The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[Crick]

God are you stupid.

The planet is getting warmer. The definitive cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions.

Anyone who tells you the planet is NOT getting warmer is either really, really stupid or they are lying. Anyone who tells you that the warming is not due to the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions is either really, really stupid or they are lying.

 

[P@triot]

God are you stupid.

You bought into the "Global Warming" scam, you did so despite admitting that nobody knows (your words), you're on record multiple times claiming that many leftists lied to you about "Global Warming" (yet you still believe it), and you want to claim other people are "stupid"? Seriously? Bwahahahahahaha!

 

[P@triot]

The planet is getting warmer.

So much so that the polar ice cap expanded an astounding 60% (over 900,000 sq miles) in 2014. While the people who easily duped you were screaming the earth was "getting warmer", it was actually in a natural cooling period (indisputable NASA fact). As part of a natural, predictable cycle, it is now warming slightly coming off that slight cooling cycle.

You were duped. But your ego won't allow you to admit it. So you fight a fight that cannot be won (because you're on the wrong side of the facts).

 

[Crick]

Your claim is specious. When you made it a few posts back I posted the data showing it to be incorrect. As we've all heard, you've a right to your own opinion. You've no right to your own facts.

 

[P@triot]

As we've all heard, you've a right to your own opinion. You've no right to your own facts.

That’s why I’ve filled this thread with actual facts. Unfortunately, you think if you deny a fact, you can cease to make it a fact. Doesn’t work that way.

 

[baileyn45]

God are you stupid.

The planet is getting warmer. The definitive cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions.

Anyone who tells you the planet is NOT getting warmer is either really, really stupid or they are lying. Anyone who tells you that the warming is not due to the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions is either really, really stupid or they are lying.

No one argues that human GHGs don't have an effect. Anyone that says that GHGs are the primary driver of climate change are talking out of their ass. There is nothing to back that up, nothing. You are speaking of a science that is in its infancy. We knew as much about cancer 80 years ago as we know about the drivers of climate today. Anyone that tells you different is talking out of their ass. Quit saying you KNOW things that no one knows. Such attitudes are an affront to science.

 

[Crick]

These data back me up

This presentation or something very much like it has been in every one of the five assessment reports prepared by the IPCC. And in every one of them, the DATA show greenhouse warming from CO2 to be the largest single radiative forcing factor.

 

[P@triot]

These data back me up

It’s already been proven that the “data” is falsified.

Tidalgate: Climate Alarmists Caught Faking Sea Level Rise

‘Bombshell’ climate-change study could totally dismantle the claim humans are causing global warming

 

[P@triot]

These data back me up

The data shows you’ve been duped.

Study: Earth cooler now than when Al Gore won Nobel Peace Prize for global warming work

 

[P@triot]

These data back me up

The data shows you’ve been duped.

Scientists Observe Coldest Temperatures Ever on Earth’s Surface | Breitbart

 

[SSDD]

God are you stupid.

The planet is getting warmer. The definitive cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions.

Got any actual observed, measured evidence to support that claim? Got any observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability? Do you believe that if you make the claim forcefully enough that you don't need to provide actual evidence to support it?

Got any idea what the ideal temperature is for life on planet earth? You think ice age temperatures such as we are having now are better for life than a warmer climate? Any evidence to back up your belief?

 

[SSDD]

These data back me up

This presentation or something very much like it has been in every one of the five assessment reports prepared by the IPCC. And in every one of them, the DATA show greenhouse warming from CO2 to be the largest single radiative forcing factor.

Those aren't real data and there is no actual observed, measured evidence to support them...they are the output of failed climate models...There has never been a paper published in which the hypothetical warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and blamed on so called greenhouse gasses....it is all models all the time with you guys...the problem is that the atmosphere is eminently observable....if you had anything, then you would be using observations instead of models...

 

[P@triot]

More evidence that “Global Warming” is a scam...

“I also fly and use AC,” the Green New Deal touting pol tweeted Saturday night. “Living in the world as it is isn’t an argument against working towards a better future.”

If she were actually working towards making a “better future” then she wouldn’t live in the world as it is. She would live in a tepee. She would walk wherever she wanted to go.

Ocasio-Cortez responds to carbon footprint exposé: I’m just ‘living in the world’

 

[Crick]

Did you see her questioning Michael Cohen? She didn't produce any excess CO2 while single-handedly initiating the end of the Trump presidency

 

[mamooth]

It’s already been proven that the “data” is falsified.

If all the data didn't say your and your cult were the masters of fraud and corruption, you wouldn't have to rely entirely on weepy conspiracy theories. But the data does say that, so such conspiracy lunacy is all you have. Sucks to be you, little conspiracy snowflake.

I'll now prove that you're the pseudoscience-loving cultist, while we're the rational people embracing the hard science.

What evidence could possibly falsify your beliefs?

We can and have provided lists of hard evidence that could falsify our beliefs. That's because our beliefs are real science, and real science can be falsified.

If your belief is science, you can list hard data that would falsify that belief.

If your beliefs are cult dogma, then literally nothing could falsify such sacred scripture in your mind, you won't be able name any things that could falsify it, and you'll now go into evade-and-insult mode.

Please proceed.

 

[SSDD]

We can and have provided lists of hard evidence that could falsify our beliefs. That's because our beliefs are real science, and real science can be falsified.

You supplied a list of cherry picked items...many of which were based on assumptions with no actual evidence to support the claim that they were actually relevant...you know what falsifies a hypothesis...predictive failure and both the greenhouse hypothesis, and the AGW hypothesis have littered the land scape with their failed predictions...

In real science, one predictive failure is enough to falsify a hypothesis and prompt work on a new hypothesis with better predictive power...in pseudoscience, a hypothesis can have all the predictive failures it likes so long as the politicians keep supporting it and the funding keeps coming in...

 

[Crick]

Your problem is that you need a failed prediction based on what is actually contained in AGW: The world is getting warmer and the primary cause is human GHG emissions. A prediction that Buffalo, New York won't see snow till late December or the like is not a make or break prediction for AGW.

You have been given a list of items that would actually falsify AGW. And you have claimed several of them to apply: your contention that CO2 cannot absorb IR or warm the atmosphere or whatever bullshit it is you've been spouting lately. Or that the cooler atmosphere cannot radiate towards the warmer surface. If any of these were actually true, AGW WOULD be falsified. Trouble is, they're only real in the fantasy land with which you troll the boards.

TROLL

If there was ANY validity to your claim that there is no greenhouse effect; that the world is warmed by the compression of its atmosphere, no one would be worrying about AGW. But there isn't, so they are.

 

[P@triot]

I wonder how long Crick will deny science? Even the people who invented “Global Warming” are starting to admit it was a scam...

Greenpeace Founder: Global Warming Hoax Pushed by Corrupt Scientists

 

[P@triot]

If your belief is science, you can list hard data that would falsify that belief.

This is what is known as a “Freudian Slip”. It’s when a person inadvertently says what they are actually thinking.

She wants people who actually accept science to provide “data” to debunk science.

 

[Crick]

No. He is stating that the practice of the scientific method allows that a hypothesis or theory in the natural sciences may not be proven true. It may only be supported or not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. It may, however, be falsified by experiment or observation that refutes any of its premises.

For instance, a theory that all swans are white is shown false by a single observation of a black swan.

If you'd like to look into the topic, look up a man named Karl Popper.