Texas Officials Illuminate Crosses After Atheists’ Call for Removal

[caddo kid]

One of the most bizarre creations of the Godless left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and in some cases, even requires the censorship and suppression of religious beliefs and symbols; in direct opposition to what the First Amendment actually says.

Just one more datum to demonstrate that LIbEralism is a mental disease.

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

We already do. That terrorist in Minnesota wears Muslim garb with the specific intent of reflecting her commitment to Islam while representing the people of her district to the US Congress.
You tell her to remove it while she’s on the clock.

"Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings?" was the question.

Now you look like the retard that you are.

 

[Lysistrata]

One of the most bizarre creations of the Godless left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and in some cases, even requires the censorship and suppression of religious beliefs and symbols; in direct opposition to what the First Amendment actually says.

Just one more datum to demonstrate that LIbEralism is a mental disease.

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

We already do. That terrorist in Minnesota wears Muslim garb with the specific intent of reflecting her commitment to Islam while representing the people of her district to the US Congress.
You tell her to remove it while she’s on the clock.

Members of Congress are government buildings, are they?

Yes. In their official representation.

As representatives they are government buildings.

So Mitch McConnell is a government building?

This thread is getting amusing. The right-wingers are arguing both for and against religious expression in government buildings, sometimes in the same paragraph.I take it that the Sargeant at Arms is supposed to collect all religious regalia before allowing a member of Congress to enter, hijabs go in one drawer, yarmulkes in another, the cross necklaces in another, along with the lapel pins. Sheesh.

This thread is about the appropriateness of a permanent installation of a sectarian religious symbol on a government building, not wearing apparel.

 

[Cellblock2429]

One of the most bizarre creations of the Godless left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and in some cases, even requires the censorship and suppression of religious beliefs and symbols; in direct opposition to what the First Amendment actually says.

Just one more datum to demonstrate that LIbEralism is a mental disease.

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

We already do. That terrorist in Minnesota wears Muslim garb with the specific intent of reflecting her commitment to Islam while representing the people of her district to the US Congress.
You tell her to remove it while she’s on the clock.

"Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings?" was the question.

Now you look like the retard that you are.

/—-/ The Muslim religion is not compatible to our Constitution.

 

[caddo kid]

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

We already do. That terrorist in Minnesota wears Muslim garb with the specific intent of reflecting her commitment to Islam while representing the people of her district to the US Congress.
You tell her to remove it while she’s on the clock.

Members of Congress are government buildings, are they?

Yes. In their official representation.

As representatives they are government buildings.

So Mitch McConnell is a government building?

This thread is getting amusing. The right-wingers are arguing both for and against religious expression in government buildings, sometimes in the same paragraph.I take it that the Sargeant at Arms is supposed to collect

Many of these people don't even bother to read
(1) anything about the OP content
(2) what they themselves type

Many of these people often make retards look like MENSA material ..............

 

[The Purge]

GOD BLESS TEXAS!!!!! It matters who we elect...Nice job Texas! More people should fight back - take a stand - like that

COLDSPRING, TX – Elected officials in an East Texas community defiantly illuminated the crosses on their courthouse after an atheist organization told them to take them down. The move came after the county judge and commissioners voted unanimously to keep the four crosses on the county building.

Breitbart News reported that the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) complained to San Jacinto County public officials about the prominent display of the “Latin cross[es].” The self-described “state/church watchdog” claims it has over 30,000 members.

The foundation issued an “Action Alert” to its supporters on May 7th saying, “A concerned Coldspring resident reported to FFRF that San Jacinto County has the crosses up all year round and even lights the crosses during the holiday season.” The organization that calls itself a “nonprophet nonprofit” asked members to “Tell San Jacinto commissioners to remove courthouse crosses.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

So....they are putting everyone on notice that unless you are a so-called christian, you cannot get a fair legal shake at their courts.

Only a demented leftist that wants to take away peoples RIGHTS to do what they are legally allowed to do think that...right ABNORMAL!

 

[MarcATL]

/—-/ It demands the Gubmint stay out of religion not that religion stay out of Gubmint

That's your interpretation.

That said.

Based on your interpretation, do you want Muslim practices, symbols conducted and/or seen on government buildings, properties, etc.?

 

[MarcATL]

Muslims had NOTHING to do with forming this country....Christian's and a few Jews did!.....and our STATE RELIGION is?.... Idiot!

The constitution stated nothing about groups not having anything to do w/forming this country.

It's about how the law is conducted IN this country.

