Stormy Daniels Has A Monica Lewinsky type dress’ to test for Trump’s DNA, report says

[hunarcy]

Please present your evidence to prove it was an "
Please present your evidence that the payment was some kind of in kind political contribution in violation of the campaign finance laws.

The story has just broke dude...............they are still looking into the payment to see if it violated campaign finance laws.

So, she's premature. Gotcha

Wow....................do you even pay attention to what the story is actually doing, or do you just make shit up? Ms. Daniels is the one that said she had an affair with Trump and was paid 130,000 to sign an NDA.

Because of the way the payment was made, they are looking to see if the payment was made with campaign contributions or not. If it was, it's against campaign finance laws.

Ms. Daniels only told about the affair, she's not the one investigating the campaign or if contributions were made from Trump's campaign, it's election investigators doing that.

No, Ms. Daniels isn't being "premature".

LOL! Your reading comprehension is weak. Jillian was being premature. And, since the attorney said he paid the woman out of his personal funds, unless you can show it would have been a contribution to Trump until it was diverted to the woman, the idea it is a campaign contribution is ridiculous.

I don't think that the lawyer paid the money out of his own personal funds out of the goodness of his heart. Why? Because in his statement, he was complaining that Trump has yet to reimburse him. Nope, sorry, there is a cover up going on here.

LMAO! If I were married to Melania, I'd sure cover up an affair with Stormy Daniels.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

poor Donald.

Really?

 

[Cellblock2429]

no, he had her paid off with funds that seem to have constituted an iif you have a TABC permit, you can't allow people to bring their firearms on to the premises.

Please present your evidence to prove it was an "

no, he had her paid off with funds that seem to have constituted an in kind political contribution in violation of the campaign finance laws.

Please present your evidence that the payment was some kind of in kind political contribution in violation of the campaign finance laws.

The story has just broke dude...............they are still looking into the payment to see if it violated campaign finance laws.

So, she's premature. Gotcha

Wow....................do you even pay attention to what the story is actually doing, or do you just make shit up? Ms. Daniels is the one that said she had an affair with Trump and was paid 130,000 to sign an NDA.

Because of the way the payment was made, they are looking to see if the payment was made with campaign contributions or not. If it was, it's against campaign finance laws.

Ms. Daniels only told about the affair, she's not the one investigating the campaign or if contributions were made from Trump's campaign, it's election investigators doing that.

No, Ms. Daniels isn't being "premature".

LOL! Your reading comprehension is weak. Jillian was being premature. And, since the attorney said he paid the woman out of his personal funds, unless you can show it would have been a contribution to Trump until it was diverted to the woman, the idea it is a campaign contribution is ridiculous.

/----/ " the idea it is a campaign contribution is ridiculous." Running on the ridiculous is standard operating procedure at the DNC.