Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 17,198
- 10,447
- 1,138
Too late. Already blocked again. Random stops will have to wait.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They're already destroying that on numerous chat boards and social medias if you have the wrong opinionNo, first up, first amendment if the lib cult gets power b
"RaNdOm StOpS" cause swimming across the Rio Grande and jumping a border fence sure screams RaNdOm StOpToo late. Already blocked again. Random stops will have to wait.
So only line of support of the Rio Grande?"RaNdOm StOpS" cause swimming across the Rio Grande and jumping a border fence sure screams RaNdOm StOp
You're an absolute retard
So only line of support of the Rio Grande?
Answer the question. Only Line of Sight from the Rio Grande?
Now you know why we need the wall to stop them at the borderToo late. Already blocked again. Random stops will have to wait.
A moment of joy for the thought and fact judicial processI know....all the long winded, peer reviewed, self righteous dissertations spat out with intellectual snicker and condescencion on why the Ballot bans would stay.....all gone in one fel swoop. lol
Lol you're not my supervisor I don't have to answer shitAnswer the question. Only Line of Sight from the Rio Grande?
They are not implementing nor creating new law . They are enforcing what feckless won’tThe SC is wreaking havoc on its own established precedent. The TX law is unconstitutional just as AZ's was.
Arizona v. United States is a case decided on June 25, 2012, by the United States Supreme Court holding that states may not implement their own immigration laws. The case concerned Arizona's immigration-related law SB 1070, enacted in 2010. At issue was whether federal immigration law preempts state immigration law.
.We need to crank up production of razor wire, zip tie handcuffs and fuel up the deportation busses.
So you don't have a clue how not to violate the rights of US Citizens with this law. Got it.Lol you're not my supervisor I don't have to answer shit
Cry about it
This SCOTUS decision is pretty disgraceful. The Texas law clearly violates long established legal precedent.6-3. Arrest and deport.
For the meantime, Texas has a right to protect their border.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that it will allow Texas to enforce for now a contentious new law that gives local police the power to arrest migrants.
The conservative-majority court, with three liberal justices dissenting, rejected an emergency request by the Biden administration, which said states have no authority to legislate on immigration, an issue the federal government has sole authority over.
That means the law can go into effect while litigation continues in lower courts. It could still be blocked at a later date.
_____________________
The law in question, known as SB4, allows police to arrest migrants who illegally cross the border from Mexico and imposes criminal penalties. It would also empower state judges to order people to be deported to Mexico.
Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce immigration law
The Biden administration sued to block the law, saying it tramples on the federal government’s exclusive authority to oversee immigration issues.www.nbcnews.com
I believe SCOTUS just kicked it back. The appellate court has not blocked it pending arguments.This SCOTUS decision is pretty disgraceful. The Texas law clearly violates long established legal precedent.
Their use of an administrative stay is entirely inappropriate and a pretty transparent effort to allow the law to be in force without having to meet the requirements for a stay pending appeal.I believe SCOTUS just kicked it back. The appellate court has not blocked it pending arguments.
Due to president Biden, (the federal government) , not doing their job at the border. If that isn't an impeachable offense, I don't what is.Basically it’s conservative justices screwing with the system to achieve an outcome.
Evidently you don't know what is then.Due to president Biden, the federal government , not doing their job at the border. If that isn't an impeachable offense, I don't what is.
Evidently you don't know what is then.
Then you don't know what an impeachable offense is.Due to president Biden, (the federal government) , not doing their job at the border. If that isn't an impeachable offense, I don't what is.