Fair and simple taxes, public budgets that are balanced by law and transparency in all things politics. Then, build an economy that your kids can drive to the stars.
It ain't rocket science, y'all.
It ain't rocket science, y'all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Also, the middle class and small business creates more jobs than the rich.
To be precise, small business hires up to 2/3 of the work force every year.
So again, we keep flinging the "rich" term around without assigning it value. I can promise you that many think that someone starting a small business is "rich".
Fair and simple taxes, public budgets that are balanced by law and transparency in all things politics. Then, build an economy that your kids can drive to the stars.
It ain't rocket science, y'all.
For those on the left, and those in the middle and those really confused on the right, why do you want to see taxes increased, especially on the rich?
1. I am concerned with the rising debt.
2. I am concerned that entitlements may have to be cut.
3. I hate rich people.
4. I don't think we are paying our fair share.
Any others?
Fiscal responsibility.
As I've already said, last year the unfunded debt for both social security and Medicare exceed $7 trillion and is more wealth than all of the 1% of the wealthy in the US.
Would you then propose scaling back the entitlements and increase taxes on the rich to balance the books year by year?
Apparently O has classified you as rich if you make more than 200K a year. In the end though, it's all about the left's self gratification of making someone else pay.
The number used to be $250,000 and is falling by the day.
Again, I ask Obama supporters, who are the "rich"? I've yet to get an answer.
It doesn't matter what kind of ideas, resources or products an entrepreneur has, without a marketplace with money, not a single job will be created.
I honestly don't understand why we don't have a flat percentage tax on income or sales in the marketplace instead of fucking around with all this idiocy. That way everyone is getting hit evenly.
Fair and simple taxes, public budgets that are balanced by law and transparency in all things politics. Then, build an economy that your kids can drive to the stars.
It ain't rocket science, y'all.
Fair and simple taxes? What does that look like? Most would say that fair taxes should be progressive and be mostly for the "rich". Would you agree? If so, who are the "rich"?
As far as balancing budget, I hate to say it but you just earned the title extremist teabagger.
Are you suggesting that the government should then extract money from the "rich" and force feed the economy? If so, who are the "rich"?
Be more specific.
I honestly don't understand why we don't have a flat percentage tax on income or sales in the marketplace instead of fucking around with all this idiocy. That way everyone is getting hit evenly.
Apparently O has classified you as rich if you make more than 200K a year. In the end though, it's all about the left's self gratification of making someone else pay.
Also, the middle class and small business creates more jobs than the rich.
To be precise, small business hires up to 2/3 of the work force every year.
So again, we keep flinging the "rich" term around without assigning it value. I can promise you that many think that someone starting a small business is "rich".
It doesn't matter what kind of ideas, resources or products an entrepreneur has, without a marketplace with money, not a single job will be created.
Better question...who decides who gets the money and why?
Apparently O has classified you as rich if you make more than 200K a year. In the end though, it's all about the left's self gratification of making someone else pay.
The number used to be $250,000 and is falling by the day.
Again, I ask Obama supporters, who are the "rich"? I've yet to get an answer.
This thread is about who the "rich" are. Only one person has come forward and said that those making over $200,000 are rich. What say you?
Once we have assessed that, we are then free to appeal to the public to extract what we like from them. To this point, the only reasons given are to punish them for their abuses and not creating jobs. Personally, I can think of better punishments.
My guess is, however, that no one wants the government to increase taxes on those below the $200,000 level. In fact, no one in Washington would ever suggest such a thing because you need the masses to support tax increases, and that means picking on a minority. The 1% is a good start.
Of course, that did not stop the government from creating the largest tax hike on the Middle Class in the form of Obamacare, but it took Obama claiming it was not a tax all the way until it was needed to be declared a tax so that SCOTUS would not toss it out as unconstitutional.
Obama was successful in selling a massive tax increase on the middle class to the public, even left wingers and even though corporate America is now in charge of those tax rates. It was a masterful sell job, but that is what it takes to extract wealth from people who are the majority or near the majority.
I honestly don't understand why we don't have a flat percentage tax on income or sales in the marketplace instead of fucking around with all this idiocy. That way everyone is getting hit evenly.
AGREE
FairTax Video - Americans For Fair Taxation