You're the idiot, idiot.

 

[The Purge]

/—-/ It demands the Gubmint stay out of religion not that religion stay out of Gubmint

That's your interpretation.

That said.

Based on your interpretation, do you want Muslim practices, symbols conducted and/or seen on government buildings, properties, etc.?

And they had what to do with our culture, traditions and history except be pirates in the early 18th century robbing and killing....the same shit they do today!

 

[MarcATL]

/——/ nothing unconstitutional about it.

I know that's what you think, you and many other radicals like you.

That's the problem.

 

[The Purge]

Muslims had NOTHING to do with forming this country....Christian's and a few Jews did!.....and our STATE RELIGION is?.... Idiot!

The constitution stated nothing about groups not having anything to do w/forming this country.

It's about how the law is conducted IN this country.

You're the idiot, idiot.

The constitution says nothing about abortion and gay sex either....but ethics, morals, and principles are missing in YOUR THINKING...IDIOT!

 

[MarcATL]

And they had what to do with our culture, traditions and history except be pirates in the early 18th century robbing and killing....the same shit they do today!

What does that have to do w/anything?

 

[The Purge]

And they had what to do with our culture, traditions and history except be pirates in the early 18th century robbing and killing....the same shit they do today!

What does that have to do w/anything?

You brought it up with your Muslim bullshit...moron!

 

[MarcATL]

The constitution says nothing about abortion and gay sex either....but ethics, morals, and principles are missing in YOUR THINKING...IDIOT!

Does the constitution talk about modern technology? Does it talk about straight sex?

You truly are an A1 class idiot.

 

[The Purge]

The constitution says nothing about abortion and gay sex either....but ethics, morals, and principles are missing in YOUR THINKING...IDIOT!

Does the constitution talk about modern technology? Does it talk about straight sex?

You truly are an A1 class idiot.

Why would it...is your sex life that insecure with you? Dumbfuck.

 

[MarcATL]

You brought it up with your Muslim bullshit...moron!

Yes, because it's a religion, that's widely practiced in America, just like Christianity.

Which is what this thread is about.

But you're too dumb to understand this.

 

[MarcATL]

Why would it...is your sex life that insecure with you? Dumbfuck.

OK, I see I'm engaging a retarded child here.

Carry on dExt3r.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

One of the most bizarre creations of the Godless left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and in some cases, even requires the censorship and suppression of religious beliefs and symbols; in direct opposition to what the First Amendment actually says.

Just one more datum to demonstrate that LIbEralism is a mental disease.

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

Really?
Show me where it says that.

 

[The Purge]

You brought it up with your Muslim bullshit...moron!

Yes, because it's a religion, that's widely practiced in America, just like Christianity.

Which is what this thread is about.

But you're too dumb to understand this.

Yet it has NOTHING to do with our history and culture...but a dog like you wants it celebrated as an equal to our 2 major religions that played a huge part in our founding!

 

[Meister]

One of the most bizarre creations of the Godless left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and in some cases, even requires the censorship and suppression of religious beliefs and symbols; in direct opposition to what the First Amendment actually says.

Just one more datum to demonstrate that LIbEralism is a mental disease.

The Constitution states a SEPARATION of church and state.

Do you want to see Muslim symbols on government buildings as well dumb dumb?

Dear MarcATL
Govt can neither establish nor prohibit religion.

If people democratically agree to allow for expression,
as long as it is coming from the PEOPLE that's considered consent of the governed.

If it's dictated from the GOVERNMENT where it doesn't represent the people's consent,
then that's government establishing a religious bias.

Here, if the people of TEXAS complain, then the state should accommodate the people's authority.

People from a different state protesting what another state does,
that is like Hindus trying to tell Muslims what policies to practice.

The Federal Govt should remain neutral and allow PEOPLE to set up their own STATE policies.
They can't abuse govt to impose on other people of that state, but people within a state can
agree and decide on policies democratically.

At issue is the First Amendment was incorporated. This means that it protects the people or individual from the State.

Exactly

 

[The Purge]

Why would it...is your sex life that insecure with you? Dumbfuck.

OK, I see I'm engaging a retarded child here.

Carry on dExt3r.

Another ABNORMAL that cant handle the truth....go back to Africa and see if you can stop Muslim slavery of your people there instead of showing what a useless turd you are!

 

[MarcATL]

Not even religious in any sense, yet I find Atheists to generally be douches.

Funny, b/c I'm very religious, yet I find those on the Christian rights to be generally douches.