P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #1,081
Their very existence is the “evidence”. Their entire existence is predicated on “Global Warming” being real. If they report that all is well, they have to go work a real job tomorrow.I find it interesting that you defend Lindzen when there is clear evidence that he has a conflict of interest but condemn every other climate scientist on the planet when you have no evidence against them whatsoever.
Whether Lindzen says “Global Warming” is real or a hoax, he still has a job either way. It amazes me you can’t see the difference here.