Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL What IS a far right lunatic...oh...i think i have a meme for that.Oh that can't be right.
Only the far right lunatics would have voted that way.
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHJAJAHA
If only the House, when controlled by the Glorious 1,000 year Reich, was ALL of Congress
If only!
9-0 what? That STATES can't remove national candidates on their own.
That maybe correct but ruling that's it's up to partisans in Congress to enforce eligibility is dog shit.
LOLOL Don't know if you know this bud, but Americans have the right and responsibility to overthrow a tyrannical lying corrupt government. You're just effing lucky they're not doing it with guns.Senate voted 57–43 that Trump incited insurrection.
So both HOUSE AND SENATE already voted that YES, Trump was involved in the insurection.
If Congress did it's damn job as USSC presumes in this ruling then Trump would be inelligible.
Thats right, what else are going to say to irrefutable facts?LOLOL
It was a 9-0 decision you nitwit. Very seldom do all the Justices agree on the same thing.Conservative SC majority is now shedding any pretence still left to partisan impartiality.
Trump has little to stand on in his criminal trials, so his only end game is delaying them long enough to again make it to the White House and put himself above the law.
Nobody seriously thinks SC is going to grant Trump immunity, nobody thinks they will overturn iron-clad lower court ruling....but we have a Supreme Court that seems to be willing to use that excuse to play along and halt Trump's criminal trials for months, making it near impossible from them to complete before election.
It's been 135 days since Jack Smith asked the court to expedite descision on immunuty...nope! They insist on taking no less than 5 months to settle an obvious no-brainer outcome.
Even if there was some argument about how busy they are or how complex of case this is , they still didn't have to do it this way. SC could have simply allowed the trials to go on, while they square away these go-nowhere immunity claims.
In Taking Up Trump’s Immunity Claim, Supreme Court Bolstered His Delay Strategy
By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.www.nytimes.com
We knew Thomas was an unrepentant Trumptard and Alito is not far behind, but for the rest to go along with this ridiculous shit?
This marks a whole new low for Supreme Court, whole new level of partisanship and this is not going to end well.
If anyone, it's know-nothing yahoos and nutbags like you that are going to bring down this great country.LOLOL Don't know if you know this bud, but Americans have the right and responsibility to overthrow a tyrannical lying corrupt government. You're just effing lucky they're not doing it with guns.
LOLOL Don't know if you know this bud, but Americans have the right and responsibility to overthrow a tyrannical lying corrupt government. You're just effing lucky they're not doing it with guns.
It's the voters.AND? It is probably correct to keep individual states from being able to disqualify national candidates, but there needs to be a good answer to WHO has the final say on eligibility.
Voters should vote on Consitutional eligibility for a vote they are casting...have you been dropped on your head recently?
? What you are saying about voters deciding a Constitutional qualification is really stupid.you are really panicked.
stop hating America, asswipe
Just keep panicking.? What you are saying about voters deciding a Constitutional qualification is really stupid.
What if voters elect a 30 year old to be POTUS? Do you seriously suggest voters should be able to constradict and over-ride Constitution?
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHJAJAHA