Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, snowflake, you haven’t. It’s painfully obvious. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.I haveWe do...and you should try reading it sometime!lol. We have a Second Amendment.The U.S. Constitution never guaranteed you security. It guaranteed you liberty. You are responsible for your own security (hence the 2nd Amendment). If you’re too lazy or too much of a pussy for that responsibility, then you need to find a new nation.we should not have security problems in our free States.
Buh-bye!
In that Case, you must be referring to natural and individual rights as recognized and secured in State Constitutions, and available via Due Process.No, snowflake, you haven’t. It’s painfully obvious. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.I haveWe do...and you should try reading it sometime!lol. We have a Second Amendment.The U.S. Constitution never guaranteed you security. It guaranteed you liberty. You are responsible for your own security (hence the 2nd Amendment). If you’re too lazy or too much of a pussy for that responsibility, then you need to find a new nation.we should not have security problems in our free States.
Buh-bye!
The PEOPLE. Not some “militia”. You lose, fascist. The American people are armed and will remained arm. Period.
All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
As recognized in the U.S. Constitution. All rights are individual rights and require nothing on the part of the U.S. citizen to be afforded them.In that Case, you must be referring to natural and individual rights as recognized and secured in State Constitutions, and available via Due Process.
All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
No, they are not. The terms are clearly plural, not individual. And, if the general welfare doesn't affect Individuals, then neither can anything else in our Constitution.As recognized in the U.S. Constitution. All rights are individual rights and require nothing on the part of the U.S. citizen to be afforded them.In that Case, you must be referring to natural and individual rights as recognized and secured in State Constitutions, and available via Due Process.
All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
Yes, they are, stupid. There is no such thing as “collective rights”. All rights are indisputably individual rights. In addition, the “General Welfare” doesn’t affect anyone’s (individual or collective) because it doesn’t exist. It is not an enumerated power.No, they are not. The terms are clearly plural, not individual. And, if the general welfare doesn't affect Individuals, then neither can anything else in our Constitution.As recognized in the U.S. Constitution. All rights are individual rights and require nothing on the part of the U.S. citizen to be afforded them.
only the right wing appeals to ignorance of the law, while alleging they are for the "gospel Truth" of any given Thing, even if it is not Sunday.Yes, they are, stupid. There is no such thing as “collective rights”. All rights are indisputably individual rights. In addition, the “General Welfare” doesn’t affect anyone’s (individual or collective) because it doesn’t exist. It is not an enumerated power.No, they are not. The terms are clearly plural, not individual. And, if the general welfare doesn't affect Individuals, then neither can anything else in our Constitution.As recognized in the U.S. Constitution. All rights are individual rights and require nothing on the part of the U.S. citizen to be afforded them.
By desperately trying to sound “smart”, you’re making yourself sound really dumb. There is no such thing as a “common power” nor is there a such thing as a “general power”. There are, however, the enumerated powers. To which the federal government is explicitly restricted. And the “general welfare” is not one of those powers.And, the general welfare must be a general power, not a common power.
if the general welfare is not a general power, then how can the common defense, be Any more general?By desperately trying to sound “smart”, you’re making yourself sound really dumb. There is no such thing as a “common power” nor is there a such thing as a “general power”. There are, however, the enumerated powers. To which the federal government is explicitly restricted. And the “general welfare” is not one of those powers.And, the general welfare must be a general power, not a common power.
If it were, that would mean the federal government has unlimited power (up to and including execution without due process). We’ve been over this. You ran from it like a coward because it proved you wrong. Now you’re trying to come back with the same failed claim.o
Civil rights are distinct from the concept of natural and individual rights. That is the point we are quibbling.Yeah...becuase there is more than one citizen...you dumb ass.We Are Quibbling. The Terms are Plural, not Individual
Holy shit - you actually believed that the (s) on the end of the terms means that rights are collective?!?
View attachment 186919
Not really. Rights are right. One can certainly break them down into specific subcategories for organizational purposes if they want, but at the end of the day, they are still rights. One does not differ from the other in terms of the ramifications.Civil rights are distinct from the concept of natural and individual rights. That is the point we are quibbling. Thanks.
By desperately trying to sound “smart”, you’re making yourself sound really dumb. There is no such thing as a “common power” nor is there a such thing as a “general power”. There are, however, the enumerated powers. To which the federal government is explicitly restricted. And the “general welfare” is not one of those powers.And, the general welfare must be a general power, not a common power.
If it were, that would mean the federal government has unlimited power (up to and including execution without due process). We’ve been over this. You ran from it like a coward because it proved you wrong. Now you’re trying to come back with the same failed claim.o
thank you for admitting, the common Defense is not the common Offense or general warfare.Uh...the “common defense” is not a “general power”. It is an enumerated power.if the general welfare is not a general power, then how can the common defense, be Any more general?