danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #341
Our First Amendment covers not-for-profits as Persons engaged in Commerce more than it does for-profit Firms engaged as Merchants in Commerce; there is no appeal to ignorance of accommodation laws on a for-profit basis.Sorry but that is not true. There is not BUTS in the first amendment.Not on a for-profit basis as merchants in Commerce and specifically not Religion; there is no appeal to ignorance of accommodation laws.Tell that to the baker who is might have to pay $130,000 for telling a homosexual fascist that they didn't want to cater their ceremony....They have a RIGHT to refuse service on religious beliefs according to the first amendment ....No one is being 'forced' to participate in 'sin,' the notion is ignorant idiocy.Absolutely nothing to do with what I posted. If a person doesn't want to participate in what he thinks as sin then go find a person who will.Individual Liberty may be indistinguishable from doing unto others as we would have others do unto us.