At some point in history it is typical for all scientists to believe one thing based on their current view of whatever they are looking at.
An example would be how most scientists used to believe the earth was flat. There were a few who argued otherwise but they were summarily dismissed at the time.
Scientists used to believe the Earth was the center of our solar system. Those who didn't and said so publicly were even locked away or worse for their treachery.
Point being that reasonable minds are often wrong and equally reasonable minds with opposing opinions can also be right.
Below is a video of an incredibly intelligent person who is in fact a scientist and he picks apart equally intelligent positions from opposing thoughts of view.
While the main focus of the video/debate is the Younger Dryass impact hypothesis it also touches on GLOBULL WARMING. Many scientists refuse to accept the Younger Dryass impact as a fact of history or even a possibility because it would invalidate part of their global warming dogma.
An example would be how most scientists used to believe the earth was flat. There were a few who argued otherwise but they were summarily dismissed at the time.
Scientists used to believe the Earth was the center of our solar system. Those who didn't and said so publicly were even locked away or worse for their treachery.
Point being that reasonable minds are often wrong and equally reasonable minds with opposing opinions can also be right.
Below is a video of an incredibly intelligent person who is in fact a scientist and he picks apart equally intelligent positions from opposing thoughts of view.
While the main focus of the video/debate is the Younger Dryass impact hypothesis it also touches on GLOBULL WARMING. Many scientists refuse to accept the Younger Dryass impact as a fact of history or even a possibility because it would invalidate part of their global warming dogma.
