2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,970
- 52,237
- 2,290
This is a temporary win because the next level of Court already has one rabidly anti-gun asshole sitting on it......and if the democrats win the White House and Senate in 2024, they will likely be the party replacing Justices Thomas and Alito when they retire or die, handing the court back to the left and the spineless Justice Roberts....
It turns out that bullets are an essential part of a gun, and limiting the number of rounds in a gun violates the Oregon constitution. A county judge in Oregon made that decision on Tuesday overturning Measure 114, a citizen-passed measure that outlawed what gun grabbers call "high capacity magazines" and required that Oregon serfs get a permit to be allowed to purchase a gun.
---------
Raschio utterly annihilated testimony by the state's top expert, an epidemiologist from Tufts University who testified about what he thought was a connection between guns that hold more than ten rounds and mass shootings. The judge determined that Dr. Michael Seigel tailored his testimony to please state gun-grabbers and based it on "not scientifically useful conclusions."
"His testimony was based upon four academic studies of 179 events he considered mass shootings without any consideration of the many variables that could impact those conclusions," the judge said.
Raschio continued, "...there was not even an agreed-upon definition in those four studies for a definition of a mass shooting. If the science cannot agree on a definition, how can a court derive any conclusions from the data."
pjmedia.com
It turns out that bullets are an essential part of a gun, and limiting the number of rounds in a gun violates the Oregon constitution. A county judge in Oregon made that decision on Tuesday overturning Measure 114, a citizen-passed measure that outlawed what gun grabbers call "high capacity magazines" and required that Oregon serfs get a permit to be allowed to purchase a gun.
---------
Raschio utterly annihilated testimony by the state's top expert, an epidemiologist from Tufts University who testified about what he thought was a connection between guns that hold more than ten rounds and mass shootings. The judge determined that Dr. Michael Seigel tailored his testimony to please state gun-grabbers and based it on "not scientifically useful conclusions."
"His testimony was based upon four academic studies of 179 events he considered mass shootings without any consideration of the many variables that could impact those conclusions," the judge said.
Raschio continued, "...there was not even an agreed-upon definition in those four studies for a definition of a mass shooting. If the science cannot agree on a definition, how can a court derive any conclusions from the data."
Judge Obliterates Oregon's Newest Gun Grab
pjmedia.com
