The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[mamooth]

In other words...mammaries here is too lazy and too illiterate to actually read anything. She’s hoping that BTM will mention something specific from the links to save her from having to make any effort.

We understand, cult boi. You didn't even read your own links. You saw the propaganda in the title, posted the link, and that's it. That's why you run squealing when anyone tries to discuss them.

Again, chickenshit, we're happy to discuss anything in your links. Just bring it up specifically. We won't, however, spend hours refuting every single sentence in a long screed of fraudulent cult propaganda that you link to, especially since it's a given that a coward like you will respond by screaming "Fake news!", running away, and then posting the exact same debunked link somewhere else.

Now, are you going to put your big boy pants on and discuss a point, or will you keep running?

 

[mamooth]

Yes...for two reasons

1. We built enough in the 1980’s that we don’t need anymore right now

2. Drooling dimwits such as yourself have bought into the “green” energy idiocy

Your kook conspiracy theory violates the practice of capitalism. That is, people will chase profit. If nuclear power is so profitable, then they'd invest in it, instead of investing in fossile fuel or renewable energy.

Yet nobody is doing that.

So, is it your contention that the entire planet has turned socialist, and nobody cares about profit any more, and that's why they're not building that supposedly cheap nuclear power?

That is, just how far down the conspiracy kook rabbit hole have you gone?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Soooooooo........are you going to refute it or not?

Nobody is ever obligated to refute a link to an avalanche o' crap, as that would require spending hours going through the crap point by point. That's why only the most dishonest and craven people use the avalanche o' crap tactic.

Instead, why don't _you_ personally single out what you think is the best argument? Then we can discuss it.

If you've got the guts, that is. Are you willing to back up your crap or not?

Have you lrefuted anything at all in the list?

Instead, why don't _you_ personally single out what you think is the best argument? Then we can discuss it.

In other words...mammaries here is too lazy and too illiterate to actually read anything. She’s hoping that BTM will mention something specific from the links to save her from having to make any effort.

Yep, you are spot on. She is either lazy, scared, stupid, or most likely a conglomeration of all three. One hell of a way to go thru life.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Yes...for two reasons

1. We built enough in the 1980’s that we don’t need anymore right now

2. Drooling dimwits such as yourself have bought into the “green” energy idiocy

Your kook conspiracy theory violates the practice of capitalism. That is, people will chase profit. If nuclear power is so profitable, then they'd invest in it, instead of investing in fossile fuel or renewable energy.

Yet nobody is doing that.

So, is it your contention that the entire planet has turned socialist, and nobody cares about profit any more, and that's why they're not building that supposedly cheap nuclear power?

That is, just how far down the conspiracy kook rabbit hole have you gone?

The reason nobody is building nuclear power plants is because the cost and time to build one is extraordinary, mostly because of the permitting process. It is a well known fact that nuclear power plants are among the most productive.
The Ten Biggest Power Plants In America -- Not What You Think
Since nuclear’s cf is so high, it is likely that the most productive plants in America will be nuclear, which is exactly the case. In 2014, the following ten power plants produced the most electricity in America:

Palo Verde Nuclear Station 32,846,202,000 kWhs

Browns Ferry Nuclear Station 26,738,300,000 kWhs

Oconee Nuclear Generating Station 21,193,381,000 kWhs

South Texas Project Nuclear Station 20,651,667,000 kWhs

Grand Coulee Hydroelectric Station 20,266,322,000 kWhs

Braidwood Nuclear Station 20,263,665,000 kWhs

West County Energy Center (NGCC) 19,764,922,000 kWhs

Byron Nuclear Generating Station 19,252,381,000 kWhs

Limerick Nuclear Generating Station 19,077,244,000 kWhs

Scherer Coal-fired Power Plant 18,894,546,000 kWhs

 

[Old Rocks]

Yep. Lot's of electricity, at a high price. Capitalism and market economics like low prices for the same products.


Power Plant Type Cost
$/kW-hr
Coal $0.11-0.12
Natural Gas $0.053-0.11
Nuclear $0.096
Wind $0.044-0.20
Solar PV $0.058
Solar Thermal $0.184
Geothermal $0.05
Biomass $0.098
Hydro $0.064
Adapted from US DOE

Renewable Energy Sources: Cost Comparison

And if something goes wrong with one of the nukes, you have a generations long cleanup process at extreme cost. Fukushima.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Yep. Lot's of electricity, at a high price. Capitalism and market economics like low prices for the same products.


Power Plant Type Cost
$/kW-hr
Coal $0.11-0.12
Natural Gas $0.053-0.11
Nuclear $0.096
Wind $0.044-0.20
Solar PV $0.058
Solar Thermal $0.184
Geothermal $0.05
Biomass $0.098
Hydro $0.064
Adapted from US DOE

Renewable Energy Sources: Cost Comparison

And if something goes wrong with one of the nukes, you have a generations long cleanup process at extreme cost. Fukushima.

Tell me, how big is the cheap solar array of panels on your roof? Surely you are using that cheap energy.

What you don’t seem to acknowledge is that power is a utility and not subject to the capitalistic free market.

 

[mamooth]

The reason nobody is building nuclear power plants is because the cost and time to build one is extraordinary, mostly because of the permitting process.

The extraordinary cost holds all around the world. "Permitting" doesn't add tens of billions.

It is a well known fact that nuclear power plants are among the most productive.

