Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #781
So, after more than 750 postings, not one person here can find the passage in the US Constitution or in the US Legal Code that proves that one of the reasons for the 2nd Amendment, as Ted Cruz lyingly said, is "ultimate check against tryanny", which of course means armed insurrection.
Lots of screaming and moaning and groaning, but not one cogent argument based on actual fact.
I have provided the exact text of the 2nd Amendment more than once. It's there for all to see.
So, can ANYONE find the passage in the US Constitution that allows for armed insurrection? That makes armed insurrection somehow a right?
How about Federal Law? Any luck there?
Otherwise, it is then clear that Ted Cruz is full of shit when he says that the 2nd Amendment is there as the "ultimate check against tyranny". In fact, there are laws on the books AGAINST armed insurrection.
If the founders found armed insurrection necessary, they could have included it in the constitution
Instead, they put in things like freedom of speech, free press, the vote.....What a bunch of fucking liberals
Give us an idea of how they put armed insurrection in the document so it makes sense rather than just telling people if their government became oppressive to oppose it
Let's see..
They could have arranged for militias with the sole purpose to have a force the equivalent of our federal forces. That would allow armed insurrection
Instead, they gave us a free press, freedom of speech and the vote
Truly wise men
Yepp.