The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

Who are basing their beliefs on computer modeling while ignoring empirical climate data.
That is simply false.

Guess what these are?
2337


CO2_emissions_vs_concentrations_1751-2022.png


4ubuX.jpg



The-downwelling-longwave-radiance-spectrum-from-2-January-2007-at-Eureka-Canada-for-a.png


EMPIRICAL DATA SUPPORTING THE THEORY OF AGW
 
You keep ignoring the polar regions being thermally isolated from warmer marine currents and the impact that has on climate fluctuations due to altering the threshold temperature for glaciation at the poles. It is the single biggest driver of the planet's climate. And it has cause the planet's climate to fluctuate greatly. You are mistaking natural climate variability for AGW.
You repeat your claim once again without a fucking HINT of explanation.
 
Berkeley Earth is notable, too, as it was set up by deniers and was meant to debunk the others.
 
LOL So all the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major Universities in the world do not understand science? For they all state that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. So what we see posited here is a conspiracy by most of the scientists in the world, irregardless of nation or culture, to deceive the rest of us. And nobody in those millions of scientists is squealing on the rest, or telling what the purpose of the deception is. LOL

Stock up on extra tinfoil for your little hats, fellows.
And, since 1970 their predictions have never come true. So, take your scientists and shove it where the sun don’t shine.
 
You repeat your claim once again without a fucking HINT of explanation.
It amazes me that you’ve had thousands of data points shoved down your throat proving that “Global Warming” is a hoax and you still can’t bring yourself to admit that you were duped.

Which is why I now realize you weren’t “duped”. You’re one of the grifting dirt-bags trying to cash in on this hoax. How much are you invested in “green” company scams? Tell the truth for once.
 
Berkeley Earth is notable, too, as it was set up by deniers and was meant to debunk the others.
In particular, BEST was convinced that UHI was being inappropriately handled and was responsible for much of the observed warming. They found precisely the opposite.
 
That is simply false.

Guess what these are?
2337


CO2_emissions_vs_concentrations_1751-2022.png


4ubuX.jpg



The-downwelling-longwave-radiance-spectrum-from-2-January-2007-at-Eureka-Canada-for-a.png


EMPIRICAL DATA SUPPORTING THE THEORY OF AGW
Natural climate variations which the geologic record is littered with.
 
Natural climate variations which the geologic record is littered with.
Are you by chance suffering from severe short term memory loss?

These are EMPIRICAL DATA that in post #1120 you just claimed climate scientists were ignoring. Should we call that a lie or simply an ignorant mistake? I'm leaning towards "lie". I mean, you've been in this conversation for quite some time.
 
Are you by chance suffering from severe short term memory loss?

These are EMPIRICAL DATA that in post #1120 you just claimed climate scientists were ignoring. Should we call that a lie or simply an ignorant mistake? I'm leaning towards "lie". I mean, you've been in this conversation for quite some time.
No, my memory is fine. The geologic record is littered with examples of warming and cooling trends that were not caused by orbital or CO2 forcing. Why do you deny this?
 
No, my memory is fine. The geologic record is littered with examples of warming and cooling trends that were not caused by orbital or CO2 forcing. Why do you deny this?
Why are you trying to skip past your wee faux pas?
Who are basing their beliefs on computer modeling while ignoring empirical climate data.

Those data prove this statement to be false. You lied. And now you try to just change the subject by once again LYING about what I have and have not said.
 
Why are you trying to skip past your wee faux pas?


Those data prove this statement to be false. You lied. And now you try to just change the subject by once again LYING about what I have and have not said.
Incorrect, Don Quixote. Are you going to report me for spamming again?
 
😂😂😂

November 13, 2020 • METRO Staff

Jackson, Wyoming’s Southern Teton Area Rapid Transit (START) and Proterra have unveiled the first battery-electric buses in the state. The buses are also the first of the Proterra ZX5 buses to be deployed in the U.S.


Introduced in September, the 40-foot Proterra ZX5 MAX has 660 kWh of onboard energy, in addition to its DuoPower drivetrain, and can deliver up to 329 miles of drive range. By combining the DuoPower drivetrain with Proterra’s battery technology, the ZX5 provides superior performance designed to tackle Jackson’s routes even during the coldest winters. The DuoPower can also propel a bus up a 25 percent grade, making it an ideal option for routes with steep hills.

