Taxing Labor

[Flanders]

The welfare state rests on the labors of others. Eliminating the tax on labor; i.e., the income tax, puts the parasite class on a fast track to extinction. A case heading to the Supreme Court ain’t as good as repealing the XVI Amendment but it might get the job done:

The government calls those who argue the income tax has no legal foundation “tax protesters” and labels their arguments “frivolous.” And usually judges toss their arguments out of court, assess them court costs on top of taxes, interest and penalties, and sometimes even threaten them if they file further cases.

But now the U.S. Supreme Court – the nine judges who sit on the bench in Washington by virtue of their selection by presidents and confirmation by the U.S. Senate – has docketed exactly that type of case.

XXXXX​

Among Maehr’s contentions is that while the government has the legal authority to tax, the Internal Revenue Service has used “unlawful, unconstitutional, unfair and biased” manipulations to assess income taxes on that which is not income – essentially salaries and wages.

Basing his argument on 10 years’ worth of research into tax law, he concludes that salaries and wages are the result of the mutual agreement among participants to exchange labor for money – and that’s not income.

So long as a case does not involve the government’s ill-gotten gains the High Court may or may not decide in favor of private sector Americans. The Rights of criminals is a perverted example of justices trying to show how humane they can be when money is not involved. Had those extraordinary court-ordered Rights cost the government a permanent loss of “income” criminals would know the meaning of cruel and unusual punishment.

Basically, no American should put a lot of trust in the Supreme Court in any case that takes money out of government pockets.

The ruling in the Affordable Healthcare Act makes me think the High Court is looking to strengthen the government’s power to tax income. In that sense it could be a good thing if the Court refuses to hear the case:

Officials with the Supreme Court said while the case has been docketed, and a response from the IRS already has been scheduled, the justices still must hold a conference on the case to determine whether, in fact, they will review the arguments.

Let’s not forget that the three ladies and Breyer will surely vote for the government. So once again it comes down to guessing if one of the remaining five will rollover.

When all is said and done repealing the XVI Amendment is still the best option.

Here’s Bob Unruh’s article for anyone who wants more details:

Supremes docket income tax challenge
Colorado man's challenge to IRS says wages don't count
Published: 11 hours ago
by BOB UNRUH

Supremes docket income tax challenge