Summary of Evidence Released - What It Says

There are procedures in place for Carter Page to object, and the Republicans, Nunes and Ryan screwed that up big time, because they wanted to have a dog and pony show....

He could have gone to the FISA court, with his claim, and the FISA COURT will have 3 of their judges pick by Chief Justice Roberts, as a panel to review the case....if Page was spied on illegally, then the restitution by law, is $1000 a day, for every day they spied on him, wrongfully.

And simultaneously, the Inspector General would be triggered to investigate the FBI agents and Justice Department and the FISA judge, to see if what they've done was criminal.

What Nunes/Ryan did and the way they did it, outside of the full Intelligence Committee, so it could be done in their partisan manner with all the hoop dee dah propaganda campaign of #releasethememo for two weeks in advance, when they KNEW no one could stop them frm releasing the memo on the Democratic side due to being in the minority, and because they were already in cohoots with the president to release it,

assured that not a single Democrat would believe it....

so, that tells me, and anyone with a brain, that this circus of theirs, was premeditated, and simply

MEANT TO DIVIDE US, for their own political posturing...none of them give a flying hoot about Carter Page or the FISA court....

It's just been one big RUSE..... :(
Doubtful Page was spied on illegally, since he touted kremlin contacts in 2013 letter.
And this probable cause.
Its all really absurd, since this is a small part of the Russia investigation.
That's probably cause of nothing. That's why they didn't use it to get a FISA warrant.

That's right, dope. Only the parts that were relevant to Page were used in the warrant application that was specific to Page.

You're getting it. Albeit very, very slowly.
You're confusing the dossier with this letter where page supposedly "touts" his Kremlin contacts.

I'm not at all. Read the dossier, dope.
 
The FBI was onto Page for years. Page was their target, not Trump. Had Trump been their target, they would have spied on Trump... or someone actually in his campaign... or someone in his family... at the very least, someone he knew.
"On to Page?" He hasn't been charged with anything, so what were the "on to?"

All you proved is that the FBI had a vendetta against an innocent man.
LOL

That he hasn’t been caught doing anything illegal doesn’t mean the investigation into him was unwarranted. Moron, that’s the purpose of investigating him.

Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
 
"On to Page?" He hasn't been charged with anything, so what were the "on to?"

All you proved is that the FBI had a vendetta against an innocent man.
LOL

That he hasn’t been caught doing anything illegal doesn’t mean the investigation into him was unwarranted. Moron, that’s the purpose of investigating him.

Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.
 
LOL

That he hasn’t been caught doing anything illegal doesn’t mean the investigation into him was unwarranted. Moron, that’s the purpose of investigating him.

Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.
Dayam, you’re one persistent retard.

Page was not with the Trump campaign when the warrant was sought. He never met Trump and never talked to him nor did he ever give Trump any advice. Even worse, Page was “in play” since 2013.

In which rightard universe is ^^^ that ^^^ spying on Trump?
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.
 
LOL

That he hasn’t been caught doing anything illegal doesn’t mean the investigation into him was unwarranted. Moron, that’s the purpose of investigating him.

Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.

Page wasn't even a member of the Trump campaign when the FISA wiretap request was granted.

Herr Nunes lied to you.
 
Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.
Dayam, you’re one persistent retard.

Page was not with the Trump campaign when the warrant was sought. He never met Trump and never talked to him nor did he ever give Trump any advice. Even worse, Page was “in play” since 2013.

In which rightard universe is ^^^ that ^^^ spying on Trump?
A few months ago all you idiots were claiming Page was the proof that Trump was colluding with the Russians. Now you claim he had nothing to do with it.
 
LOL

That he hasn’t been caught doing anything illegal doesn’t mean the investigation into him was unwarranted. Moron, that’s the purpose of investigating him.

Wrong. The justice system is supposed to investigate crimes. Conducting investigations on people purely because other people don't like them is what they do in totalitarian states.

No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.


Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.

Liar.

Mueller wouldn't be where he is if Trump hadn't fired Comey.
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.
 
No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.
Dayam, you’re one persistent retard.

Page was not with the Trump campaign when the warrant was sought. He never met Trump and never talked to him nor did he ever give Trump any advice. Even worse, Page was “in play” since 2013.

