Surprise Surprise the foiled Attack was by an Arab Muslim Immigrant!

[GHook93]

FOXNews.com - American Who Recently Visited Pakistan Eyed in Times Square Bomb Plot

He originated from Pakistan and was naturalized as a citizen. Another attempted terrorist attack by a Muslim, yet racial profiling Muslims is wrong!

Racial profiling Muslims is impossible because Muslim is not a race.

Therefore if we profile based on Muslims identity, then they can't call it racially profiling and we are off the hook! Alright baby we are in business!

 

[bodecea]

The people of the USA need to wake up. The world changed on 9-11-01. Our self proclaimed enemies changed the rules of warfare. We truly need to make some adjustments and changes to defeat them. Until we do expect more car bombs, underware bombs, and God only knows what else they will dream up.

We will not defeat terrorism by being a nice guy.

What do you suggest be done?

That's the tough part. Honestly i do not know for certain and am not qualified to say. I do know that we cannot worry so much about the rights of a terrorist. We actually charged our own special forces because a terrorist got a fat lip. These are the things that they look at an laugh about because it shows that we are weak. We fight against the PAT ACT, when we probably should make it stronger we make it weaker. When a State decides to stop illegal entry into the country we go ballistic and claim it isn't fair.

We need to have immigration reform. We need to stop everyone from entering the USA without going through a background check. We need to stop playing the nice guy with terrorism. We need to "Cry 'Havoc', and let slip the dogs of war". Lots of ideas, I'm sure many people will of course disagree. Some will call me names, some will say I'm nuts or something similar. I don't really care.

I care that we fight this war on terror and win it. That those who decide to commit acts of terror against American citizens have a fear of retaliation so great that they do not commit the acts.

Anything has to be better than ignoring the problems or appeasement.

You're really not said anything specific here, you know.

 

[SFC Ollie]

What do you suggest be done?

That's the tough part. Honestly i do not know for certain and am not qualified to say. I do know that we cannot worry so much about the rights of a terrorist. We actually charged our own special forces because a terrorist got a fat lip. These are the things that they look at an laugh about because it shows that we are weak. We fight against the PAT ACT, when we probably should make it stronger we make it weaker. When a State decides to stop illegal entry into the country we go ballistic and claim it isn't fair.

We need to have immigration reform. We need to stop everyone from entering the USA without going through a background check. We need to stop playing the nice guy with terrorism. We need to "Cry 'Havoc', and let slip the dogs of war". Lots of ideas, I'm sure many people will of course disagree. Some will call me names, some will say I'm nuts or something similar. I don't really care.

I care that we fight this war on terror and win it. That those who decide to commit acts of terror against American citizens have a fear of retaliation so great that they do not commit the acts.

Anything has to be better than ignoring the problems or appeasement.

You're really not said anything specific here, you know.

As I highlighted. I can only suggest vague outlines. Not so sure I would want to have to make the decisions that must be made. I know we are not wining the war against terror or should I say "overseas contingency". We've gotten lucky twice, what happens next?

 

[Jos]

Aliou Niasse, a street vendor selling framed photographs of New York, said that he was the first to spot the car containing the bomb, which pulled up right in front of his cart on the corner of 45th street and Broadway next to the Marriott hotel.

“I didn’t see the car pull up or notice the driver because I was busy with customers. But when I looked up I saw that smoke appeared to be coming from the car. This would have been around 6.30pm.

“I thought I should call 911, but my English is not very good and I had no credit left on my phone, so I walked over to Lance, who has the T-shirt stall next to mine, and told him. He said we shouldn’t call 911. Immediately he alerted a police officer near by,” said Mr Niasse, who is originally from Senegal

Unexploded car bomb in Times Square 'amateurish one-off' terrorism attempt - Times Online

Yet one fact being ignored in the American media’s sensationalist narrative about the failed bombing is that the man who was responsible for police finding the bomb was Muslim. The UK’s Times Online reports that Aliou Niasse, a Senagalese Muslim immigrant who works as a photograph vendor on Times Square, was the first to bring the smoking car to the police’s attention:

Think Progress Media Ignore The Fact That Man Who Alerted Police To Failed Times Square Bombing Is A Muslim Immigrant

 

[Father Time]

FOXNews.com - American Who Recently Visited Pakistan Eyed in Times Square Bomb Plot

He originated from Pakistan and was naturalized as a citizen. Another attempted terrorist attack by a Muslim, yet racial profiling Muslims is wrong!

