No now see junior thats where you are wrong again.. I speak about the hypocrisy going on and the completely ignorant way we are told conflicting things by many of the same people.. Lowering total exposure would be to start with the medical applications, seeing as how that would require the least amount of new laws, and the most benefit at the least cost.. They INJECT that mercury into people, I hardly consider a trace amount from an exhaust gas to be on the same level...
Mercury in vaccines has dropped percipituously in recent years due to the autism scare, so that example doesn't really seem to apply, and CFLs are contained and innocuous when handled and disposed of properly. The main source of mercury is undoubtedly found in the air and water as a result of industrial waste. We eat and breath DAILY. How often do you get vaccines and what % actually have mercury?
Do you have any proof of any of that junior? tell you what you show me the proof then I may decide differently, but just your word won't cut it.. And EPA statistics that cannot show anything but possibilities, are not proof of anything other than possibilities..
Proof of what? Are you denying that mercury in vaccines has been in the news and that steps are being taken to minimize its use? Are you denying that properly treated CFLs have a very low risk for mercury contamination? If you don't, and I don't see how you could, where else is this mercury coming from? Is it like the extra CO2 in the atmosphere, you don't know where it's coming from, but you definitely know its not coming from man? What IS that, selective prescience?!?!