In which rightard universe is ^^^ that ^^^ spying on Trump?
A few months ago all you idiots were claiming Page was the proof that Trump was colluding with the Russians. Now you claim he had nothing to do with it.
I said nothing of the sort. Regardless, Nunes’ memo wasn’t out a few months ago. It just came out last week and it proves that Page was no longer with the Trump campaign when the FBI sought a FISA warrant to spy on him.
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.
 
No, dope. The FISA system's role is not criminal investigation. It's role is intelligence gathering on foreigners or in Page's case, American citizens who are acting as agents or assets of foreign governments or their intelligence services.
I'm talking about this witch hunt that Herr Mewler is running, dumbass.

It has nothing to do with the warrant on page, dope. It has everything to do with our intelligence agencies gathering Intel on Russia in the wake of their attack against our electoral process. Page is no doubt just one of many sources that were put in to play for that end.
Page was "put into play" to spy on the Trump campaign, moron. The espionage on him was used to justify the Herr Mewler witch hunt.
Dayam, you’re one persistent retard.

Page was not with the Trump campaign when the warrant was sought. He never met Trump and never talked to him nor did he ever give Trump any advice. Even worse, Page was “in play” since 2013.

In which rightard universe is ^^^ that ^^^ spying on Trump?
A few months ago all you idiots were claiming Page was the proof that Trump was colluding with the Russians. Now you claim he had nothing to do with it.

I never said any such thing- you must be thinking of GOP idiots.

Was Page colluding with the Russians while Page was part of the Trump campaign? We just don't know.

We do know from the Trump campaign and from Page himself- that Page was no longer part of the Trump campaign when the FBI requested the FISA warrent.

So tell me this- if the FISA warrent request was targeting the Trump campaign- why did they target a former campaign member- not an actual member of the campaign?
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.

Who is telling you that you have to 'respect' the Steele dossier? Certainly not me- who is saying you have to believe the Steel dossier?

And who are you to tell me I have to respect the Nunes steaming pile of a hit piece?

Remember- the entire theme of the Nunes hit piece is the claim that the FBI did not reveal the bias of the Steele Dossier to the court- but Nunes lied about that in the memo- flat out lied in the memo about that.

Far from everything being 'verified' what the FBI and others have pointed out is that the Nunes memo has falsehoods, and also left out key data. Matter of fact- the Nunes memo is everything the GOP claims the Steele memo is- it is politically biased, produced by a man with a open bias towards President Trump. It leaves out key information- stating that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrats- but leaving out that it was also funded by Conservatives. The Nunes memo also leaves out that the FBI knew that the Russians attempted to recruit Page several years ago- so he was a person of interest even before any of this happened.

And finally- how the hell can this be proof of an attack on the Trump campaign- when Page wasn't a member of the Trump campaign anymore?
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.

Who is telling you that you have to 'respect' the Steele dossier? Certainly not me- who is saying you have to believe the Steel dossier?

And who are you to tell me I have to respect the Nunes steaming pile of a hit piece?

Remember- the entire theme of the Nunes hit piece is the claim that the FBI did not reveal the bias of the Steele Dossier to the court- but Nunes lied about that in the memo- flat out lied in the memo about that.

Far from everything being 'verified' what the FBI and others have pointed out is that the Nunes memo has falsehoods, and also left out key data. Matter of fact- the Nunes memo is everything the GOP claims the Steele memo is- it is politically biased, produced by a man with a open bias towards President Trump. It leaves out key information- stating that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrats- but leaving out that it was also funded by Conservatives. The Nunes memo also leaves out that the FBI knew that the Russians attempted to recruit Page several years ago- so he was a person of interest even before any of this happened.

And finally- how the hell can this be proof of an attack on the Trump campaign- when Page wasn't a member of the Trump campaign anymore?

Okay, so no problem then accurately describing the dossier as a steaming pile that should not have been used to get permission to spy on an American. Works for me.
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.

Who is telling you that you have to 'respect' the Steele dossier? Certainly not me- who is saying you have to believe the Steel dossier?

And who are you to tell me I have to respect the Nunes steaming pile of a hit piece?

Remember- the entire theme of the Nunes hit piece is the claim that the FBI did not reveal the bias of the Steele Dossier to the court- but Nunes lied about that in the memo- flat out lied in the memo about that.

