Suddenly we must get rid of Billionaires

[Manonthestreet]

to save our demockracy, well maybe not all just one uppity one probably would do right libs.

Outlaw billionaires to save democracy: MSNBC analyst

MSNBC political analyst Anand Giridharadas suggested on Monday that it was only a “policy choice” that allows billionaires like Elon Musk to flourish in the United States.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Moonglow]

I agree, let us abolish gross wealth accumulation.

 

[rightwinger]

We don’t need to abolish Billionaires

But then we don’t have to pass legislation that allows them to accumulate and protect additional wealth

 

[talksalot]

We don’t need to abolish Billionaires

But then we don’t have to pass legislation that allows them to accumulate and protect additional wealth

Liberals bleed green.....with envy.

 

[fncceo]

I agree, let us abolish gross wealth accumulation.

Actually, we would better off abolishing poor folks, except the ones who mow our lawns and wash our cars.

 

[1srelluc]

Actually, we would better off abolishing poor folks, except the ones who mow our lawns and wash our cars.

The guy that provides my lawn service sure as hell isn't poor.

 

[fncceo]

The guy that provides my lawn service sure as hell isn't poor.

Is this a great country, or what?

 

[1srelluc]

Is this a great country, or what?

Damn straight!

 

[Yarddog]

I agree, let us abolish gross wealth accumulation.

No No you got it all wrong. lets just get rid of the richest people every year. cant stop at the billionaires. Why is it right to posses 20 million? how can you justify owning 20 million in liquid assets?

 

[Yarddog]

We don’t need to abolish Billionaires

But then we don’t have to pass legislation that allows them to accumulate and protect additional wealth

Well, depends what that legislation says. The fact that it might protect billionaires just might not tell the whole story of the bill.

 

[francoHFW]

to save our demockracy, well maybe not all just one uppity one probably would do right libs.

Outlaw billionaires to save democracy: MSNBC analyst

MSNBC political analyst Anand Giridharadas suggested on Monday that it was only a “policy choice” that allows billionaires like Elon Musk to flourish in the United States.

www.foxnews.com

because if you count all taxes, we have a flat tax system which is a huge giveaway to the rich and why we don't have enough money to invest in America. Great job GOP. Worst upward mobility and inequality homelessness and garbage propaganda ever

 

[Moonglow]

No No you got it all wrong. lets just get rid of the richest people every year. cant stop at the billionaires. Why is it right to posses 20 million? how can you justify owning 20 million in liquid assets?

True, according to Jesus Christ it's wrong, m'kay.

 

[sparky]

lets just get rid of the richest people every year.

expecting the best Congress they can buy to do so might be a tad problematic Dog.....~S~

 

[Yarddog]

True, according to Jesus Christ it's wrong, m'kay.

so therefore according to Jesus Christ it's wrong t have a wealthy successful society right? It's the mental block all communists and socialists have in their DNA, if you want a successful society with nice things like Infrastructure and reliability , you need to have successful businesses, that needs to be determined by the private sector not government. You cant expect someone to have a successful business and then be poor. It doesnt work that way.

 

[Captain Caveman]

to save our demockracy, well maybe not all just one uppity one probably would do right libs.

Outlaw billionaires to save democracy: MSNBC analyst

MSNBC political analyst Anand Giridharadas suggested on Monday that it was only a “policy choice” that allows billionaires like Elon Musk to flourish in the United States.

www.foxnews.com

Democracy - people make laws, so they vote for representatives to make laws.

So don't tell me, the Left think they need to get rid of billionaires to save democracy, the Left that didn't recognize Trump as their president after a democratic election?

 

[Yarddog]

Democracy - people make laws, so they vote for representatives to make laws.

So don't tell me, the Left think they need to get rid of billionaires to save democracy, the Left that didn't recognize Trump as their president after a democratic election?

Even if they took all the money away from Billionaires, the government would still need to end up printing more money to pay for all their programs. They're playing the class game again to put Americans against each other.
Guess they are just still upset about Musk buying out Twitter. They hate the idea of free speech, even though they will have the same right to be heard. If Leftist progs are unable to silence others it's a threat to democracy. Just like the Hunter Biden laptop was really just Dangerous mis-information that needed to be silenced ...until OOOPS it was really real.

 

[Moonglow]

so therefore according to Jesus Christ it's wrong t have a wealthy successful society right? It's the mental block all communists and socialists have in their DNA, if you want a successful society with nice things like Infrastructure and reliability , you need to have successful businesses, that needs to be determined by the private sector not government. You cant expect someone to have a successful business and then be poor. It doesnt work that way.

Is that the reason ancient Israel failed?

 

[BackAgain]

I agree, let us abolish gross wealth accumulation.

On the basis of … ?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Even if they took all the money away from Billionaires, the government would still need to end up printing more money to pay for all their programs. They're playing the class game again to put Americans against each other.
Guess they are just still upset about Musk buying out Twitter. They hate the idea of free speech, even though they will have the same right to be heard. If Leftist progs are unable to silence others it's a threat to democracy. Just like the Hunter Biden laptop was really just Dangerous mis-information that needed to be silenced ...until OOOPS it was really real.

If America believes in free speech, then right across the board, have free speech. To say free speech is limited to government level and not corporate level, it's not 'free' speech, it's free speech with limitations and censorship. And the biggest party for censorship, are the Democrats.

 

[progressive hunter]

If America believes in free speech, then right across the board, have free speech. To say free speech is limited to government level and not corporate level, it's not 'free' speech, it's free speech with limitations and censorship. And the biggest party for censorship, are the Democrats.

the 1st A isnt about free speech,, its about government restricting or forcing speech,, along with the other things listed in it,,