1996, James Comey acted as the deputy special counsel for the Senate committee investigating the Whitewater scandal. The Senate was investigating shady real-estate loans authorized while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. (via ABC News)"


"Many people connected to the Whitewater company were arrested and charged with over 40 crimes, yet the Clintons remained unscathed. James Comey acknowledged that Hillary Clinton obstructed the investigation and destroyed evidence, yet he decided not to prosecute due to lack of “intent”."

That there in red.....Sound somewhat familiar?

And you really think we should be as stupid as to believe something coming from Roger Stone or anything associated with him.

I think you are stupid to deny FACTS.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

So they should have an entire division to investigate Hillary and the Dems

No they should not. Not based on any of this.

Seriously? Hillary took $150,000,000 from the Russians. She should be under surveillance 24/7/365

 

[IM2]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

So they should have an entire division to investigate Hillary and the Dems

No they should not. Not based on any of this.

Seriously? Hillary took $150,000,000 from the Russians. She should be under surveillance 24/7/365

150 million? And what else is Hannity telling you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

So they should have an entire division to investigate Hillary and the Dems

No they should not. Not based on any of this.

Seriously? Hillary took $150,000,000 from the Russians. She should be under surveillance 24/7/365

150 million? And what else is Hannity telling you?

Not including the Bitcoins

 

[IM2]

The FBI, when investigating Trump, are pursuing an arch criminal.

No need to explain to his followers, for they approve of his criminal behavior.

Criminals flock together.

There is no proof of any criminal behavior by Trump however, there IS evidence of criminal behavior by Hillary Clinton. Her lackey Comey let her off just like he did decades ago....

Comey Tied To Clintons' Money | Roger Stone | Stone Cold Truth

"James Comey has been connected to the Clinton criminal network for decades. In 1996, James Comey acted as the deputy special counsel for the Senate committee investigating the Whitewater scandal. The Senate was investigating shady real-estate loans authorized while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. (via ABC News)"


"Many people connected to the Whitewater company were arrested and charged with over 40 crimes, yet the Clintons remained unscathed. James Comey acknowledged that Hillary Clinton obstructed the investigation and destroyed evidence, yet he decided not to prosecute due to lack of “intent”."

That there in red.....Sound somewhat familiar?

And you really think we should be as stupid as to believe something coming from Roger Stone or anything associated with him.

I think you are stupid to deny FACTS.

When you have some facts I won't deny them.

 

[Leo123]

The FBI, when investigating Trump, are pursuing an arch criminal.

No need to explain to his followers, for they approve of his criminal behavior.

Criminals flock together.

There is no proof of any criminal behavior by Trump however, there IS evidence of criminal behavior by Hillary Clinton. Her lackey Comey let her off just like he did decades ago....

Comey Tied To Clintons' Money | Roger Stone | Stone Cold Truth

"James Comey has been connected to the Clinton criminal network for decades. In 1996, James Comey acted as the deputy special counsel for the Senate committee investigating the Whitewater scandal. The Senate was investigating shady real-estate loans authorized while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. (via ABC News)"


"Many people connected to the Whitewater company were arrested and charged with over 40 crimes, yet the Clintons remained unscathed. James Comey acknowledged that Hillary Clinton obstructed the investigation and destroyed evidence, yet he decided not to prosecute due to lack of “intent”."

That there in red.....Sound somewhat familiar?

And you really think we should be as stupid as to believe something coming from Roger Stone or anything associated with him.

I think you are stupid to deny FACTS.

When you have some facts I won't deny them.

I gave you facts with a quote, you chose to not only deny them but trashed the link I provided. Look, if you refuse to listen to facts because you don't like where they come from and don't bother to crosscheck, that is your problem. Show me where the facts I provided are wrong and a source to refute them otherwise, you're just trolling.

 

[edward37]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

Seems to me they let out before election they were investigating Hillary BUT never let out Dump was being investigated too Helped the moron become president

 

[jillian]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

They did investigate Hillary's criminality, Jake. It ain't over yet and Hillary is going to pay. Nothing is ever over until the fat lady sings.

I have no trouble with that.

And I fully expect Trump to take the fall for what he has and is doing.

/——/ How would you like to lose your job over fake allegations and zero proof?

Aren't you making a pretty big assumption about Jake, here, dude?

Had you said "how would you like to get kicked out of mom and dad's basement" I'd be right there, but his losing a job?

Highly unlikely.

He’s projecting

 

[Dogmaphobe]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

They did investigate Hillary's criminality, Jake. It ain't over yet and Hillary is going to pay. Nothing is ever over until the fat lady sings.

I have no trouble with that.

And I fully expect Trump to take the fall for what he has and is doing.