Far from everything being 'verified' what the FBI and others have pointed out is that the Nunes memo has falsehoods, and also left out key data. Matter of fact- the Nunes memo is everything the GOP claims the Steele memo is- it is politically biased, produced by a man with a open bias towards President Trump. It leaves out key information- stating that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrats- but leaving out that it was also funded by Conservatives. The Nunes memo also leaves out that the FBI knew that the Russians attempted to recruit Page several years ago- so he was a person of interest even before any of this happened.

And finally- how the hell can this be proof of an attack on the Trump campaign- when Page wasn't a member of the Trump campaign anymore?
Not only was Page cut off from the campaign, he was barely ever attached; according to a Trump attorney...

You were merely one of the many people named to a foreign policy advisory committee in March of 2016 -- a committee that met one time. You never met Mr. Trump, nor did you ever ‘advise’ Mr. Trump about anything. You are thus not an ‘advisor’ to Mr. Trump in any sense of the word.”
 
House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.

Who is telling you that you have to 'respect' the Steele dossier? Certainly not me- who is saying you have to believe the Steel dossier?

And who are you to tell me I have to respect the Nunes steaming pile of a hit piece?

Remember- the entire theme of the Nunes hit piece is the claim that the FBI did not reveal the bias of the Steele Dossier to the court- but Nunes lied about that in the memo- flat out lied in the memo about that.

Far from everything being 'verified' what the FBI and others have pointed out is that the Nunes memo has falsehoods, and also left out key data. Matter of fact- the Nunes memo is everything the GOP claims the Steele memo is- it is politically biased, produced by a man with a open bias towards President Trump. It leaves out key information- stating that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrats- but leaving out that it was also funded by Conservatives. The Nunes memo also leaves out that the FBI knew that the Russians attempted to recruit Page several years ago- so he was a person of interest even before any of this happened.

And finally- how the hell can this be proof of an attack on the Trump campaign- when Page wasn't a member of the Trump campaign anymore?

Let's not forget that the Trump campaign dropped page like a hot potato and tripped over themselves trying to minimize his role and distance him from the key campaign members. They knew what was coming.
 
LOL except now we know that Nunes lied about the political origins being excluded from the FISA applications.

This 'memo' was never anything more than a Republican propaganda piece intended to provide cover for Trump.

Hell even saying the Trump campaign was targeted was a clear lie- since Page had not been a member of the Trump campaign for a month when the FISA was requested.

Hmmm, what's the gibberish about the dossier, that parts of it were verified and thus it should not be disparaged?

I think the left should take the same approach with the Nunes summary. You know, if you start to whine that it says things you think should be false, just remember that parts of it are verified.

I am afraid I don't understand your gibberish.

What we do know from Nunes himself- that the claim in the memo that the FBI never told the court about the political origins of the Steele Dossier was a lie.

How much else was also a lie from Nunes- we just don't know.

But it is very obvious that the Nunes 'memo' is nothing more than a GOP hit piece to give cover to Trump.

The dossier was a steaming pile hit piece on Trump, yet we're supposed to respect it and not demand its author face consequences because "parts of it were verified". Likewise, it is fair to demand respect for the Nunes summary because most of it, with the possible exception of this one little piece, has also been verified. Not expecting consistency here, but noting the hysteria.

Who is telling you that you have to 'respect' the Steele dossier? Certainly not me- who is saying you have to believe the Steel dossier?

And who are you to tell me I have to respect the Nunes steaming pile of a hit piece?

Remember- the entire theme of the Nunes hit piece is the claim that the FBI did not reveal the bias of the Steele Dossier to the court- but Nunes lied about that in the memo- flat out lied in the memo about that.

Far from everything being 'verified' what the FBI and others have pointed out is that the Nunes memo has falsehoods, and also left out key data. Matter of fact- the Nunes memo is everything the GOP claims the Steele memo is- it is politically biased, produced by a man with a open bias towards President Trump. It leaves out key information- stating that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrats- but leaving out that it was also funded by Conservatives. The Nunes memo also leaves out that the FBI knew that the Russians attempted to recruit Page several years ago- so he was a person of interest even before any of this happened.

And finally- how the hell can this be proof of an attack on the Trump campaign- when Page wasn't a member of the Trump campaign anymore?

Okay, so no problem then accurately describing the dossier as a steaming pile that should not have been used to get permission to spy on an American. Works for me.

Page himself, in his testimony to congress, verified a number of claims made about him in the dossier.

Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
 

Forum List

Back
Top