- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,025
- 2,190
They force the issue because for them it's not about tolerance. It's about eradicating Christians and all ppl who don't share their world view. California democrats are trying to remove all traditional marriage references (the terms husband and wife) from the law. That's not equality, it's eradication.Including the baker? Isn't the baker simply having their " feelings hurt" by making the cake?
No, the baker is placed in involuntary servitude.
You are a leftist, thus dedicated to the eradication of civil rights, so the act of placing enemies of the party in defacto slavery pleases you.
Defacto slavery? Involuntary servitude?
I think if you offer your services to the public then your servitude is quite voluntary.
???? Dear Hutch Starskey
* So if camera operators agree to provide filming services to the public,
if a porn director seeks to hire them to shoot hard core porn,
they cannot turn down that work? They have to do whatever someone offers to hire them to film?
Really?
* If your publishing house prints magazines, then if someone hires you to publish porn, you HAVE to print it?
You cannot turn it anyone down because you are a business open to the public?
* If a maid offers to clean houses,
then if your house is filled with dirty condoms and dog feces,
that maid HAS to do the work if you offer to hire those services?
And cannot turn you down for any reason?
Since these house cleaning services are offered to the public?
What happened to common sense and courtesy? Where does it end?
And if it only applies to gay/lesbian discrimination, isn't that special rights?
This has got to be the most irrational argument I've read so far. How do you even address such stupidity?
Hi Carla_Danger
A. I understand nobody wants to go around having discrimination disguised under some religious excuse.
I understand nobody want the religious argument abused to break the law, similar to claiming "conscientious objection" in order to dodge the draft. Or claiming to be acting as a religious nonprofit to evade taxes.
B. However, in these cases where there are EQUAL beliefs that are pro gay as anti gay,
these groups should STAY AWAY FROM EACH OTHER to avoid mutual imposition.
If we had Hindus and Muslims with conflicting beliefs on beef and pork, they'd be advised don't go into each other's restaurants and raise some dispute in order to invoke a lawsuit for discrimination. If you know you have different beliefs you can STAY AWAY to avoid what you KNOW are conflicting BELIEFS.
What is causing this problem is legislating or ruling through govt for one side or the other.
That is NOT NEUTRAL and thus causes a sense of discrimination for the side excluded, denied or punished.
If we agree to keep govt, laws, rulings and public policy NEUTRAL
then NEITHER side would feel discriminated against.
This is like Forcing the issue, then complaining about the discrimination it causes.
Well, duh! Why force the issue to begin with??? That's what makes no sense here.