/——/ How would you like to lose your job over fake allegations and zero proof?

Aren't you making a pretty big assumption about Jake, here, dude?

Had you said "how would you like to get kicked out of mom and dad's basement" I'd be right there, but his losing a job?

Highly unlikely.

He’s projecting

To which "he" are you referring?

 

[westwall]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

Agreed, but they were trying to instigate it. Completely different. But you already know that now don't you, fakey...

 

[IM2]

Did James Comey Take Millions from the Clinton Foundation?
No evidence suggests that former FBI Director James Comey financially benefited from Bill and Hillary Clinton's charitable foundation.

On 10 September 2016, the Breitbart web site posted a story delineating a set of alleged financial ties between FBI Director James Comey and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, whom the Bureau had investigated for using a private server to handle sensitive e-mails in her capacity as secretary of state. Federal prosecutors ultimately declined to file charges, which has inspired accusations of bias on the part of Comey.

Although the article from Breitbart (masters at using incomplete and misleading information to suggest improper financial ties and relationships where none exist) didn’t provide any “smoking gun” showing that Comey was personally involved with any of his previous employers’ doings with the Clintons’ charitable foundation, the story has been picked up and spread through the conservative blogosphere with headlines asserting Comey was essentially bribed to clear Clinton of criminal actions.

The Breitbart article linked Comey to the Clinton Foundation through a series of circumstances without ever coming close to proving that Comey received money directly from Bill and Hillary Clinton’s charitable foundation. It also hinted at malfeasance on the part of Comey’s brother, Peter, who is employed in some capacity by the global law firm DLA Piper. DLA Piper reportedly performed an independent audit of the Clinton Foundation, yet Breitbart doesn’t document that Peter Comey had anything to do with the audit.

The article featured a collection of Internet searches combing through Comey’s professional history and the Clinton Foundation’s online listing of donors to suggest some tie between the two datasets (of which there was none other than of the tenuous variety):

How much money did James Comey make from Lockheed Martin in his last year with the company, which he left in 2010? More than $6 million in compensation.

Lockheed Martin is a Clinton Foundation donor. The company admitted to becoming a Clinton Global Initiative member in 2010.

According to records, Lockheed Martin is also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.

In 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department.

The story moved on to Comey’s joining the board of London-based bank, HSBC, in 2013 and how HSBC had “partnered with Deutsche Bank through the Clinton Foundation to ‘retrofit 1,500 to 2,500 housing units, primarily in the low- to moderate-income sector'” in New York. The story also cited a Washington Examiner article that stated the DLA Piper firm performed an audit on the Clinton Foundation and was a Foundation donor as well.

The Breitbart story failed to document that James Comey’s brother was involved in (or had any tangible connection to) DLA Piper’s independent audit of the Clinton Foundation. If the story’s own statement that Peter Comey works as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” is true, it doesn’t seem likely he would have taken part in the auditing of a charitable foundation. It also doesn’t explain how James Comey would have had a vested interest in the outcome of the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton. The article went so far as to note that James once lent his brother money for a home mortgage but didn’t provide any remotely credible explanation for how a loan between siblings would suggest any form of wrongdoing.

The story implied that James Comey’s once having worked for organizations that were donors or had partnered with the Clinton Foundation in some capacity was proof enough that he was biased in favor of Hillary Clinton when his bureau investigated her for her mishandling of sensitive information, and it alleged a conflict of interest due to his brother’s employment in a large law firm that audited the Clinton Foundation. But the evidence offered in support of those charges was nothing more than extremely questionable supposition based on a weak form of guilt by association — all based not on any actual investigation, but on simply collating information deftly “hidden” by the alleged conspirators in online news stories and the Clinton Foundation’s own web site.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/comey-clinton-foundation/

Be careful of what you ask for. These are the facts.

​

 

[Leo123]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

Seems to me they let out before election they were investigating Hillary BUT never let out Dump was being investigated too Helped the moron become president

Excuses, excuses....Do you work for Hillary?

 

[Leo123]

Did James Comey Take Millions from the Clinton Foundation?
No evidence suggests that former FBI Director James Comey financially benefited from Bill and Hillary Clinton's charitable foundation.

On 10 September 2016, the Breitbart web site posted a story delineating a set of alleged financial ties between FBI Director James Comey and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, whom the Bureau had investigated for using a private server to handle sensitive e-mails in her capacity as secretary of state. Federal prosecutors ultimately declined to file charges, which has inspired accusations of bias on the part of Comey.

