rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 288,887
- 170,261
- 2,615
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
.
.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is what you type...when youre mentally ill.This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.
Huh? Your taxes didnt increase because of papaca and you also no longer share as big a burden as those treated but without care.Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
Another loss for the American Taxpayer who is forced support another entitlement.
Thanks loads SC.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
If the statutory language is plain, the Court must enforce it according to its terms. But oftentimes the meaning—or ambiguity—of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context. So when deciding whether the language is plain, the Court must read the words “in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
It depends what the incentive is. "We know where your family is." Can be a huge incentive.Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.
Surely you can cough up a link to prove that nonsense.