Racial profiling Muslims is impossible because Muslim is not a race.

Therefore if we profile based on Muslims identity, then they can't call it racially profiling and we are off the hook! Alright baby we are in business!

Next we'll profile Christians as potential abortion clinic bombers.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Racial profiling Muslims is impossible because Muslim is not a race.

Therefore if we profile based on Muslims identity, then they can't call it racially profiling and we are off the hook! Alright baby we are in business!

Next we'll profile Christians as potential abortion clinic bombers.

Why not? Your Department of homeland security profiled right wing veterans as possible terrorists. I loved it when the National Commander of the American Legion made Janet apologize for that one. Not that she still doesn't believe that.

 

[saveliberty]

The first group of people who want to label someone is a liberal. The hypocracy of their rants about profiling are comical.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

once again neocons show their contempt for the constitution

Well... Neo-Cons are Progressives and Progressives are leftists; and Leftists do not even recognize the US Constitution except where it is protects there means to undermine it.

Of course you're referring to to Conservatives... who oppose Neo-cons, progressives, Liberals, Socialists and all of the other machinations of Anti-Americanism... and your hope is to convey that Conservatives are somehow showing contempt for the US Constitution.

Naturally, as is ALWAYS the case in these circumstances, you've failed to specify the Individual, their position and the element of the US Constitution which is being contemptuously violated...

And the reason that ya do this is to deceitfully project that such contempt is being advance not by progressive Neo-Cons... but by the Conservatives who ya hope to tie to other 'NEO' types... through the use of that fraudulent term.

Now understand that this post IS a direct and unambiguous challenge to you to post your evidence which sustains your now throughly discredited assertion.

Fail to do so... and you CONCEDEto me... that you're argument here is ignorant, principle-less deceit; that such is a fraud which you sought to perpetrate on this board.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Racial profiling Muslims is impossible because Muslim is not a race.

Therefore if we profile based on Muslims identity, then they can't call it racially profiling and we are off the hook! Alright baby we are in business!

Next we'll profile Christians as potential abortion clinic bombers.

Why? There are no Christian movements bombing abortion Clinics. There are thousands of Christian organizations which contest abortion... Peaceful, principled contests; which have never failed to reject violent, principle-less action... in stark contrast to Islam which IN LARGE MEASURE embraces violence; a religion which presently represents one side of nearly every war presently being waged on the planet.

 

[Contumacious]

Surprise Surprise the foiled Attack was by a Muslim Immigrant!

Let me explain to you the most fundamental principle of American foreign policy: Any country where the people have unpronounceable names can be bombed by the US with impunity. For you Rockwell readers who are a little slow on the uptake, "impunity" means they aren’t allowed to bomb us back. "We called no tag-backs." It hardly qualifies as impunity when they blow up our biggest buildings, now does it? They aren’t playing by the rules.

.

 

[Gunny]

yep honey,, u izz a racist pig,, but bear in mind the FBI racially profiles serial killers and they be white guys..

No they don't.

Yes they do. Try again? Logic and fact this time would be appreciated.

 

[Gunny]

FOXNews.com - American Who Recently Visited Pakistan Eyed in Times Square Bomb Plot

He originated from Pakistan and was naturalized as a citizen. Another attempted terrorist attack by a Muslim, yet racial profiling Muslims is wrong!

See, like I said earlier today, all the wingnut protestations about Arizona's law not being racial profiling is irrelevant, to them.

Conservatives want racial profiling.

Idiots can't call a rose a rose. Fool.

 

[Father Time]

Therefore if we profile based on Muslims identity, then they can't call it racially profiling and we are off the hook! Alright baby we are in business!

