- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #21
I don't want to put words in anybody's mouth, but I'm pretty sure he is talking about archeological evidence in North and South America of the types of civilizations described in the Book of Mormon. As for Nahom/Bountiful, that is shaky evidence of it at best.
Shaky at best? The fact that the Book of Mormon describes a route through Arabia that fits the description in the book is Shaky? How would Joseph have known about a place called Nahom? Or that directly east of there is a location that fits all the requirements for Bountiful?
Ultimately it doesn't matter. Archaelogy is not what will show people the truth. The Spirit will. but to claim there is no archaelogical evidence is just blatantly false.