The Clarence Thomas Follies!

[Dot Com]

Kennedy will vote to allow the IM to remain in place.

Have you been following Kennedy's voting? What about Citizens United travesty?

Kennedy will vote to allow the IM to remain in place.

I don't suspect that he will considering some of the comments he's made about Obama's policies.

Agreed. He cannot be counted on although I'm not saying which way he would vote inre: The Affordable Care Act.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Kagan on SCOTUS was pay back for Obama not doing any homework at Harvard

 

[taichiliberal]

Here's a proper link to the story:

The "Judicial Insider Trading" of Justice Clarence Thomas and Wife "Ginni" | Truthout

 

[taichiliberal]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

Translation: Whitehall couldn't have read the article, because the original link was faulty...so like a good little neocon parrot, Whitehall just blathers on about something he knows absolutely nothing about.

Here's the article.....let's see if Whitehall has the brains or the guts to logically or factually fault it:

The "Judicial Insider Trading" of Justice Clarence Thomas and Wife "Ginni" | Truthout

 

[taichiliberal]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

Translation: another neocon numbskull who DID NOT read the article, and therefore cannot possibly formulate a logically or fact based opinion.

 

[taichiliberal]

Did "Common Cause" look at the tax returns of every judge and politician? I doubt it. "Common Cause" is another left wing tax exempt propaganda machine. The CEO is a former democrat congressman and the executive officer is none other than Clinton defender Bob Reich. They are left wing elitists who especially target independent successful Black people who stray from the democrat plantation.

And when all is said and done, is the information against Thomas and his wife false? To date, no proof to the contrary on that.

 

[taichiliberal]

Bad Link

Loony left has never forgiven Thomas for not kissing their asses. They will keep on making up stuff till they find something that sticks.

Amazing how you formulate an opinion WITHOUT being able to examine the article.

Here genius, read it and THEN try to logically or factually fault it:

The "Judicial Insider Trading" of Justice Clarence Thomas and Wife "Ginni" | Truthout

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is Racism behind this latest attack on Thomas?

 

[taichiliberal]

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

She wasn't just randomly chosen. She affiliated herself w/ the T Party who is, apparently, vehemently against the Affordable Care Act. He also didn't report 100's of 1000's of dollars from groups like Heritage. Conflict of interest.
Clarence Thomas' dangerous conceit - Los Angeles Times

Common Cause discovered that Thomas had failed to disclose a source of income for 13 years on required federal forms. Thomas stated that his wife, Virginia, had no income, when in truth she had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007. Thomas reported "none" in answering specific questions about "spousal non-investment income" on annual forms — answers expressly made "subject to civil and criminal sanctions."

what does this-

Common Cause discovered that Thomas had failed to disclose a source of income for 13 years on required federal forms. Thomas stated that his wife, Virginia, had no income, when in truth she had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007. Thomas reported "none" in answering specific questions about "spousal non-investment income" on annual forms — answers expressly made "subject to civil and criminal sanctions."

have to do with him and obamacare when it reaches the court?

This is just PART of Thomas' problem, genius. Here, READ the article and THEN discuss the issue

The "Judicial Insider Trading" of Justice Clarence Thomas and Wife "Ginni" | Truthout

 

[taichiliberal]

Once again, lets all just thank God he is a republican.

Because neocon parrots prefer Republicans politicians/judicial appointees that cheat on their taxes while they make themn pay theirs?

 

[Trajan]

Once again, lets all just thank God he is a republican.

Because neocon parrots prefer Republicans politicians/judicial appointees that cheat on their taxes while they make themn pay theirs?

huh huh.....and we don't hire tax cheats as the Secretary of the Treasury

 

[taichiliberal]

kagan should recuse herself, she won't.

Why Kagan?

snip-

As Judicial Watch details, a Jan. 8, 2010, e-mail from Neal Katyal, former deputy solicitor general (and current acting solicitor general) to Brian Hauck, senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, discussing organizing the defense of ObamaCare against the inevitable legal challenges, wrote: "Brian, Elena would definitely like OSG (Office of Solicitor General) to be involved in this set of issues ... we will bring in Elena as needed."

On March 21, 2010, the day ObamaCare passed the House of Representatives, Katyal urged Kagan to attend a health care litigation meeting that was evidently organized by the Obama White House. It is not credible to suggest Kagan did not attend or did not contribute. An e-mail chain on that date, entitled "Health care litigation meeting," refers to an "internal government meeting regarding the expected litigation." Kagan is both author and recipient in the chain.
mp3Listen to the Podcast
Subscribe through iTunes

After Kagan was nominated on May 10, 2010, for the Supreme Court vacancy left by the retiring John Paul Stevens , Katyal began spreading the cover story insisting that Kagan was "walled off" from such discussions, defying belief that the solicitor general would not be actively involved in the legal strategy to defend the centerpiece of the Obama administration's agenda.

