The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency

[Freewill]

Really left wingers, can't you do any better?

The news today about the Clintons all fleshes out, in one way or another, their lack of interest in policing serious conflict-of-interest problems that arise in their overlapping roles:

• The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.
• The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.
• The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.”
• And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.”

The Clinton campaign is batting down the darkest and most conspiratorial interpretation of these stories, and where this all leads remains to be seen. But the most positive interpretation is not exactly good.

The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency -- NYMag

 

[Moonglow]

The Russians bought the mines from a Canadian company....

 

[JakeStarkey]

• The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Cleared by 11 US agencies over which SOS had no control
• The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative. So what? Not a crime, not a moral issue
• The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.” What other big names, Dem and Pub, did these entities donate to?
• And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.” Good for Reuters: keep the Clintons on their toes

 

[DarkFury]

The Russians bought the mines from a Canadian company....

From the link, looks like she refuses to comply with presidential orders as well. Hmm?
The Obama administration wanted Hillary Clinton to use official government email. She didn’t. The Obama administration also demandedthat the Clinton Foundation disclose all its donors while she served as Secretary of State. It didn’t comply with that request, either.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are running your mouth, dorky fuzzle, without any proof.

 

[Rocko]

The Russians bought the mines from a Canadian company....

Uranium one owned tens of thousand of acres of US land, and because they did the acquisition to the Ruskis had to be approved by guess who?

 

[DarkFury]

You are running your mouth, dorky fuzzle, without any proof.

Link is in the OP. Top of the thread. Try again but try HARDER okay? WE adults get tired of waiting on you.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I dismantled your 'proof' in a post above. Do you have a secret plan for us in this thread, like you did not in the other?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Really left wingers, can't you do any better?

The news today about the Clintons all fleshes out, in one way or another, their lack of interest in policing serious conflict-of-interest problems that arise in their overlapping roles:

• The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.
• The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.
• The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.”
• And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.”

The Clinton campaign is batting down the darkest and most conspiratorial interpretation of these stories, and where this all leads remains to be seen. But the most positive interpretation is not exactly good.

The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency -- NYMag

Dutifully catapulting more propaganda, Faithful Lackey?