START Bus is planning to put its eight new ZX5 buses into service in late November. The agency hosted Proterra representatives for a small ribbon-cutting ceremony on Nov. 12, but due to COVID-19, it was not a public event. The public, however, will be able to join a webinar hosted by Yellowstone-Teton Clean Cities with Proterra representatives on Nov. 19, as they share specifics about the e-bus deployment in Teton County and the premiere of a video about the project.

Didn't even last 3 years.
 
From Undeniable, by Douglas Axe:

"… science boasts intellectual openness as its core virtue.

… But when openness gives way to dogma… we’re left with something more like bad religion than good science.

… official denouncement of any idea that poses a threat to the dogma… (is a telltale sign).
The real problem for science, however, is not people having agendas (as they always do) but rather the institutionalization of agendas.}"
__________________________

Darwinism has long been institutionalized, and now so too is "climate change."
Billions of dollars in government grants go to professional liars in white coats.
Join with them or you are ostracized, blackballed, and smeared.
 
"… science boasts intellectual openness as its core virtue.
And people like ChemEngineer want to violently censor anyone who disagrees with their dogma. See, for example, the state of Florida, where saying the wrong thing can literally get a teacher or librarian or scientist jailed. Needless to say, all Republicans adore those violent censorship policies.

ChemEngineer and his pals represent the Dark Age forces of superstition and ignorance. They are antiscience barbarians, warring on the forces of liberal enlightenment.
 
And people like ChemEngineer want to violently censor anyone who disagrees with their dogma. See, for example, the state of Florida, where saying the wrong thing can literally get a teacher or librarian or scientist jailed. Needless to say, all Republicans adore those violent censorship policies.

ChemEngineer and his pals represent the Dark Age forces of superstition and ignorance. They are antiscience barbarians, warring on the forces of liberal enlightenment.

ChemEngineer is an alchemist ... never heard of the Modern Synthesis ... doesn't understand the Bohr model of the atom. let alone the 20th Century notion of orbitals ...

If the stork hasn't been drinking whiskey, she usually brings couples the right baby, one that resembles the parents ... thus we have inherited traits ... usually ... mistakes happen, ask the Virgin Mary, baby Jesus was the spitting image of Joseph, haha, God can be quite the prankster when He wants to be ...
 
And people like ChemEngineer want to violently censor anyone who disagrees with their dogma. See, for example, the state of Florida, where saying the wrong thing can literally get a teacher or librarian or scientist jailed. Needless to say, all Republicans adore those violent censorship policies.

ChemEngineer and his pals represent the Dark Age forces of superstition and ignorance. They are antiscience barbarians, warring on the forces of liberal enlightenment.
So you’re saying, if he disagrees with your narrative, he’s censoring you? Hahaha hahaha

So you’re actually censoring him!!
 
The data is overwhelming. The history is indisputable. The lies have all been captured.

A study in the journal Nature Climate Change reviewed 117 climate predictions and found that 97.4% never materialized.
  • Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
  • In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
  • In January 2006 Al Gore predicted that we had ten years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.” We made it.
  • In 2008, a segment aired on ABC News predicted that NYC would be under water by June 2015.
  • In 1970, ecologist Kenneth E.F. Wattpredicted that “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but 11 degrees colder by the year 2000, This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.”
  • In 2008, Al Gore predicted that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap would be completely melted within 5-7 years. He at least hedged that prediction by giving himself “75%” certainty. By 2014 - the polar ice cap had expanded over 60% (more than 900,000 sq miles)
  • On May 13th 2014 France’s foreign minister said that we only have 500 days to stop “climate chaos.” The recent Paris climate summit met 565 days after his remark.
  • In 2009, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center head James Wassen warned that Obama only had four years left to save the earth.
  • On the first Earth Day its sponsor warned that “in 25 years, somewhere between 75% and 80% of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
  • And another Earth Day prediction from Kenneth Watt: “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
Top 10 Climate Change Predictions Gone Spectacularly Wrong; This Is EPIC!
Here we are six years later, and conservatives are still lying about the fact of human-caused climate change.

The right’s war on facts and the truth continues.
 

Forum List

Back
Top