Which has nothing to do with new plants not being cost-effective.

 

[mamooth]

Have you lrefuted anything at all in the list?

I'm still waiting for you to pick something to talk about.

Yest you won't. Anything beyond saying "MY LINK ROOLZ!" seems to be beyond your capability.

Just like P@triot, you haven't even read the link you claim is so awesome.

And just like P@rtriot, you're fundamentally yellow.

 

[P@triot]

It continues to get worse and worse for the “Global Warming” crowd. Yet again, we see their political activists posing as “scientists” caught in a lie. Of course, progressives (like mammaries) won’t read the link but will deny it anyway.

But after the evidence had been adjusted by tidal records gatekeepers at the global databank Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) it suddenly showed a sharp and dramatic rise.

The whistle was blown by two Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier in a paper for Earth Systems and Environment.

Yep...actual scientists exposed the lie from the left-wing political activists. I wonder how long the left can deny reality before it just becomes too exhausting for them?

Tidalgate: Climate Alarmists Caught Faking Sea Level Rise

 

[P@triot]

Just like P@triot, you haven't even read the link you claim is so awesome.

How bizarre...you get caught not reading links (while I read all links thoroughly) and then you attempt to accuse me of your actions. Desperate, much?

 

[P@triot]

 

[P@triot]

Here is a PhD who holds 4 degrees from M.I.T.



(The funny thing is...Glenn Beck explained all of this more than 8 years ago)

 

[mamooth]

Here is a PhD who holds 4 degrees from M.I.T.

Look, it's Shiva Ayyadurai, the guy who claimed to have invented email in 1978, even though ARPANET was using email in 1971. And then he sued the people who pointed that out, forcing settlements from small-time defendents who couldn't afford the legal fight.

The lesson? Denialism attracts scammers, and the gullible fall for the scams.

 

[P@triot]

Here is a PhD who holds 4 degrees from M.I.T.

Look, it's Shiva Ayyadurai, the guy PhD who....

...holds FOUR degrees from MIT. The school that won’t even allow you to attend.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The assholes calling it a scam are the real scam. Pure idiocy...This truly is the age of making shit up and attacking real evidence based thought with it. Sad.

 

[P@triot]

The assholes calling it a scam are the real scam. Pure idiocy...This truly is the age of making shit up and attacking real evidence based thought with it. Sad.

Snowflake...this thread is filled with indispensable evidence proving it is a scam. The fact that your masters had to rebrand it from “Global Warming” to “Climate Change” because the climate had indisputably proven them wrong should have tipped you off. And it would have if you had any intellect at all.

 

[P@triot]

The assholes calling it a scam are the real scam. Pure idiocy...

Let’s see if we can dumb this down to your level, Matthew. We’ll make this all very simple “Yes” or “No”.

Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”

We’re we “starving to death” starting in the 1980’s until now? Yes or No?

 

[mamooth]

..holds FOUR degrees from MIT. The school that won’t even allow you to attend.

So you're saying holding 4 degrees makes it okay to be a fraud and extortionist. Glad we got that straight. But then, everyone already knew how corrupt you were.

Care to summarize the circles and arrows in your own words? Of course you won't. As usual, you have no idea what your own "source" even says. The cult fed you a headline, and you BELIEVED. Talking about actual facts would take honesty and gonads, and you have neither. All you can do is lisp out "BUT MY LINK!". That's just one reason why you're laughed at, your consistent chickenshit act.

 

[P@triot]

..holds FOUR degrees from MIT. The school that won’t even allow you to attend.

So you're saying holding 4 degrees makes it okay to be a fraud and extortionist.

No...what I’m saying is that you continue to lie while he holds the degrees to be more qualified about this topic. That’s why you need to lie about him.

Global Warming was a scam. Al Gore became a billionaire by duping the simple minded like you.

Everything that Barack Insane Obama and the Dumbocrats proposed would not have reduced pollution a single ounce but would have redistributed wealth. In a nutshell, every company had “x” amount of “carbon credits” to pollute with. If they exceeded that level of pollution, they could purchase the “carbon credits” of small businesses that would never need them. Ergo, pollution was never reduced under the proposal. It simply redistributed wealth - the entire goal of Obama.

And he knew that simpletons like you would never understand it.

 

[mamooth]

No...what I’m saying is that you continue to lie

Yet you can't point to a lie. You're doing what all my obsessed stalkers do, which is pout "liar!" when they need to run from what I say. Boring.

while he holds the degrees to be more qualified about this topic.

No, I'm more qualified than he is, being how much I've studied the actual science involved. Actual science, as in the research and the actual physics behind it, as opposed to conspiracy blogs. He has no qualifications on the topic, being none of his degrees are related to it, and being that the ability to parrot conspiracy theories and make circles and arrows on a whiteboard is not a qualification. However, snowflakes like you crave authority figures to obey, so his kind of Appeal to False Authority fallacy always fools you

Now, I asked you to summarize his points. You're crying instead. That proves my point, that you don't even understand what he said, and you didn't even watch the video. As is usual, you have no idea what your own link said. You just saw the headline and BELIEVED.

Global Warming was a scam. Al Gore became a billionaire by duping the simple minded like you.

Gore Rule Invoked.

As Gore is a politician and not a scientist, he's not relevant to the science, and any mewling beta who brings up Gore automatically forfeits the thread.

Better luck next time, cult boi.