Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
No, he is being prudent.Disbar him.
DOMA Windsor 2013 said that the fed cannot be the one to decide on any type of marriage. It merely has a function of recognizing those marriages made legal within the separate states.
Then BS 2015 said "oh no, wait a minute, now the fed has the power to tell states who they must marry because the fed just created a new "class" of protected people identified for the first time ever by waffling deviant sex practices". So doing, the fed acted as psychologist, anthropologist and sociologist supreme. And a few other things it self-imagines itself much more wise than the states to be. Excuse me, I mean just 5 people in the fed imagine themselves as uber-sociologists far more wise as to the ways of regulating behaviors than the states are.
So this judge is throwing down the gauntlet and calling those 5 out. He's saying "OK smarty pantses, tell me what my state should do next?" "When is a marriage not a marriage, because Tennessee used to decide that but now you're in the business of setting rules on human behaviors and how they affect marriage so???"
I love it. It's pure genius. Instead of being disbarred, he should win the Nobel Prize.