Although the article from Breitbart (masters at using incomplete and misleading information to suggest improper financial ties and relationships where none exist) didn’t provide any “smoking gun” showing that Comey was personally involved with any of his previous employers’ doings with the Clintons’ charitable foundation, the story has been picked up and spread through the conservative blogosphere with headlines asserting Comey was essentially bribed to clear Clinton of criminal actions.

The Breitbart article linked Comey to the Clinton Foundation through a series of circumstances without ever coming close to proving that Comey received money directly from Bill and Hillary Clinton’s charitable foundation. It also hinted at malfeasance on the part of Comey’s brother, Peter, who is employed in some capacity by the global law firm DLA Piper. DLA Piper reportedly performed an independent audit of the Clinton Foundation, yet Breitbart doesn’t document that Peter Comey had anything to do with the audit.

The article featured a collection of Internet searches combing through Comey’s professional history and the Clinton Foundation’s online listing of donors to suggest some tie between the two datasets (of which there was none other than of the tenuous variety):

How much money did James Comey make from Lockheed Martin in his last year with the company, which he left in 2010? More than $6 million in compensation.

Lockheed Martin is a Clinton Foundation donor. The company admitted to becoming a Clinton Global Initiative member in 2010.

According to records, Lockheed Martin is also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.

In 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department.

The story moved on to Comey’s joining the board of London-based bank, HSBC, in 2013 and how HSBC had “partnered with Deutsche Bank through the Clinton Foundation to ‘retrofit 1,500 to 2,500 housing units, primarily in the low- to moderate-income sector'” in New York. The story also cited a Washington Examiner article that stated the DLA Piper firm performed an audit on the Clinton Foundation and was a Foundation donor as well.

The Breitbart story failed to document that James Comey’s brother was involved in (or had any tangible connection to) DLA Piper’s independent audit of the Clinton Foundation. If the story’s own statement that Peter Comey works as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” is true, it doesn’t seem likely he would have taken part in the auditing of a charitable foundation. It also doesn’t explain how James Comey would have had a vested interest in the outcome of the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton. The article went so far as to note that James once lent his brother money for a home mortgage but didn’t provide any remotely credible explanation for how a loan between siblings would suggest any form of wrongdoing.

The story implied that James Comey’s once having worked for organizations that were donors or had partnered with the Clinton Foundation in some capacity was proof enough that he was biased in favor of Hillary Clinton when his bureau investigated her for her mishandling of sensitive information, and it alleged a conflict of interest due to his brother’s employment in a large law firm that audited the Clinton Foundation. But the evidence offered in support of those charges was nothing more than extremely questionable supposition based on a weak form of guilt by association — all based not on any actual investigation, but on simply collating information deftly “hidden” by the alleged conspirators in online news stories and the Clinton Foundation’s own web site.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/comey-clinton-foundation/

Be careful of what you ask for. These are the facts.

​

It's called collusion, surely lefties should understand that concept.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Muslim half-Kenyan foreign born Obama is five times the American president Trump ever could be.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Clapper is trustworthy.

Trump is not.

 

[edward37]

"Planting a spy" is inflammatory lying demagoguery.

The FBI is supposed to investigate criminality.

Seems to me they let out before election they were investigating Hillary BUT never let out Dump was being investigated too Helped the moron become president

Excuses, excuses....Do you work for Hillary?

NO I 'm a spy working for trump

 

[JakeStarkey]

The FBI, when investigating Trump, are pursuing an arch criminal.

No need to explain to his followers, for they approve of his criminal behavior.

Criminals flock together.

There is no proof of any criminal behavior by Trump however, there IS evidence of criminal behavior by Hillary Clinton. Her lackey Comey let her off just like he did decades ago....

Comey Tied To Clintons' Money | Roger Stone | Stone Cold Truth

"James Comey has been connected to the Clinton criminal network for decades. In 1996, James Comey acted as the deputy special counsel for the Senate committee investigating the Whitewater scandal. The Senate was investigating shady real-estate loans authorized while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. (via ABC News)"


"Many people connected to the Whitewater company were arrested and charged with over 40 crimes, yet the Clintons remained unscathed. James Comey acknowledged that Hillary Clinton obstructed the investigation and destroyed evidence, yet he decided not to prosecute due to lack of “intent”."

That there in red.....Sound somewhat familiar?

And you really think we should be as stupid as to believe something coming from Roger Stone or anything associated with him.

I think you are stupid to deny FACTS.

When you have some facts I won't deny them.

I gave you facts with a quote, you chose to not only deny them but trashed the link I provided. Look, if you refuse to listen to facts because you don't like where they come from and don't bother to crosscheck, that is your problem. Show me where the facts I provided are wrong and a source to refute them otherwise, you're just trolling.

You gave us your misopinion of those statement, in which you are demagoguing far away from the truth.