This is after Katyal invited Kagan to administration meetings to discuss precisely that. Another email trail unearthed by Judicial Watch discusses everyone getting his or her story story straight about Kagan's sudden lack of involvement in ObamaCare's defense.

On May 17, 2010, for example, Tracy Schmaler, a Department of Justice spokesperson, wrote to Katyal asking if Kagan had been involved in ObamaCare defense strategy. Katyal responded that she had not been. He forwarded the exchange to Kagan, saying, "This is what I told Tracy about HealthCare."

Kagan's response speaks volumes about her involvement in ObamaCare's legal defense: "This needs to be coordinated. Tracy you should not say anything about this before talking to me." We are reminded of the adage that if you tell the truth you never have to get your story straight or be "coordinated."

"Any reasonable person would read these documents and come to the same conclusion," says Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Elena Kagan helped coordinate the Obama administration's defense of ObamaCare."

more at-

Justice Kagan's ObamaCare Conflict - Investors.com

National Review Online blogger Carrie Severino keeps pushing the argument that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan may need to recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of the health care reform law. However, after a series of posts suggesting that Kagan might have lied when she said she was not involved in strategizing over how to defend the health care law, Severino has acknowleged that she doesn't "see enough evidence to know whether Justice Kagan must recuse herself from considering the upcoming Obamacare challenges."



National Review Comes Up Empty In Campaign To Keep Kagan From Hearing Health Care Cases | Media Matters for America


House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan
By Ian Millhiser on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm


House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan | ThinkProgress


Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act
Daily Kos: Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

 

[taichiliberal]

I'd pay to see Clarence Thomas debate ANY Liberal Intellectual Elite on the Constitution from Rdean to Larry Tribe to Barack Hussein "Negative Right" Obama

Read the articles, Frankie...then tell us all how you are just fine with a tax cheating/conflicted interest chief justice.


National Review Online blogger Carrie Severino keeps pushing the argument that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan may need to recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of the health care reform law. However, after a series of posts suggesting that Kagan might have lied when she said she was not involved in strategizing over how to defend the health care law, Severino has acknowleged that she doesn't "see enough evidence to know whether Justice Kagan must recuse herself from considering the upcoming Obamacare challenges."



http://mediamatters.org/mobile/blog/201104110023

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan
By Ian Millhiser on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/06/30/258561/gop-thomas-kagan/

Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/...utm_campaign=Feed:+dailykos/index+(Daily+Kos)

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'd pay to see Clarence Thomas debate ANY Liberal Intellectual Elite on the Constitution from Rdean to Larry Tribe to Barack Hussein "Negative Right" Obama

Read the articles, Frankie...then tell us all how you are just fine with a tax cheating/conflicted interest chief justice.


National Review Online blogger Carrie Severino keeps pushing the argument that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan may need to recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of the health care reform law. However, after a series of posts suggesting that Kagan might have lied when she said she was not involved in strategizing over how to defend the health care law, Severino has acknowleged that she doesn't "see enough evidence to know whether Justice Kagan must recuse herself from considering the upcoming Obamacare challenges."



National Review Comes Up Empty In Campaign To Keep Kagan From Hearing Health Care Cases | Media Matters for America

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan
By Ian Millhiser on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan | ThinkProgress

Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

Daily Kos: Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

It's an odd oversight on Thomas's part.

 

[taichiliberal]

Once again, lets all just thank God he is a republican.

Because neocon parrots prefer Republicans politicians/judicial appointees that cheat on their taxes while they make themn pay theirs?

huh huh.....and we don't hire tax cheats as the Secretary of the Treasury

Well chuckles, you don't see me defending Obama appointing Geithner, do ya? In fact, if you ever got your head out of Karl Rove's ass you would have noticed the balk against Obama for hiring Geithner from the Progressives, Left and some Dems....which is one of the reasons why they sat on their hands in 2010 elections.

But, it seems neocon parrots like YOU have NO problem with tax cheating judiciary. Laugh that one off.

 

[taichiliberal]

I'd pay to see Clarence Thomas debate ANY Liberal Intellectual Elite on the Constitution from Rdean to Larry Tribe to Barack Hussein "Negative Right" Obama

Read the articles, Frankie...then tell us all how you are just fine with a tax cheating/conflicted interest chief justice.


