The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[mamooth]

Snowflake...70% of the Earth's surface is covered in water. We have an overabundance

You are aware salt water is not useful, right? Given your displayed intellect, I have to ask.

So, tell us how to desalinate water without a massive energy input. And then explain why your method isn't being used _now_. See, I'm a liberal, so I demand practicality. Your pie-in-the-sky snowflake fantasies may impress your fellow cultists, but rational people want solutions that work.

we can grow anything in deserts now in a multitude of different ways, including indoors).

So, you're planning a hundred-fold increase in food production by growing food in deserts.

Neglecting things like the need for nitrogen and phosphorous, it's coming down to water again. Fascinating, how the current agriculture industry knows nothing about your amazing technology to turn immense quantities of ocean water into fresh water at nearly no energy cost. Is a secret global socialist conspiracy hiding it from them?

 

[P@triot]

Just as the science predicted.

Science predicted no such thing, mammaries. Progressive political activists masquerading as "scientists" predicted it. And their record is absolutely abysmal. Science says that anyone who is wrong 97.4% of the time is absolutely unreliable and should not be taken seriously.

Top 10 Climate Change Predictions Gone Spectacularly Wrong; This Is EPIC!

 

[P@triot]

Snowflake...70% of the Earth's surface is covered in water. We have an overabundance

You are aware salt water is not useful, right?

Ahahahahahahahaha! You walked right into it just like I predicted! You're literally so stupid, you have no idea that we've been able to desalinate ocean water since the 1970's (maybe even earlier?).

 

[mamooth]

Science predicted no such thing, mammaries.

Sure it did. You're just lying about it.

Your link, for example, show zero predictions by climate scientists. You lied about what your link said, so why shouldn't everyone assume everything you post is a lie?

Answer: They do assume that.

 

[mamooth]

Ahahahahahahahaha! You walked right into it just like I predicted!

It's hilarious, the way that you're too far stupid to ever understand how stupid you are. You're the poster boy for Dunning-Kruger Syndrome.

You're literally so stupid, you have no idea that we've been able to desalinate ocean water since the 1970's (maybe even earlier?).

Snowflake, I've run distilling units on ships, so I am very aware of how they work. I asked you how to desalinate _with little energy_. English, learn it.

What technology will allow us to desalinate immense quantities of ocean water without immense energy input?

And why aren't we using that technology now?

 

[Billy_Bob]

I don't buy into their pseudo science because...

... because your political/religious cult has filled your head with pseudoscience nonsense, leaving you totally ignorant of the actual science.

The inability to represent the earth's climate with a single temperature.

By that standard, we're unable to represent temp in your backyard with a single temperature. That is, your standard is dumb. Estimates and averages are useful.

The inability to accurately estimate a single temperature for the planet for each of the last 2000 years.

The science says otherwise. What did your cult tell you?

The misuse of the greenhouse gas effect to arrive at the erroneous conclusion that atmospheric CO2 drives climate change.

More unsupported cult propaganda, contradicted by reality.

The inability to show how CO2 has effected previous climates throughout the geologic record.

Again, that's the direct opposite of reality. It is not possible to explain previous climates without accounting for CO2.

The overestimation of feedback in their climate models.

As the models have been very accurate, that's more cult babbling on your part.

Blaming global warming for natural events such as heat waves, droughts, blizzards, floods, hurricanes and forest fires.

It's accurate to point out that global warming increases such events. If accurate science triggers you, that's your problem.

The overestimation of temperature and sea level in their models.

Again, as both have been very accurate, that's crazy talk.

The overestimation of the impact on life and property of climate change.

That's been very accurate too. Almost all of the economists and insurance companies agree with us.

The overdramatization of climate change.

Some random person's emotional response has nothing to do with how good the science has been. Your science is bad because the data says your science is bad, not because of your emotionalism.

The demonization of anyone who dares to challenge the science and findings of climate change.

The Flat Earthers make that complaint as well. By your standards, the fact that we call Flat Earthers dumbasses shows how Flat Earthers are correct.

You still trying to sell snow shovels?

They don't work well spreadin bull shit...

 

[P@triot]

Snowflake, I've run distilling units on ships, so I am very aware of how they work. I asked you how to desalinate _with little energy_. English, learn it.

Uh...no you didn't. You said no such thing, snowflake. Here is what you said word-for-word:

You are aware salt water is not useful, right?

And energy is not an issue. Never has been, never will be. Nuclear power creates unimaginable power for very little cost.

Any other idiotic things you'd like to say?

 

[P@triot]

So, you're planning a hundred-fold increase in food production by growing food in deserts.

We're even growing food underwater now...



As a progressive, you're too lazy and ignorant to keep up with technology. You simply immerse yourself in the approved narrative of the ideology and you leave it at that. How embarrassing for you...

 

[P@triot]

See, I'm a liberal, so I demand...

Please allow me to finish that sentence for you so that it is accurate (for once):

...that everyone ignore reality, facts, reason, and logic and bow to my bat-shit crazy left-wing ideology!

