Trump Tax increases for the wealthy?

[hadit]

Bwahahahaha! What a pipe dream! I've schooled you on this before. Did you forget?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

About taxing the rich when we have Debt, so they insist their public servants do a better job at managing our economy?

No, your fantasy that taxing the rich can reduce the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

Bwahahahaha! What a pipe dream! I've schooled you on this before. Did you forget?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

About taxing the rich when we have Debt, so they insist their public servants do a better job at managing our economy?

No, your fantasy that taxing the rich can reduce the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is stupid about it?

 

[hadit]

Bwahahahaha! What a pipe dream! I've schooled you on this before. Did you forget?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

About taxing the rich when we have Debt, so they insist their public servants do a better job at managing our economy?

No, your fantasy that taxing the rich can reduce the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is stupid about it?

I've already told you. Get out your notes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[danielpalos]

About taxing the rich when we have Debt, so they insist their public servants do a better job at managing our economy?

No, your fantasy that taxing the rich can reduce the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is stupid about it?

I've already told you. Get out your notes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, this is politics. You have to defend your position, every time it comes up.

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

 

[hadit]

No, your fantasy that taxing the rich can reduce the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is stupid about it?

I've already told you. Get out your notes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, this is politics. You have to defend your position, every time it comes up.

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

One, we ARE taxing the rich.
Two, taxing the rich more would do nothing to the debt. Get out your notes from the least time I schooled you if you don't know why.

Thus, the taxing of the rich would never end because the debt would never be retired. That is your real goal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Darkwind]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

 

[danielpalos]

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

Stupid. It won't work. You should have learned that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is stupid about it?

I've already told you. Get out your notes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, this is politics. You have to defend your position, every time it comes up.

It should be federal policy to tax the rich until the debt is gone.

One, we ARE taxing the rich.
Two, taxing the rich more would do nothing to the debt. Get out your notes from the least time I schooled you if you don't know why.

Thus, the taxing of the rich would never end because the debt would never be retired. That is your real goal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sure it will. Where do you think our creating financing is going now? The poor are not getting it.

 

[danielpalos]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

 

[Darkwind]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

 

[danielpalos]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

 

[Darkwind]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

So, again you are making it up. The legal concept of employment at will treats all parties equally.

You are just trying to justify the intentional targeting groups of people, and there is no moral justification for it.

 

[danielpalos]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

So, again you are making it up. The legal concept of employment at will treats all parties equally.

You are just trying to justify the intentional targeting groups of people, and there is no moral justification for it.

Equal protection of the law, is a fundamental concept, in law.

 

[Darkwind]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

So, again you are making it up. The legal concept of employment at will treats all parties equally.

You are just trying to justify the intentional targeting groups of people, and there is no moral justification for it.

Equal protection of the law, is a fundamental concept, in law.

You have failed to produce any evidence that citizens paying taxes under differing standards, chosen by the government, equates to equal protection under law.

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

So, again you are making it up. The legal concept of employment at will treats all parties equally.

You are just trying to justify the intentional targeting groups of people, and there is no moral justification for it.

Equal protection of the law, is a fundamental concept, in law.

You have failed to produce any evidence that citizens paying taxes under differing standards, chosen by the government, equates to equal protection under law.

why, are they not paying a tax? Under capitalism, payment is based on ability.

 

[hadit]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

And there it is. The inevitable veering into your pet distraction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Darkwind]

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

So, again you are making it up. The legal concept of employment at will treats all parties equally.

You are just trying to justify the intentional targeting groups of people, and there is no moral justification for it.

Equal protection of the law, is a fundamental concept, in law.

You have failed to produce any evidence that citizens paying taxes under differing standards, chosen by the government, equates to equal protection under law.

why, are they not paying a tax? Under capitalism, payment is based on ability.

No its not. Payment is based upon a mutually agreed upon product or service and is negotiable.

The entire tax structure is based upon inequality and is a deliberate targeting of groups of people at all ends of the spectrum.

 

[danielpalos]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

And there it is. The inevitable veering into your pet distraction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nothing but diversion is no better than nothing but repeal.

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

It could guarantee a form of minimum wage for unemployed labor.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Obviously, when the government doesn't pay you unemployment benefits for sitting at home smoking weed, they're treating you unfairly.

DERP!

 

[danielpalos]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Obviously, when the government doesn't pay you unemployment benefits for sitting at home smoking weed, they're treating you unfairly.

DERP!

Should I incorporate and ask for corporate welfare?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I wholeheartedly oppose government singling out any group of people on the basis of any metric. It is morally wrong.

The right wing claim the poor simply are not worth, equal protection of the law.

You just told a lie.

Provide Me the exact quote of any right-wing person who id that the poor do not deserve equal protection under the law. Not paying taxes wien others do is favoritism and government targeting a group of people.

Ask every right winger, when it comes to equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

Obviously, when the government doesn't pay you unemployment benefits for sitting at home smoking weed, they're treating you unfairly.

DERP!

Should I incorporate and ask for corporate welfare?

Go for it.