National Review Online blogger Carrie Severino keeps pushing the argument that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan may need to recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of the health care reform law. However, after a series of posts suggesting that Kagan might have lied when she said she was not involved in strategizing over how to defend the health care law, Severino has acknowleged that she doesn't "see enough evidence to know whether Justice Kagan must recuse herself from considering the upcoming Obamacare challenges."



National Review Comes Up Empty In Campaign To Keep Kagan From Hearing Health Care Cases | Media Matters for America

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan
By Ian Millhiser on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan | ThinkProgress

Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

Daily Kos: Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

It's an odd oversight on Thomas's part.

THAT'S the best you can do, Frankie?!! Damn, that's lame even for YOU! C'mon Frankie, grow a pair and buck the neocon parrot mindset....DECADES of tax cheating coupled with questionable relationship regarding Citizen's United...DOCUMENTED. Jokers like you were ready to hang Obama on hearsay, bogus evidence and guilt by association, but Thomas is "an odd oversight"?!!?? Spare me, Frankie!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Read the articles, Frankie...then tell us all how you are just fine with a tax cheating/conflicted interest chief justice.


National Review Online blogger Carrie Severino keeps pushing the argument that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan may need to recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of the health care reform law. However, after a series of posts suggesting that Kagan might have lied when she said she was not involved in strategizing over how to defend the health care law, Severino has acknowleged that she doesn't "see enough evidence to know whether Justice Kagan must recuse herself from considering the upcoming Obamacare challenges."



National Review Comes Up Empty In Campaign To Keep Kagan From Hearing Health Care Cases | Media Matters for America

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan
By Ian Millhiser on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm

House GOP Ignores Thomas Ethics Scandal To Launch Frivolous Attack On Justice Kagan | ThinkProgress

Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

Daily Kos: Republicans push for investigation of Supreme Court Justice Kagan on Affordable Care Act

It's an odd oversight on Thomas's part.

THAT'S the best you can do, Frankie?!! Damn, that's lame even for YOU! C'mon Frankie, grow a pair and buck the neocon parrot mindset....DECADES of tax cheating coupled with questionable relationship regarding Citizen's United...DOCUMENTED. Jokers like you were ready to hang Obama on hearsay, bogus evidence and guilt by association, but Thomas is "an odd oversight"?!!?? Spare me, Frankie!

Yeah, that's all I got right now considering the sources reporting it.

 

[taichiliberal]

Most of those "racist segregationist" who were left in Washington went from Dixiecrats to Republicans.
Yeah, that Soros guy is an evil lefty. The guy is using his wealth to influence national and international policies by funding the Dems.
AND then there's the Koch brothers, doing the same thing,,,,but that's different. And to tie it into this thread, it doesn't matter that Clarence Thomas has become their tool and favorite pet. The Koch brothers have paid for trips for Thomas, arranged speaking events where Thomas was paid for his arranged speech by the Koch Brothers and the Koch brothers have had secret conferences with Thomas.
So, why deflect to Soros, when the right has their own Soros in the form of the Koch brothers.
Personally, I think there is something very, very wrong with politicans or judges being attached at the waist to an ideologue who is trying to influence national policy and laws by buying that influence. So therefore, I hate the influence the Soros's and Koch's of the world, have on those who make laws and those who uphold these laws as Constitutional.

“I'll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years”

Point taken.
But I didn't say all Dixiecrats went to the GOP, I said "most"!

Frankie forgets about Nixon's "Southern Strategy"....or most likely he just ignores what doesn't fit his neocon mantras and ideology.

 

[taichiliberal]

Is Racism behind this latest attack on Thomas?

Who told you that, Frankie? Levin? Hannity? Limbaugh? Maulkin? O'Riley? Crowley? Beck? Savage? The WND? The Washington Times? Fox Noise? What's your proof, or are you issuing your usual mind flatulence, Frankie?

 

[taichiliberal]

It's an odd oversight on Thomas's part.

THAT'S the best you can do, Frankie?!! Damn, that's lame even for YOU! C'mon Frankie, grow a pair and buck the neocon parrot mindset....DECADES of tax cheating coupled with questionable relationship regarding Citizen's United...DOCUMENTED. Jokers like you were ready to hang Obama on hearsay, bogus evidence and guilt by association, but Thomas is "an odd oversight"?!!?? Spare me, Frankie!

Yeah, that's all I got right now considering the sources reporting it.

This means that Frankie Boy CANNOT refute, disprove or deny the evidence presented in the links I presented folks.....assuming he actually READ any of the articles all the way through.