Tea Party Is Recycled John Birch Society Hate Rhetoric

I hate communists. Don't you?

Depends on who you mean, Revere. People who support repressive dictatorships known for killing their own people? Of course?

Hippies deluded into thinking they can create a utopia? No, not really. Everyone is entitled to be an adolescent once...for a brief time.

Are you sure about that?

You know McCarthy outed Lauchlin Currie as a Communist spy and he and his buddies at over at State got the US to abandon Chaing Kai Shek for Mao.

Are you sure you don't support that?
 
Well..yeah.

It's pretty obvious that the Tea Party movement reflects the values of the Birchers.

how so....exactly?

The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?



:lol: I thought so...

pitiful. really.



Evidently its very hard for you. You don't even know the difference between a communist and a socialist ( European style which is what they refer to and intend) , and values vs. rhetoric.
 


CNBC is the liberal media, now I'll post the that liberal media to show you where the idea for the republican tea party comes from. Republican ideas came from a liberal news org....And the Sky is Magenta!!

Isnt it Ironic....Dont you th...well











CON2593-4.jpg

And that's the point. The more they smear, the more they sputter, the more they rage against this machine, the Tea Party just gets stronger.

They don't get it.

They don't have the intelligence, the insight, or the understanding of basic human nature to understand the Tea Party.

They don't have intelligence, they just have arrogance.

Make fun of them when they rage against you. Laugh at them. It will make them all the more infuriated they haven't intimidated you into silence.

And the more they get infuriated, the more they will reveal who they truly are for the rest of the world to see.

Liberals always did defeat themselves with their own elitist arrogance.

Let's all have a really good laugh at their expense on November 2.

Isn't this fun??? :D

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
If she "lived through it" and was old enough to be politically aware of it, she'd have to be in her 70s or 80s.

Hell, I'm almost in my 50s (I turn 49 next week) and I didn't live through the Bircher era.

She's either older than my mother or lying.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
how so....exactly?

The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?



:lol: I thought so...

pitiful. really.



Evidently its very hard for you. You don't even know the difference between a communist and a socialist ( European style which is what they refer to and intend) , and values vs. rhetoric.

Um..is this false?

Please feel free. Tear the assertion apart.

I know deflection is easier..but lets try to color within the lines. No?
 
If she "lived through it" and was old enough to be politically aware of it, she'd have to be in her 70s or 80s.

Hell, I'm almost in my 50s (I turn 49 next week) and I didn't live through the Bircher era.

She's either older than my mother or lying.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Sure you did. Or you either weren't in this country or you are lying about your age.

I turn 50 in next year. I sure as heck lived through the Birchers.
 
What Beck puts up are whacky, out of context "Facts" much like Fox news. And that's when he isn't plain lying.

He's admitted to being PT Barum. Why isn't anyone on the right listening?

Oh wait..

It's this way to see the famous Egress..

Everyone on the right is laughing. We think it's pretty funny how you all are so obsessed with Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, and Fox news. Something about voicing our constitutional right to free speech that makes you all continue day after day posting your whining and moaning about them. Mental illness in full bloom is sad but kinda funny to watch.

Laughter is not the same as actually doing something constructive. It's easy to criticize and much harder to build.

I agree. Palin and he husband built a successful business. Tell us how many businesses Obama has built?
 
I get the feeling Madelbrain either has me on ignore or is afraid to debate me.

If she is such a Weiner, er I mean Winner, why is she running away?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Her schtick is to flame and run.

Actually, it is SOP for TPS to whine that everyone she disagrees with is too 'scared' to 'debate' her.... In fact, it's that most of us are too busy laughing at her to bother.

Who's laughing at whom?

You got that quote of me saying something bigoted about muslims they haven't said about themselves.

Funny how those "who won't be bothered to debate" can sure come in and troll.

Yeah, you aren't scared to debate me. That's why you ran away and haven't debated me since, I asked that one question?

Got that quote of me saying something bigoted about muslims they haven't said about themselves yet?

Who's laughing? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
I dont understand how wanting to follow the Constitution and not spend ourselves into oblivion is hate.

That is not the point of the Op, Avatar. The Op is about the direct line between the Tea Party and Glenn Beck to the John Birch Society....a connection few tea party people likely know of or would welcome.
.

The Tea Party is a collection of Hundreds of separate groups. Not one big group that can be collectively tied to anyone.
 
The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?



:lol: I thought so...

pitiful. really.



Evidently its very hard for you. You don't even know the difference between a communist and a socialist ( European style which is what they refer to and intend) , and values vs. rhetoric.

Um..is this false?

Please feel free. Tear the assertion apart.

I know deflection is easier..but lets try to color within the lines. No?

your 'post' above makes no sense in any context I can see, in short what the heck are you talking about?
 
I agree with that, however the tea parties didn't begin with Santelli, either, just to inform teapartys.

The "tea-party" movement has been brewing for several years IMO.

I have been screaming since oh, as long as I can remember, about how the gov't has gotten WAY out of contrlol.

When they ran McCain out as the GOP candidate to run in 2008, I knew my fight wasnt with the left, it was with the so-called conservatives on the right.

Obama was the best thing that could have happened in 2008 (given our choices), b/c I dont believe the right would've mobilized against McCain like they have against Obama and the left.... at least thats what I think.