Next we'll profile Christians as potential abortion clinic bombers.

Why? There are no Christian movements bombing abortion Clinics. There are thousands of Christian organizations which contest abortion... Peaceful, principled contests; which have never failed to reject violent, principle-less action... in stark contrast to Islam which IN LARGE MEASURE embraces violence; a religion which presently represents one side of nearly every war presently being waged on the planet.

And there's a lot of Muslims who don't belong to such organizations. If you find a member of such organization then no one would deny that that's the kind of person to keep an eye on.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Surprise Surprise the foiled Attack was by a Muslim Immigrant!

Let me explain to you the most fundamental principle of American foreign policy: Any country where the people have unpronounceable names can be bombed by the US with impunity. For you Rockwell readers who are a little slow on the uptake, "impunity" means they aren’t allowed to bomb us back. "We called no tag-backs." It hardly qualifies as impunity when they blow up our biggest buildings, now does it? They aren’t playing by the rules.

.

LOL... Uh... Point of Order Mr. Chariman...

The Member advances a position which is wholly false, overtly deceitful and entirely FRAUDULENT!

Understand what is being said through this argument... it is ESSENTIAL that we do so... as this is a rising 'principle' within the anti-American boil which is rising on our collective, cultural ass.

"Let me explain to you the most fundamental principle of American foreign policy: Any country where the people have unpronounceable names can be bombed by the US with impunity. For you Rockwell readers who are a little slow on the uptake, "impunity" means they aren’t allowed to bomb us back. "We called no tag-backs." It hardly qualifies as impunity when they blow up our biggest buildings, now does it? They aren’t playing by the rules."

Understand what she's saying...

The US has abused the world with our defense of freedom for too long; and the world's socialists are TIRED; they're PISSED and they aren't going to TAKE IT ANY MORE!

Recognize that what this Progressive is telling you here, is that 'all of the attacks upon the US prior to 9-11 and 9-11 were 'Tag-backs'; the idiot bomber in Times Square... the various under garment and shoe bombers... the dozens of other attacks which have been thwarted; along with the ones which we will not catch; which we will not prevent... which will murder innocent people on mass... that this is simply the world's socialists throwin' down some PAIN for what we did to them, because they attacked us.

Naturally, this should NOT be seen as any talk of sedition, subversion; the member is in NO WAY publically declaring that she is overtly lending aid and comfort to the enemy here... No one should recognize her comments as a sign that she's adhering to the enemy, in a time of war.

All she is doing is claiming her RIGHT TO SPEAK OPENLY AND FREELY! She is likewise claiming THE RIGHT TO FREELY MOVE AROUND THE PLANET; for those oppressed people to come and go without notice or restriction, from the United States... We can be sure that she is DEMANDING HER RIGHT THAT HER COMMUNICATIONS, PAPERS and EFFECTS, not be seized, or otherwise subjected to interference... That the US not profile Brown skinned, black haired people with a history of chronic Islam... or are known to have suffered a recent infection...

She's telling us that SHE HAS A RIGHT TO SPEAK AND THOSE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SOME PAY! And this is because: It's only FAIR!

Of course, the bad news for the Moderate, Centrist, Mainstream Progressive Socialist is that all rights are sustained by responsibility... and since all of those things fail to recognize, respect and bear the responsibility inherent in our divinely endowned, unalienable, human rights... they forfeit the rights which are sustained by those responsibilities which they've REJECTED OR OTHERWISE FAILED TO BEAR.

So what the Socialist is telling you, is that YOU DESERVE TO BE SLAUGHTERED in a sneak attack on your person; your children deserve to be slaughtered... your family and friends are culpable for the actions of your government; who has taken on the task of removing MASS MURDERING SOCIALIST TYRANTS from government control over TENS OF MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS... and that she intends to advance her human and legal rights promote those murders and its not fair for you to even discuss the recognition that those waging war on innocent people: HAVE NO RIGHTS...

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

What? No snappy comebacks?