Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #721
Wrong. What Cruz discussed was simply that the purposes for the 2d amendment involved a check on the prospect of tyranny. You might not like that fact, but a fact is what it was then and remains.
That has exactly NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the fact that a legitimate government ALSO has the power and authority to put down a rebellion.
Indeed, even if the Federal Government drastically transgressed the limitations imposed on it by the Constitution, and proceeded to behave tyrannically, we would EXPECT the government to resort to force to put down any insurrection. And that is exactly the point. They could do so with ease if they had the ability to disarm the people. They would be much harder pressed if the ARMED people fought back.
Only, they don't. The purpose that you listed: "a check on the prospect of tyranny" - is NOT enumerated in the US Constitution, it is NOT enumerated in Federal Law.
Which part of "Constitution" and "Federal Law" do you not understand, Ilar?
Or better yet, please show me the clause in the Constitution that backs up your claim.
We can wait. Have fun hunting for it.