Lets not be too hard on Madeline. She is one of the nicer folks on here who wont go all "name cally" on you.
Its her opinion and she is entitled to be wrong :tongue: (luv ya Maddie)

The last I can't agree with on Madelbrain.

But, that's one thing the tea party is about. The fight isn't JUST with Democrats. It's with the RINOs in the GOP as well.

That's one reason BOTH parties are flummoxed by the Tea Party. They don't understand and they both feel threatened by the Tea Party AND THEY SHOULD!

Glen Beck is right about one thing. If the GOP screws us again, there won't be a third party, because it's the Republican party that will be gone.

;)
 
Well..yeah.

It's pretty obvious that the Tea Party movement reflects the values of the Birchers.

how so....exactly?

The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?

Oh? Cool. Love that whole "logic" thang. Let's try it on for size, shall we?

Communism calls for the redistribution of wealth.

Modern liberal Democratics call for the redistribution of wealth.

Therefore modern liberal Democratics are Communists.​
 
I agree with that, however the tea parties didn't begin with Santelli, either, just to inform teapartys.

The "tea-party" movement has been brewing for several years IMO.

I have been screaming since oh, as long as I can remember, about how the gov't has gotten WAY out of contrlol.

When they ran McCain out as the GOP candidate to run in 2008, I knew my fight wasnt with the left, it was with the so-called conservatives on the right.

Obama was the best thing that could have happened in 2008 (given our choices), b/c I dont believe the right would've mobilized against McCain like they have against Obama and the left.... at least thats what I think.

Lets not be too hard on Madeline. She is one of the nicer folks on here who wont go all "name cally" on you.
Its her opinion and she is entitled to be wrong :tongue: (luv ya Maddie)

Indeed, certainly goes back at least to Bush on 'immigration reform.' No accepting that and from that point on his numbers dropped and dropped and dropped. Mind you, both sides of the aisle in the government agreed with him. Again with spending in his last year and a half, when he went out agreeing to get spending passed at what level Obama wanted, last straw. He took the hit, so Obama wouldn't have to, but he agreed.

Now from the left we get called 'know-nothings' on the immigration reform, when instead all the folks I know that agree with tea parties are very much pro-immigration, just not illegal immigration. They want the borders protected and the war against our people down there to stop.

We expect Congress to pass a budget, as they are charged with doing. We expect them to leave us alone, not spying on folks without warrants.

Agreed that both parties (at least the Rinos in the GOP do) want to open up the flood gates on illegal immigration.

One of the reasons it's important to elected CONservatives on November 2 and not another set of RINOs.

I did what I could back during the primaries by voting in every conservative challenger to the usual set of nauseating RINOs that populate Ohio. Bleck!
 
:lol: I thought so...

pitiful. really.



Evidently its very hard for you. You don't even know the difference between a communist and a socialist ( European style which is what they refer to and intend) , and values vs. rhetoric.

Um..is this false?

Please feel free. Tear the assertion apart.

I know deflection is easier..but lets try to color within the lines. No?

your 'post' above makes no sense in any context I can see, in short what the heck are you talking about?

Reality doesn't make sense to people so steeped in fantasy either.

Cheers.
 
how so....exactly?

The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?

Oh? Cool. Love that whole "logic" thang. Let's try it on for size, shall we?

Communism calls for the redistribution of wealth.

Modern liberal Democratics call for the redistribution of wealth.

Therefore modern liberal Democratics are Communists.​

Exhibit A.
 
I dont understand how wanting to follow the Constitution and not spend ourselves into oblivion is hate.

That is not the point of the Op, Avatar. The Op is about the direct line between the Tea Party and Glenn Beck to the John Birch Society....a connection few tea party people likely know of or would welcome.

I dun know a single American who does not want the government to follow the constitution, and virtually everyone is very alarmed by the spending that has gone on (especially since it would appear so much money was wasted).

I am not trying to pin the hate badge on every Tea Party person; I am only trying to rouse you to guard against those who would (Glenn Beck, etc.).

I am getting kind of tired of this bullshit about Glenn Becks 'hate' speech. I have watched his fucking program, searched the net etc and find nothing more than unsubstantiated crap. People tell me he 'hates the victims of 9/11'... what is the truth of that? Well, one statement - which he clarified after saying it. The whole thing is, in my opinion, nothing more than the left not liking Beck because of his politics and his religion. If we are tolerant of other people's faiths, then why is being a Mormon different to being a Muslim? It isn't. He's a libertarian. Perhaps you should study what views Libertarians hold before you rant?
 
The Birchers called JFK a communist.

The Tea Party called Obama a communist.

That wasn't to hard? Was it?

Oh? Cool. Love that whole "logic" thang. Let's try it on for size, shall we?

Communism calls for the redistribution of wealth.

Modern liberal Democratics call for the redistribution of wealth.

Therefore modern liberal Democratics are Communists.​

Exhibit A.


It is like Exhibit A for how you don't have the first clue about formal logic -- or fallacies.
 
Approval ratings for Bush and Cheney amongst conservative Republicans were 75%-80% at the end of Bush's term.

But if you listen to them here on USMB, you'd think none of them actually ever supported the guy. :eusa_whistle:

Or that any of them were full on gungho pro-Iraq war. And 90% of your garden variety forum rightwingers hated Ron Paul. And Ron Paul WAS the Tea Party before it had a name.

If I were they I would label that with the euphemism - Intellectual Flexibility.

lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top