Common sense would say criminals shouldn't have arms.A "condition" debunked many times on this forum. Apparently little rightwinger thinks enough time has gone by that he can try to fool people into thinking it's true again.It does say....A well regulated militia being necessary for a free state
How do you view our gun policy and second amendment? | Page 4 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
I know, I know
If the founders had wanted to make gun rights absolute they could have written it as such
The right to bear arms shall not be infringed PERIOD
They did not
The right to bear arms shall not be infringed
in·fringe
[inˈfrinj]
VERB
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on:"his legal rights were being infringed" ·
restrict · limit · curb · check · encroach on.
Oxford Dictionary
So, taking guns away from criminals would be infringing. Why do pro-gun people support taking guns away from criminals?
The second amendment doesn't.
Our bill of rights allows criminals to have guns.
We need a convention to change the constitution to allow for the striping of a persons rights if they are a criminal, terrorist, or on US land illegally.