Stocks do 9 times better when Democrats are in the White House

Social Security is solvent for the next 25 years.

But the Republicans are putting up this smoke screen so their masters on Wall Street can get their hands on all that delicious retirement money.

.are you going to now tell me that the Democrats when in power have never touched SS or anyone else's retirement accounts?....
 
Social Security is solvent for the next 25 years.

But the Republicans are putting up this smoke screen so their masters on Wall Street can get their hands on all that delicious retirement money.

.are you going to now tell me that the Democrats when in power have never touched SS or anyone else's retirement accounts?....

Watch Chrissy squirm and/or come up with a false graph or link in 3...2...1...
 
Social Security is solvent for the next 25 years.

But the Republicans are putting up this smoke screen so their masters on Wall Street can get their hands on all that delicious retirement money.

Sure it is Chris, sure it is

Chris is Wall Street Good or Bad?
 
Social Security is solvent for the next 25 years.

But the Republicans are putting up this smoke screen so their masters on Wall Street can get their hands on all that delicious retirement money.

Sure it is Chris, sure it is

Chris is Wall Street Good or Bad?

Only good when it rises under a President like Obama....otherwise? They need to be drawn an quartered...shut down.

Chrissy is a duplicitous partisan hack
 
It's fun to watch you guys flounder around.

Republicans allow Wall Street to run Ponzi schemes that destroy the world economy.

That's why Democrats are better for business, because capitalism without regulation is the Mafia.
 
Last edited:
While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street,

you're an imbecile...I couldn't get past that....I am sure the rest is rubbish.
 
While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street,

you're an imbecile...I couldn't get past that....I am sure the rest is rubbish.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

You didn't even read the article.

That's a quote from Bloomberg, not me.
 
While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street,

you're an imbecile...I couldn't get past that....I am sure the rest is rubbish.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

You didn't even read the article.

That's a quote from Bloomberg, not me.
how come you pass over Questions asked of you Chris?.....are you like Dean,say stuff you cant back up....so just ignore it or run from the thread.....makes you look real credible....
 
you're an imbecile...I couldn't get past that....I am sure the rest is rubbish.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

You didn't even read the article.

That's a quote from Bloomberg, not me.
how come you pass over Questions asked of you Chris?.....are you like Dean,say stuff you cant back up....so just ignore it or run from the thread.....makes you look real credible....

Because I have a full time job.

What questions?
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol:

You didn't even read the article.

That's a quote from Bloomberg, not me.
how come you pass over Questions asked of you Chris?.....are you like Dean,say stuff you cant back up....so just ignore it or run from the thread.....makes you look real credible....

Because I have a full time job.

What questions?
do you follow your own threads?.....i have asked 2.....and a few others have asked some....
 
Because I have a full time job.

What questions?
do you follow your own threads?.....i have asked 2.....and a few others have asked some....

Sorry, I don't have time.

What questions?

so in other words....your just like Dean....throw some bullshit up....someone says wait a minute how come......and just like the little twerps you two are......see ya.....now can you understand Chris why you get treated with the respect you get here?.....why so many call you a Dick instead of responding to what you post?.....well i gave it a shot,ill go back to treating you the way i always have.....you and your pal Dean are two dishonest PetaQ's and will be treated as such....
 
Yeah, we know. Last time, Terry McAuliffe, golfing buddy and close 'goombah' of "Slick Willy" Clinton and also head of the DNC at the same time, somehow received a tip and put some $100,000 into a company called Global Crossing, ran by a fellow named Garry Winnick, also a golfing buddy of said, same 'Slick Willy" Clinton. They then were issued stock and promptly sold their holdings. The company filed for bankruptcy shortly afterwards, inevitably leaving the widows and orphans holding the bag.
Mr McAuliffe escaped the debacle with some five or ten million dollars in pocket if memory serves, and Mr Winnick's winnings were in the hundreds of millions. The SEC politely suggested that Mr Winnick deposit some 65 million in a fund for the widows and orphans, but Mr Winnick declined.
 
Post 1929, the Dow never recovered to its pre crash levels until 1953, the year of a Republican President.
In between, the nation experienced some twenty years of Democratic Presidents, eight years under HST, and twelve under FDR. In those years the nation, under FDR, saw many and varied attempts at establishing agricultural communes and collectives and the complete trashing of multiple industries as Roosevelt attempted to impose different versions of Socialism on the American economy. Only when Roosevelt relented on his Socialist aspirations and intentions in order to blunt the Nazi threat did the American economy start to heal and the people go back to work en mas.
Prior to Roosevelt, the Federal Governments effect on the nation's economy was negligible and insignificant. At the end of FDR's terms, the Federal Governments affect on the National economy was significant and meaningful. The tremendous growth the Federal Government experienced under FDR came at the expense of the American people, out of their mouths and wallets, off their backs and their feet.
 
GDP has been growing since 2009.
The stock market has doubled since 2009.
Americans net worth is up $9 trillion dollars since 2009.
3.7 million private sector jobs have been created since 2009.
Auto sales are up.
Retail sales are up.
Home sales are up.
Unemployment is down.
GM was saved, and is now the number one automaker in the world.
Obama has done a good job.
 

Forum List

Back
Top