 

[P@triot]

It's so sad that mammaries buys into the idiotic progressive narrative of "the Earth cannot sustain our current population". The left has always engaged in deplorable acts of population control - from the eugenics of Margaret Sanger to the "final solution" of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's, to their latest insanity of "the Earth can't handle the population and it's about to explode from emissions".

The best part though? You never see a progressive commit suicide to reduce the population and "save" the planet. They always want everyone else to die. Gee...I wonder why that is.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The odd part is they can be told in no uncertain terms that they have been lied to, just like the media admitted to lying, and they will march blindly on and believe exactly what they have been told. Look how many still quote CNN. It seems they can't be lied to enough.
Nothing can make them believe the truth. It's kind of eerie..

OP is quoting the blaze and breitbart. Partisan publications known for propaganda and lies. The odd part is people believe the propaganda without question. It's kind of eerie...

Soooooooo........are you going to refute it or not?

 

[mamooth]

Uh...no you didn't. You said no such thing, snowflake. Here is what you said word-for-word:

Here's what I said, word-for-word you lying piece of shit. It's right up there. Why did you lie by pretending I didn't say it?

"So, tell us how to desalinate water without a massive energy input."

Given that you're going to lie outright about whatever I say, what's the point in speaking with you? After all, it's a given that you will always lie in response to anything anyone says to you. It's what defines you, the way you lie more readily than normal humans breathe.

So, why are you such a squealing pajama boy? Why can't you man up and discuss what people actually say? Were you castrated at birth, or was it done when you joined the cult?

And energy is not an issue. Never has been, never will be. Nuclear power creates unimaginable power for very little cost.

Very little cost?

You're just totally detached from reality. Have you noticed that nobody is building nuclear plants precisely because they're so incredibly expensive?

Enjoy your snowflake reality, dumbass. Out here in the real world, everyone is laughing at you.

 

[mamooth]

It's so sad that mammaries buys into the idiotic progressive narrative of "the Earth cannot sustain our current population".

I never said or implied any such thing. I only said you have to be a total retard to think the ear4th can easily support 7000 billion people. You really are the most dishonest pajama-boy on the board.

The left has always engaged in deplorable acts of population control - from the eugenics of Margaret Sanger

Back to your Stalinist lies about Sanger, eh?

Why don't you post the faked Sanger quotes again, little Stalinist fraud? We've been over it before. You know they're faked, but you'll still post them. Your Stalinist cult says that all cultists are required lie for the cult, and you always obey the cult.

 

[mamooth]

Soooooooo........are you going to refute it or not?

Nobody is ever obligated to refute a link to an avalanche o' crap, as that would require spending hours going through the crap point by point. That's why only the most dishonest and craven people use the avalanche o' crap tactic.

Instead, why don't _you_ personally single out what you think is the best argument? Then we can discuss it.

If you've got the guts, that is. Are you willing to back up your crap or not?

 

[IanC]

I don't buy into their pseudo science because...

The inability to represent the earth's climate with a single temperature.
The inability to accurately estimate a single temperature for the planet for each of the last 2000 years.
The misuse of the greenhouse gas effect to arrive at the erroneous conclusion that atmospheric CO2 drives climate change.
The inability to show how CO2 has effected previous climates throughout the geologic record.
The overestimation of feedback in their climate models.
Blaming global warming for natural events such as heat waves, droughts, blizzards, floods, hurricanes and forest fires.
The overestimation of temperature and sea level in their models.
The overestimation of the impact on life and property of climate change.
The overdramatization of climate change.
The demonization of anyone who dares to challenge the science and findings of climate change.

That is a really strong and we'll written comment.

Why didn't you tell us who wrote it?

 

[P@triot]

Soooooooo........are you going to refute it or not?

Nobody is ever obligated to refute a link...

Spoken like a true drooling progressive dimwit who can’t accept reality...

 

[P@triot]

Have you noticed that nobody is building nuclear plants...?

Yes...for two reasons

1. We built enough in the 1980’s that we don’t need anymore right now

2. Drooling dimwits such as yourself have bought into the “green” energy idiocy

 

[P@triot]

Instead, why don't _you_ personally single out what you think is the best argument? Then we can discuss it.

In other words...mammaries here is too lazy and too illiterate to actually read anything. She’s hoping that BTM will mention something specific from the links to save her from having to make any effort.

 

[Old Rocks]

Snowflake...70% of the Earth's surface is covered in water. We have an overabundance

You are aware salt water is not useful, right?

Ahahahahahahahaha! You walked right into it just like I predicted! You're literally so stupid, you have no idea that we've been able to desalinate ocean water since the 1970's (maybe even earlier?).

You are one fucking stupid ass. There is no economical way to desalinize water for the amount needed for irrigation. Even for drinking water for a city, it is very expensive.

 

[Old Rocks]

The inability to show how CO2 has effected previous climates throughout the geologic record.

LOL Dingleberry, you are one silly ass. It has been well proven that CO2 is second only to the sun as the determinate of climate.