The best governments (for the people) are careful blends of collectivist and capitalist systems. Nothing will ever be perfect, and there will always be abuses, but for the majority of the citizens involved, those are the governments that work best.I'm not clear, are you referring to the government checks I referred to on capitalism or are you referring to wanting collectivism blended in?
So what in your mind justifies government taking property by force from one citizen and giving it to another citizen? I'm thinking to earn the total support of the citizen who was given someone else's property.
We, as people, and not baboons, engage in a social contract when we decide to live together within a community. One of the jobs of government is to provide for the common defense. You or I can sit at our homestead and guard our property all day long, and all night long. Won't get too much work done in a situation like that though. Will we? So we contract with government to provide an Army to guard our borders. We also charge the government to do a whole host of things that are neccessary, like building roads, providing a mail service etc.
Someone a long time ago told me that "nobody gets nothin' fer free" so as part of the contract with the government is the ability for it to levy taxes that are used to pay for the services that provide for our common defense.
There is loads of abuse going on, don't get me wrong, but the social contract, and the necessary method of paying for it is both well known, logical, and proper.